Quick overview of problem: 1. Have 3 machines: Samba server, XP client, Linux client 2. Mount shares (smbmount on Linux, "map network drive" on XP) 3. Create a file called "test" on the server 4. Using the Linux cilent, do "mv test Test" (this fails). 5. Using the XP shell, do "move test Test" (this works). Extended info: Mounting a samba share using smbmount under linux leads to problems when dealing with filenames that differ in case only. These problems do not affect WinXP mounting the same share, so it looks like a client issue. The server is running Samba 3.0.2a on linux, kernel 2.4.25. This also happened with 3.0.1 and kernel 2.4.20. The relevant part of smb.conf looks like: case sensitive = yes preserve case = yes short preserve case = yes On the Samba server I create two files, "test" and "TEST", as follows: karmak@server$ echo test > test karmak@server$ echo TEST > TEST Running some commands from the linux client, after mounting with smbmount/3.0.1 (kernel 2.4.25): karmak@client$ ls TEST test karmak@client$ cat TEST test karmak@client$ cat test test karmak@client$ mv test Test mv: overwrite `Test'? n It appears 'cat' can only see the lowercase file. Same for when you try to move the file. Instead of renaming, it thinks you want to overwrite the existing file. Other file utilities are affected in similar ways. I believe the server is properly configured, since under WinXP the behavior is as one would expect: > dir ............. TEST ............. test > type TEST TEST > type test test > move test Test ... > dir ............. TEST ............. Test In short, XP has no problem distinguishing between the filenames that differ in case only, but Linux does. I find this odd, because I would expect the Linux client to be at least as capable as the WinXP client in handling the case differences (if anything I'd expect the XP machine to be the one with the problems).
smbfs is not part of samba. smbfs is known to be solidly broken. cifs is making good progress and will be the standard client soon. If you want to report that smbfs problem, you might do that in http://bugme.osdl.org.
cifs does this correct, and no samba bug anyway