Bug 2902 - Found domain (null)
Found domain (null)
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: Samba 3.0
Classification: Unclassified
Component: winbind
3.0.14a
All Linux
: P3 critical
: none
Assigned To: Samba Bugzilla Account
Samba QA Contact
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-07-20 02:08 UTC by Tom Fischer
Modified: 2005-08-29 14:26 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Tom Fischer 2005-07-20 02:08:25 UTC
Winbindd does not start a long time after add a new domain in a domain forest.
Following output with debug level 10:

...
Adding cache entry with key = SOME/DOMAIN; value =
S-1-5-21-xxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxx-xxxxxxx and timeout = Tue Jul 19 16:58:08 2005
 (297 seconds ahead)
Found domain (null)
===============================================================
INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 19792 (3.0.14a-SerNet-RedHat)
Please read the appendix Bugs of the Samba HOWTO collection
===============================================================
PANIC: internal error
BACKTRACE: 11 stack frames:
 #0 winbindd(smb_panic2+0x1b6) [0x80d6922]
 #1 winbindd(smb_panic+0x19) [0x80d6768]
 #2 winbindd [0x80c4339]
 #3 winbindd [0x80c43ae]
 #4 /lib/tls/libc.so.6 [0x38eeb8]
 #5 winbindd [0x808052b]
 #6 winbindd [0x808088c]
 #7 winbindd(init_domain_list+0x121) [0x8080b8d]
 #8 winbindd(main+0x580) [0x807b161]
 #9 /lib/tls/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xda) [0x37c78a]
 #10 winbindd(chroot+0x31) [0x807981d]
client_read: read 0 bytes. Need 1824 more for a full request.
read failed on sock 8, pid 19792: EOF

I suppose, that the domain exist but no SID is appropriate at the moment. The
domain is not completed replicate on all other domaincontrollers,inclusive my
"password server". When winbind try to get Information about the domain, they
will be not available.

I think winbindd should start at this point but don't inlcude the not completed
domains.
Comment 1 Jeremy Allison 2005-07-20 18:06:13 UTC
Winbindd has had significant work put into it between 3.0.14a and 3.0.20. Is it
possible you can test this with the 3.0.20 pre-release ?
Thanks,
Jeremy.
Comment 2 Gerald (Jerry) Carter 2005-08-29 14:26:21 UTC
closing .  no response.