Bug 3627 - Build on later AIX platforms fails to link for dynamic loads
Summary: Build on later AIX platforms fails to link for dynamic loads
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 1649
Alias: None
Product: Samba 3.0
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Build environment (show other bugs)
Version: 3.0.21c
Hardware: Other AIX
: P3 normal
Target Milestone: none
Assignee: William Jojo
QA Contact: Samba QA Contact
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-03-23 07:52 UTC by Howard Wilkinson
Modified: 2006-04-10 06:27 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments
Patch configure for AIX late release (184 bytes, patch)
2006-03-23 07:52 UTC, Howard Wilkinson 		no flags Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Howard Wilkinson 2006-03-23 07:52:13 UTC 
There have been a number of problems running Samba on AIX 5.3 reported by a number of people in various sites around the web.

At least one of the problems arises from a change in the linker options from a previous AIX release.

The current SVN for the configure script has a fix for this but it is not in the 3.0.21c release.

I enclose a patch that if applied to 3.0.21c with patch -p1 will set up the system to build correctly on such an AIX. This is obviously OS release dependent and I have not made any effort to fix for the different releases as I do not know when the change happened or how to determine which OS is running.
Comment 1 Howard Wilkinson 2006-03-23 07:52:56 UTC 
Created attachment 1822 [details]
Patch configure for AIX late release
Comment 2 Gerald (Jerry) Carter (dead mail address) 2006-04-08 11:34:12 UTC 
Bill,  would you evaluate this patch when you get a chance?  Thanks.
Comment 3 William Jojo 2006-04-10 06:27:38 UTC 
(In reply to comment #2)
> Bill,  would you evaluate this patch when you get a chance?  Thanks.

I believe the patch I submitted for #1649 is committed to TRUNK. This is essentially the same and this should be closed. :-)

Bill


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 1649 ***