Bug 3228 - "users" and "administrators" treated as reserved groups
"users" and "administrators" treated as reserved groups
Product: Samba 3.0
Classification: Unclassified
Component: User/Group Accounts
All Windows XP
: P3 normal
: none
Assigned To: Samba Bugzilla Account
Samba QA Contact
Depends on:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2005-10-31 12:26 UTC by Eric A. Hall
Modified: 2006-01-17 22:08 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Eric A. Hall 2005-10-31 12:26:59 UTC
I had numerous problems managing user accounts with usrmgr.exe and the net rpc
group utilities (problems included being unable to modify the user due to group
errors, inability to edit some groups, and so forth). I tracked this down to a
group name of "Users", which appears to be reserved within Samba. Further
investigation showed that the "Administrators" group was also problematic.

I ass-u-me that there is some expectation that the Users and Administrators
groups are going to be local/built-in groups (they exist in all NT domains).
However, this is not a particularly valid assumption for Samba, since *NIX does
not really have an applicable concept of "local" groups (nesting isn't
applicable and doesn't mean anything, for example).

I have posted a series of screenies at http://www.ehsco.com/misc/samba/ and some
discussion on this problem can also be seen in the list archives at
Comment 1 Gerald (Jerry) Carter 2006-01-17 22:08:42 UTC
The correct fix will does in fact implement the BUILTIN groups
will be in a future release.  The assumption about Users 
and Administrators is valid, even in Samba.