Bug 548 - usleep() vs. sys_usleep()
Summary: usleep() vs. sys_usleep()
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Samba 3.0
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Build environment (show other bugs)
Version: 3.0.0
Hardware: Other other
: P3 normal
Target Milestone: 3.0.1
Assignee: Tim Potter
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-10-01 03:41 UTC by Joachim Schmitz (mail address dead)
Modified: 2005-08-24 10:18 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Joachim Schmitz (mail address dead) 2003-10-01 03:41:00 UTC 
Hi there

here usleep() is used instead of sys_usleep():
--- source/rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c.orig  2003-08-28 23:42:45.000000000 +0200
+++ source/rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c       2003-09-30 12:26:09.000000000 +0200
@@ -1803,7 +1803,7 @@
                && (RA_WIN2K == get_remote_arch()) )
        {
                DEBUG(10,("_spoolss_open_printer_ex: Enabling LAN/WAN hack for W
in2k clients.\n"));
-               usleep( 500000 );
+               sys_usleep( 500000 );
        }

        return WERR_OK;


Bye, Jojo
Comment 1 Jeremy Allison 2003-10-02 10:36:58 UTC 
Applied, thanks.
Jeremy.
Comment 2 Gerald (Jerry) Carter (dead mail address) 2005-08-24 10:18:19 UTC 
sorry for the same, cleaning up the database to prevent unecessary reopens of bugs.