--info=progress2 will not show increase of percentage done in real time as current throughput will. Percentage get's updated only after file has been transferred to destination. If you have 4 files you will get only 4 updates (jumps) of bandwidth %
Created attachment 9689 [details] suggested patch I actually posted about the same a while back on the list, but was't sure if it was expected behaviour (I would think not), or a bug. I made a patch which appears to fix this issue for most of my use cases and have been using this for a while now. From what I've seen this should fix bug 10451 as well.
(In reply to comment #0) >Percentage get's updated only after file has been transferred to destination. From what I noticed as well as looking the code, I think the percentage get's updated *before* the file even gets transferred , hence leading rsync to think that a huge file has been transferred instantaneously showing very huge unrealistic bandwidths. There after no more bytes transferred changes till the next file, causing speed to decay down again.
Thanks.. I will try it out. (In reply to comment #1) > Created attachment 9689 [details] > suggested patch > > I actually posted about the same a while back on the list, but was't sure if it > was expected behaviour (I would think not), or a bug. I made a patch which > appears to fix this issue for most of my use cases and have been using this for > a while now. From what I've seen this should fix bug 10451 as well.
Yes it works perfectly. Thanks a lot.. Also speed is correct as well (it settles to correct value) Have a nice day (In reply to comment #3) > Thanks.. I will try it out. > > (In reply to comment #1) > > Created attachment 9689 [details] [details] > > suggested patch > > > > I actually posted about the same a while back on the list, but was't sure if it > > was expected behaviour (I would think not), or a bug. I made a patch which > > appears to fix this issue for most of my use cases and have been using this for > > a while now. From what I've seen this should fix bug 10451 as well.
Thanks for the patch! I think this makes the output much nicer. I have applied it in the git repo for the next release.