pro-forma bug for Samba3.0 see bug#5446 for 3.2 and general discussion I will attach a 3.0 specific proposed patch here. Side note: as far as I understand samba VFS, the VFS OPs for this workaround should be set to SMB_VFS_LAYER_OPAQUE, but this leads to SIGSEGVs, which is why I used SMB_VFS_LAYER_TRANSPARENT for this patch. Any improvements welcome.
Created attachment 3279 [details] Proposed workaround (fix?)
see bug#5446 for some notes on why I belive the patch is a valid solution
Created attachment 3345 [details] Cleaned up patch for vfs_zfsacl.c Have cleaned up function signatures and successfully repeated validation tests
Marking this bug as duplicate of 5446 since the zfsacl module is not available in samba 3.0 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 5446 ***