Bug 5616 - no connection to a share
Summary: no connection to a share
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Samba 3.2
Classification: Unclassified
Component: File services (show other bugs)
Version: 3.2.0
Hardware: Sparc Windows 2000
: P3 major
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Samba Bugzilla Account
QA Contact: Samba QA Contact
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-07-16 00:53 UTC by Ralf Weinert (dead mail address)
Modified: 2008-07-31 00:54 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments
no connection to a shre (263.30 KB, application/x-gzip)
2008-07-16 00:56 UTC, Ralf Weinert (dead mail address)
no flags Details
no share connection (61.42 KB, application/x-gzip)
2008-07-24 01:14 UTC, Ralf Weinert (dead mail address)
no flags Details
proposed patch (1.65 KB, patch)
2008-07-28 11:07 UTC, Volker Lendecke
no flags Details
no share connection (924.15 KB, application/x-gzip)
2008-07-29 08:55 UTC, Ralf Weinert (dead mail address)
no flags Details
no share connection (924.15 KB, application/x-gzip)
2008-07-29 09:00 UTC, Ralf Weinert (dead mail address)
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ralf Weinert (dead mail address) 2008-07-16 00:53:12 UTC
when a client (Windows 200) tries to get a connection to a share over the samba server (3.2.0) I only see in the Windows explorer the icon for the wanted share. but as soon as I try to get the subdirectories of that share the explorer tells me that this connection does not work. In the samba logfile I can read the message:

Libsmb/smb_signing.c:srv_check_incoming_message(754)
srv_check_incoming_message: BAD SIG: seq 2 got SMB signature of

the last Samba version I used was 3.0.30 this one works without any problems

I have a zip-file containing the logged messages (level 10) and the config file, bit I don't know where to sent.

the samba server is a E450 running Solaris8
Comment 1 Ralf Weinert (dead mail address) 2008-07-16 00:56:31 UTC
Created attachment 3413 [details]
no connection to a shre

Okay forget my last input, I found a way to sent my file
Comment 2 Karolin Seeger 2008-07-22 14:59:04 UTC
Please remove the settings for IPC$ from your smb.conf and try again.

The problem is that the client 129.103.112.105 ist not allowed to connect to IPC$:

[2008/07/15 13:42:26,  4] smbd/reply.c:reply_tcon_and_X(653)
  Client requested device type [?????] for share [IPC$]
[2008/07/15 13:42:26,  5] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1376)
  making a connection to 'normal' service ipc$
[2008/07/15 13:42:26,  3] lib/access.c:check_access(389)
  check_access: no hostnames in host allow/deny list.
[2008/07/15 13:42:26,  0] lib/access.c:check_access(410)
  Denied connection from  (129.103.112.105)
[2008/07/15 13:42:26,  3] smbd/error.c:error_packet_set(61)
  error packet at smbd/reply.c(662) cmd=117 (SMBtconX) NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED

Marking bug report as invalid.
Please re-open if it still doesn't work without the IPC$ settings.
Comment 3 Ralf Weinert (dead mail address) 2008-07-24 01:12:22 UTC
Hi,
although I removed the settings for IPC$, the share does not work properly.
After the connection succeeded, the next try to dive into the connected directory I get the message the connection is no longer available. I put a logfile to my report.
Comment 4 Ralf Weinert (dead mail address) 2008-07-24 01:14:44 UTC
Created attachment 3420 [details]
no share connection
Comment 5 Volker Lendecke 2008-07-28 11:07:05 UTC
Created attachment 3426 [details]
proposed patch

The attached patch fixes the bug for me, can you try that?

Volker
Comment 6 Volker Lendecke 2008-07-28 11:09:05 UTC
Without the attached patch I could reproduce the bug, with the patch it works for me. So I'm closing it, but feel free to re-open if the patch does not help.

Thanks for the bug report and the log files,

Volker
Comment 7 Ralf Weinert (dead mail address) 2008-07-29 08:55:48 UTC
Created attachment 3436 [details]
no share connection
Comment 8 Ralf Weinert (dead mail address) 2008-07-29 09:00:04 UTC
Created attachment 3437 [details]
no share connection
Comment 9 Volker Lendecke 2008-07-29 09:57:20 UTC
Ok, the signing bug is gone. Does it work now?

Volker
Comment 10 Volker Lendecke 2008-07-29 10:00:46 UTC
Ah, okay, just found the panic. Can you try the patch from bug 5512?

Thanks,

Volker
Comment 11 Ralf Weinert (dead mail address) 2008-07-31 00:54:23 UTC
Hi, the patched version 3.2.0 is running fine.

The bug can be closed.

Thanks