Bug 619 - smbcacls(1) ignores -n option
Summary: smbcacls(1) ignores -n option
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Samba 3.0
Classification: Unclassified
Component: User/Group Accounts (show other bugs)
Version: 3.0.0
Hardware: All All
: P3 normal
Target Milestone: none
Assignee: Jelmer Vernooij
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-10-14 05:38 UTC by SATOH Fumiyasu
Modified: 2005-08-24 10:15 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Proposed patch. (1.58 KB, patch)
2004-07-01 07:22 UTC, SATOH Fumiyasu 		no flags Details
Proposed patch (corrected). (771 bytes, patch)
2004-07-01 07:24 UTC, SATOH Fumiyasu 		no flags Details
Show Obsolete (1) View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description SATOH Fumiyasu 2003-10-14 05:38:25 UTC 
The smbcacls(1) man page says smbcacls command has '-n' option to displays all
ACL information in numeric format, but smbcacls command ignores it.

$ smbcacls //server/share . -U admin%pass -n
REVISION:1
OWNER:SERVER\fumiya
GROUP:SERVER\fumiya
Comment 1 SATOH Fumiyasu 2004-07-01 07:22:34 UTC 
Created attachment 552 [details]
Proposed patch.
Comment 2 SATOH Fumiyasu 2004-07-01 07:24:22 UTC 
Created attachment 553 [details]
Proposed patch (corrected).
Comment 3 Björn Jacke 2004-07-01 10:32:36 UTC 
or just use --numeric instead of -n. I think we do not need -n when --numeric
works just as wanted. Man page should be fixed. smbcacls --help tells the
correct options.
Comment 4 Jelmer Vernooij 2004-07-01 11:30:58 UTC 
I've fixed this in the docs (as proposed by Björn Jacke) 
-n is a common option for specifying our NetBIOS name, so to prevent 
confusion, I prefer not to give it two meanings.
Comment 5 Gerald (Jerry) Carter (dead mail address) 2005-08-24 10:15:59 UTC 
sorry for the same, cleaning up the database to prevent unecessary reopens of bugs.