This is a issue for all commands so maybe Extended Characters is not good.
As described at
Maybe we need to disscuss the messege catalog system for commands again.
> >I think $prefix/swat/lang is a better place for the msg files than
> For SWAT, I think it's OK and go ahead.
> But remember that d_printf() is used by commands, though I think
> commands should use local message catalogue system:
Doh. I forgot about this bit. I think the swat i18n files could
be kept separately for the moment maybe.
I recommend that
| 1. Samba internal message catalogue system for SWAT
| Indeed GNU gettext() is used in Samba Japanese Edition, but is
| not the essential matter. We can use another product regardless
| of what message catalugue system is used in a platform.
| 2. a message catalogue system used on the platform for commands
| Unlike SWAT, the language of Samba command output should be
| essentially same as that of platform command output.
| For example we should be able to change the output language of
| "ls" command, "smbclient" and other commands of manually
| installed products at a time.
Currently message catalogue system for SWAT is implemented with
d_printf(). d_printf() is also used in commands, but there are no
message catalogue for them and no call for init_lang_tdb() so the
d_printf()s are indeed equal to printf().
Also the lang_tdb code creates a file in the Samba locks directory which
is not necessarily going to be writable by whoever runs the client
I can't see this getting addressed in Samba 3 with half the developers off on