Created attachment 12294 [details] Patch to add proto_tree_add_bitmask_with_flags() support From Wireshark commit: commit 9a5e6a6884b2369527638fecd49c4c58d8c10378 Author: Michael Mann <mmann78@netscape.net> Date: Wed Jun 15 15:35:51 2016 -0400 DCE/RPC proto_tree_add_boolean -> proto_tree_add_bitmask_with_flags Change-Id: I8891ec90244ffd9609d8443df631a7c8e6453b7e Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/15942 Petri-Dish: Michael Mann <mmann78@netscape.net> Tested-by: Petri Dish Buildbot <buildbot-no-reply@wireshark.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Mann <mmann78@netscape.net>
Created attachment 14905 [details] outstanding patches for pidl/lib/Parse/Pidl/Wireshark/ Some rough treatment of git gave me a list of 5 patches that Wireshark might want in Samba PIDL. Are these correct? [1/5] is shorn of context so its commit message needs help. BTW, we prefer patches generated by `git format-patch --stdout` rather than `git diff`, because it preserves the authorship and commit messages. This patchset would also deal with #12042. Are there other things I am missing?
Moving PIDL bugs into Samba as we do not release PIDL separately.
> commit 9a5e6a6884b2369527638fecd49c4c58d8c10378 > Author: Michael Mann <mmann78@netscape.net> > Date: Wed Jun 15 15:35:51 2016 -0400 > > DCE/RPC proto_tree_add_boolean -> proto_tree_add_bitmask_with_flags This went in as commit 3c97ad41c3ba440e7bb6bf7f5132aeb9032f08e9 Author: John Thacker <johnthacker@gmail.com> Date: Tue Jun 25 18:30:22 2024 -0400 pidl:Wireshark Use proto_tree_add_bitmask_with_flags via https://gitlab.com/samba-team/samba/-/merge_requests/3683 Other Wireshark patches arrived in https://gitlab.com/samba-team/samba/-/merge_requests/3699 which discusses whether there might be more that could be brought across. I'll close this bug.