Bug 4776 - pb with group name that use the enderscore caractere
Summary: pb with group name that use the enderscore caractere
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 4775
Alias: None
Product: Samba 3.0
Classification: Unclassified
Component: winbind (show other bugs)
Version: 3.0.25a
Hardware: PPC AIX
: P3 normal
Target Milestone: none
Assignee: Samba Bugzilla Account
QA Contact: Samba QA Contact
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-07-11 09:22 UTC by mickael gellé
Modified: 2007-07-11 09:33 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description mickael gellé 2007-07-11 09:22:41 UTC
I configure samba on aix 5.3 to use the cif service file from windows client in a active directory architecture.
I install all the opt-samba-base composants (pware.base.5.2.0.0.bff, pware.BerkeleyDB.4.4-NC.4.4.20.4.bff, pware.cyrus-sasl.2.1.22.0.bff, pware.gcc-shared-libs.4.1.1.0.bff, pware.libiconv.1.9.2.0.bff, pware.openssl.0.9.8.3.bff, pware.openldap.2.3.27.0.bff) from samba site.
I compile samba with ad support, configure the smb.conf file with "security = ads" amongst other things.
All fine, i can use share on the aix server and restric the security to groups defined from the active directory windows domain controler.
But when a name group (local or global group) used enderscore caracteren, i can't access to the share.

I defined two same group except the name that use enderscore caractere (ex : test_gr) for one and on no enderscore caractere for the other one (ex : testgr).  I have this section on the smb.conf :
[test_gr]
comment = test
path = /tmp/samba/test_gr
valid users = @"RESSOURCES+test_gr"

[testgr]
comment = test
path = /tmp/samba/testgr
valid group = @"RESSOURCES+testgr"

(RESSOURCES is the domain name, the windbind separator is defined whith option "winbind separator = +").

It's ok for access to the share testgr but not for the test_gr.

Perhaps a bug ?

Thanks,

Mickaël gellé
Comment 1 Gerald (Jerry) Carter (dead mail address) 2007-07-11 09:33:36 UTC
duplicate right ?

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 4775 ***