The Samba-Bugzilla – Bug 9549
async smb echo handler has a memleak
Last modified: 2013-01-11 16:39:01 UTC
Created attachment 8389 [details]
Jeremy, if you agree, please push to master.
Comment on attachment 8389 [details]
Looks good to me. Great catch !
Kaolin, can you
git cherry-pick 3d5c534f0cc7c6e3eead7462eef4a178c7035857
for 4.0.x ?
Pushed to autobuild-v4-0-test.
Pushed to v4-0-test.
Closing out bug report.
Can this one be put into 3.6 as well please?
... try to apply that to 3.6 :-)
It was more a question to Karolin if this could be included in 3.6.next :)
Ok, sorry for the irony mode: What I wanted to say is that the async echo responder in 3.6 looks completely different. The memleak does not exist there.