pro-forma bug for Samba3.0
see bug#5446 for 3.2 and general discussion
I will attach a 3.0 specific proposed patch here.
Side note: as far as I understand samba VFS, the VFS OPs
for this workaround should be set to SMB_VFS_LAYER_OPAQUE,
but this leads to SIGSEGVs, which is why I used
SMB_VFS_LAYER_TRANSPARENT for this patch.
Any improvements welcome.
Created attachment 3279 [details]
Proposed workaround (fix?)
see bug#5446 for some notes on why I belive the patch is a valid solution
Created attachment 3345 [details]
Cleaned up patch for vfs_zfsacl.c
Have cleaned up function signatures and successfully repeated validation tests
Marking this bug as duplicate of 5446 since the zfsacl module is not available in samba 3.0
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 5446 ***