Bug 2399 - VFS modules do not work without creating a local directory for the path
Summary: VFS modules do not work without creating a local directory for the path
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Samba 3.0
Classification: Unclassified
Component: File Services (show other bugs)
Version: 3.0.14a
Hardware: All All
: P3 major
Target Milestone: none
Assignee: Gerald (Jerry) Carter (dead mail address)
QA Contact: Samba QA Contact
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-02-28 21:55 UTC by Constantin Scheder
Modified: 2005-08-24 10:16 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Constantin Scheder 2005-02-28 21:55:23 UTC
In the function 'make_connection_snum' there is a call to vfs_ChDir within a 
CHECK_PATH_ON_TCONX block that is called before SMB_VFS_CONNECT. This might 
not have been noticed because it works as long as the local directory, 
which 'vfs_ChDir' refers to, exists. In the case of our global file systems 
(http://www.nirvanastorage.com) this is almost never the case so that this 
call always fails if we don't create a dummy local directory.
Comment 1 Gerald (Jerry) Carter (dead mail address) 2005-03-01 07:03:27 UTC
If you look closely, you'll see that CHECK_PATH_ON_TCONX
is never defined so all we do is a stat() to confirm that the
path is indeed a directory.  Same end result though.

This is by design.  We have to somehow check the validity 
of a share at connection time.  

I'm not familiar with gfs but can't you just trigger the 
gfs access via a preexec script ?

Of course, I'm always willing to look at patches.
Comment 2 Constantin Scheder 2005-03-01 13:47:40 UTC
There are two problems with the code:
1) IF and ONLY IF the CHECK_PATH_ON_TCONX IS DEFINED, a vfs_ChDir will be 
called BEFORE a SMB_VFS_CONNECT. This cannot work.
2) IF CHECK_PATH_ON_TCONX IS NOT DEFINED, a call to 'stat' is made to verify 
the validity of the share, which should be replaced by a call to SMB_VFS_STAT 
since the share path is not necessarily local.

The code below shows a suggested fix for the 2 problems:

/*********************************************************************/
/* this code block was moved up from the end of make_connection_snum */
/*********************************************************************/
/* Invoke VFS make connection hook */
if (SMB_VFS_CONNECT(conn, lp_servicename(snum), user) < 0) {
    DEBUG(0,("make_connection: VFS make connection failed!\n"));
    change_to_root_user();
    conn_free(conn);
    *status = NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL;
    return NULL;
}

#if CHECK_PATH_ON_TCONX
    /* win2000 does not check the permissions on the directory
       during the tree connect, instead relying on permission
       check during individual operations. To match this behaviour
       I have disabled this chdir check (tridge) */

    if (vfs_ChDir(conn,conn->connectpath) != 0) {
        DEBUG(0,("%s (%s) Can't change directory to %s (%s)\n",
             get_remote_machine_name(), conn->client_address,
             conn->connectpath,strerror(errno)));
        change_to_root_user();
        yield_connection(conn, lp_servicename(SNUM(conn)));
        conn_free(conn);
        *status = NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME;
        return NULL;
    }
#else
    /* the alternative is just to check the directory exists */
/*******************************************************************************
******************************/
/* this code was changed from 'stat(conn->connectpath, &st)' to 'SMB_VFS_STAT
(conn, conn->connectpath, &st)' */
/*******************************************************************************
******************************/
    if (SMB_VFS_STAT(conn, conn->connectpath, &st) != 0 || !S_ISDIR
(st.st_mode)) {
        DEBUG(0,("'%s' does not exist or is not a directory, when connecting to 
[%s]\n", conn->connectpath, lp_servicename(SNUM(conn))));
        change_to_root_user();
        yield_connection(conn, lp_servicename(SNUM(conn)));
        conn_free(conn);
        *status = NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME;
        return NULL;
    }
#endif
Comment 3 Jeremy Allison 2005-03-01 14:24:40 UTC
Fixed in SVN - thanks.
Jeremy.
Comment 4 Gerald (Jerry) Carter (dead mail address) 2005-03-01 14:43:41 UTC
Jeremy, you only applied the obviously correct portion 
of the patch (s/stat/SMB_VFS_STAT/g)

Comment 5 Gerald (Jerry) Carter (dead mail address) 2005-03-01 14:47:02 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> There are two problems with the code:
> 1) IF and ONLY IF the CHECK_PATH_ON_TCONX IS DEFINED, 
> a vfs_ChDir will be called BEFORE a SMB_VFS_CONNECT. This cannot work.

That code should be removed.  It will never be used again.

> 2) IF CHECK_PATH_ON_TCONX IS NOT DEFINED, a call to 'stat' 
> is made to verify the validity of the share, which should be 
> replaced by a call to SMB_VFS_STAT since the share path 
> is not necessarily local.

ok.  That makes sense.  What doesn't make sense is the move
of the SMB_VFS_CONNECT() before the SMB_VFS_STAT() call.
Do you have your opwn vfs module ?  I can't find any 
reference to one if your bug report.  That would help me understand
why the reordering would help.  The default nfswrap_dummy_connect() 
just returns 0.
Comment 6 Constantin Scheder 2005-03-01 22:45:50 UTC
The SMB_VFS_CONNECT() call needs to happen before any other calls to any VFS 
module. It doesn't make a difference for a local file system (where 
nfswrap_dummy_connect is used) but a real VFS module needs to initialize 
itself and potentially create a connection to a remote file system. Without 
this connection (established in SMB_VFS_CONNECT) any subsequent VFS calls will 
fail.
Comment 7 Constantin Scheder 2005-08-04 17:43:39 UTC
this bug is only partially fixed in 3.0.14a. The SMB_VFS_CONNECT block still 
needs to move BEFORE the SMB_VFS_STAT block. How can you perform a VFS 
operation on a VFS module without first establishing a connection to the VFS 
module?

Thanks for looking into this,
Constantin
Comment 8 Jeremy Allison 2005-08-04 18:16:11 UTC
Fixed in 3.0.20pre code.
Jeremy.
Comment 9 Gerald (Jerry) Carter (dead mail address) 2005-08-24 10:16:58 UTC
sorry for the same, cleaning up the database to prevent unecessary reopens of bugs.