Bug 1709 - Interoperability summary suggested into Samba HOWTO
Summary: Interoperability summary suggested into Samba HOWTO
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Samba 3.0
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Docs (show other bugs)
Version: 3.0.6
Hardware: All All
: P3 enhancement
Target Milestone: none
Assignee: John H Terpstra (mail address dead(
QA Contact: Samba Documentation QA Contact~
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-09-02 08:01 UTC by Clock
Modified: 2005-04-25 22:38 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Clock 2004-09-02 08:01:41 UTC 
I suggest Samba HOWTO to contain an interoperability summary where
interoperability between various Samba versions, features, Windows client and
server versions and Samba machines itself (for example the issue with Samba BDC
implying Samba PDC or something like that) would be clearly shown, best in some
kind of table.
Comment 1 John H Terpstra (mail address dead( 2004-11-23 09:28:03 UTC 
I would appreciate if you can help me with this report. An example would be most
useful. I will do my best to accommodate your request. -JHT
Comment 2 Gerald (Jerry) Carter (dead mail address) 2005-02-01 12:01:27 UTC 
updating qa contact
Comment 3 John H Terpstra (mail address dead( 2005-03-08 15:07:10 UTC 
(In reply to comment #0)
> I suggest Samba HOWTO to contain an interoperability summary where
> interoperability between various Samba versions, features, Windows client and
> server versions and Samba machines itself (for example the issue with Samba BDC
> implying Samba PDC or something like that) would be clearly shown, best in some
> kind of table.

Please can you provide some suggstions for this. I need to make a decision on
this  and would appreciate some more input. Thanks.
Comment 4 John H Terpstra (mail address dead( 2005-04-25 22:38:02 UTC 
I am closing this bug report. It does not provide enough information for me to 
work with. Sorry, I really did want to help improve the documentation. 
 
- John T.