Bug 4432 - update
Summary: update
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Samba 3.0
Classification: Unclassified
Component: File Services (show other bugs)
Version: 3.0.25
Hardware: x86 Windows XP
: P3 normal
Target Milestone: none
Assignee: Samba Bugzilla Account
QA Contact: Samba QA Contact
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-03-05 19:13 UTC by gqin
Modified: 2007-03-23 02:22 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description gqin 2007-03-05 19:13:41 UTC
When I creat a new file, stick a file or delete a file, windows client-side interface couldn't update automatically.
Therefore,the file list might not be the newest shown in the current file package. I am wondering how to solve it.
Comment 1 Volker Lendecke 2007-03-06 01:27:20 UTC
You are sure you are running 3.0.25? If yes, can you please upload your smb.conf, a debug level 10 log and a network trace of your actions?

Thanks,

Volker
Comment 2 gqin 2007-03-06 18:45:24 UTC
I'm sorry 
I running is 3.0.24 



Comment 3 Volker Lendecke 2007-03-07 04:41:24 UTC
Ok. I was asking because with 3.0.25 this part has been completely rewritten. It was made Windows compatible to the extent that we know about the Windows behaviour.

Please re-test with 3.0.25pre1. Please be aware that this is a release NOT intended for production.

I'm marking this bug as fixed. If you still have problems when 3.0.25 is out, please re-open.

Volker
Comment 4 gqin 2007-03-07 19:05:42 UTC
this bug still running 
but no log for it 
Comment 5 gqin 2007-03-07 19:08:57 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
today ,I'm running samba-3.0.25pre1
> this bug still running 
> but no log for it 

Comment 6 Volker Lendecke 2007-03-08 00:41:11 UTC
So, please send your smb.conf, a debug level 10 log of smbd and a network sniff of the action that fails. See http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Capture_Packets for how to do sniffs. If possible, please also upload a network sniffs of the same actions against Windows as a server so that we can see what we get wrong.

Volker
Comment 7 gqin 2007-03-08 21:26:44 UTC
this is log:
[2007/03/08 11:21:41, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(697)
  Netbios nameserver version 3.0.25pre1 started.
  Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2007
[2007/03/08 11:21:42, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(716)
  standard input is not a socket, assuming -D option
[2007/03/08 13:31:22, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:terminate(58)
  Got SIGTERM: going down...
[2007/03/08 13:31:22, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(697)
  Netbios nameserver version 3.0.25pre1 started.
  Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2007
[2007/03/08 13:31:23, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(716)
  standard input is not a socket, assuming -D option
[2007/03/08 14:11:27, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:validate_nmb_packet(1364)
  validate_nmb_packet: Bad REG/REFRESH Packet. validate_nmb_packet: Ignoring request packet with opcode 5.
[2007/03/08 14:11:27, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:validate_nmb_packet(1364)
  validate_nmb_packet: Bad REG/REFRESH Packet. validate_nmb_packet: Ignoring request packet with opcode 5.
[2007/03/08 14:11:27, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:validate_nmb_packet(1364)
  validate_nmb_packet: Bad REG/REFRESH Packet. validate_nmb_packet: Ignoring request packet with opcode 5.
[2007/03/08 14:11:27, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:validate_nmb_packet(1364)
  validate_nmb_packet: Bad REG/REFRESH Packet. validate_nmb_packet: Ignoring request packet with opcode 5.
[2007/03/08 15:25:55, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:validate_nmb_packet(1364)
  validate_nmb_packet: Bad REG/REFRESH Packet. validate_nmb_packet: Ignoring request packet with opcode 5.
[2007/03/08 15:25:55, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:validate_nmb_packet(1364)
  validate_nmb_packet: Bad REG/REFRESH Packet. validate_nmb_packet: Ignoring request packet with opcode 5.
[2007/03/08 15:25:55, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:validate_nmb_packet(1364)
  validate_nmb_packet: Bad REG/REFRESH Packet. validate_nmb_packet: Ignoring request packet with opcode 5.
[2007/03/08 15:25:55, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:validate_nmb_packet(1364)
  validate_nmb_packet: Bad REG/REFRESH Packet. validate_nmb_packet: Ignoring request packet with opcode 5.
[2007/03/09 08:16:52, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:validate_nmb_packet(1364)
  validate_nmb_packet: Bad REG/REFRESH Packet. validate_nmb_packet: Ignoring request packet with opcode 5.
[2007/03/09 08:16:52, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:validate_nmb_packet(1364)
  validate_nmb_packet: Bad REG/REFRESH Packet. validate_nmb_packet: Ignoring request packet with opcode 5.
[2007/03/09 08:16:52, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:validate_nmb_packet(1364)
  validate_nmb_packet: Bad REG/REFRESH Packet. validate_nmb_packet: Ignoring request packet with opcode 5.
[2007/03/09 08:16:52, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:validate_nmb_packet(1364)
  validate_nmb_packet: Bad REG/REFRESH Packet. validate_nmb_packet: Ignoring request packet with opcode 5.


this is smb.conf

root@samba ~]# testparm
Load smb config files from /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf
Processing section "[homes]"
Processing section "[data]"
Processing section "[printers]"
Loaded services file OK.
Server role: ROLE_STANDALONE
Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions

[global]
        dos charset = cp936
        unix charset = cp936
        display charset = cp936
        workgroup = MYGROUP
        server string = Samba Server
        log file = /usr/local/samba/var/%m.log
        max log size = 50
        smb ports = 139
        disable spoolss = Yes
        dns proxy = No

[homes]
        comment = Home Directories
        read only = No
        browseable = No

[data]
        comment = data
        path = /data
        read only = No

[printers]
        comment = All Printers
        path = /usr/spool/samba
        printable = Yes
        browseable = No




Comment 8 gqin 2007-03-22 19:49:31 UTC
why no fix it 
Comment 9 Volker Lendecke 2007-03-23 02:22:49 UTC
Simple: Your log file is from nmbd and not a debug level 10 from smbd and no network sniff. Bugs without decent log files are just not fixable and fall back on priority.

Volker