Created attachment 6494 [details]
fixes use of AS_TR_SH in AC_VERIFY_C_PROTOTYPE
Must use eval with AS_TR_SH in assignment.
The attached patch fixes the problem.
The problem manifests itself as such:
./configure: line 9931: ac_cv_c_prototype_struct_passwd_pgetpwent_r_struct_passwd_psrc__char_pbuf__int_buflen_=no: command not found
./configure: line 9978: ac_cv_c_prototype_struct_passwd_pgetpwent_r_struct_passwd_psrc__char_pbuf__size_t_buflen_=no: command not found
./configure: line 10073: ac_cv_c_prototype_struct_group_pgetgrent_r_struct_group_psrc__char_pbuf__int_buflen_=no: command not found
./configure: line 10121: ac_cv_c_prototype_struct_group_pgetgrent_r_struct_group_psrc__char_pbuf__size_t_buflen_=no: command not found
./configure: line 10408: ac_cv_c_prototype_void_pdlopen_const_charp_filename__unsigned_int_flags_=no: command not found
This is still not resolved till today (Samba 3.5.21).
to v3-5 and
Michael, one of the patches was from you, can you have a look at this?
(In reply to comment #1)
> This is still not resolved till today (Samba 3.5.21).
> Please backport
> d02b5cd65574a3f0af3fa73439af251e728c87d8 and
> to v3-5 and
> to v3-6.
> Thank you.
3.5 is in the security fixes only mode, so there won't be any 3.5 bugfix releases. Of course it is possible that someone will provide backported patches in this bug report anyway.
Am 30.04.2013 09:01, schrieb email@example.com:
> 3.5 is in the security fixes only mode, so there won't be any 3.5 bugfix
> releases. Of course it is possible that someone will provide backported patches
> in this bug report anyway.
But what about 0ef506d4f31d206c300e4f3f326edac2b60bdc15 for 3.6? Should
I open a new bug for 3.6?
Marking as fixed per the listed commits, sadly we can't keep bugs open to request backports to unsupported releases.