Bug 700 - spurious authentications when enumerating servers
spurious authentications when enumerating servers
Product: Samba 3.0
Classification: Unclassified
Component: libsmbclient
Other other
: P3 normal
: none
Assigned To: Samba Bugzilla Account
Depends on:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2003-10-30 08:39 UTC by Bastien Nocera
Modified: 2005-08-24 10:20 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:

test program (979 bytes, text/plain)
2003-12-16 11:13 UTC, Bastien Nocera
no flags Details
output of a test run on a small 1 machine network with samba running (26.42 KB, text/plain)
2003-12-16 11:16 UTC, Bastien Nocera
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Bastien Nocera 2003-10-30 08:39:33 UTC
when reading smb:// unneeded authentication calls are being made.
This makes enumerating servers on the local network ask the user for a password.
Comment 1 Mantas Kriauèiûnas 2003-10-31 05:01:59 UTC
Maybe there are any workarounds when using libsmbclient 3.0.0 ?
Comment 2 Jeremy Allison 2003-11-07 14:06:16 UTC
Ok, can you give me more details on these "spurious" authentications.
Network traces and an explaination of how to reproduce would help.
Comment 3 Joe Drew 2003-11-07 14:43:57 UTC
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119172 for the background. I'm not
sure if this answers your question, though.
Comment 4 Bastien Nocera 2003-12-16 11:13:51 UTC
Created attachment 327 [details]
test program

Test program that shows the spurious authentications.
Comment 5 Bastien Nocera 2003-12-16 11:16:59 UTC
Created attachment 328 [details]
output of a test run on a small 1 machine network with samba running

You can see in the logs here that there was one authentication request when
browsing smb://. This is unneeded, IMO, and on decently sized networks, it's
going to create a lot of authentication requests.
Comment 6 Gerald (Jerry) Carter 2005-02-17 15:43:20 UTC
closing this one.  No followup reports confirming any bug and the 
report is so old it may or may not be valid.  If the bug still exists
in 3.0.11, please reopen.  Thanks.
Comment 7 Gerald (Jerry) Carter 2005-08-24 10:20:59 UTC
sorry for the same, cleaning up the database to prevent unecessary reopens of bugs.