Attachment 5443 Details for Bug 7191 – Slightly modified version.

[patch] Slightly modified version.

look (text/plain), 3.09 KB, created by Jeremy Allison on 2010-03-02 16:14:10 UTC

(hide)

Description:

Filename:

MIME Type:

Creator: Jeremy Allison

Created: 2010-03-02 16:14:10 UTC

Size: 3.09 KB

patch

obsolete

>diff --git a/source3/nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c b/source3/nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c
>index 0a5b1c8..74af30f 100644
>--- a/source3/nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c
>+++ b/source3/nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c
>@@ -1250,6 +1250,79 @@ to register name %s from IP %s.\n", nmb_namestr(question), inet_ntoa(p->ip) ));
> 			 */
> 
> 			if(!find_ip_in_name_record(namerec, from_ip)) {
>+				/*
>+				 * Need to emulate the behaviour of Windows, as
>+				 * described in:
>+				 * http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2001-October/016236.html
>+				 * (is there an MS reference for this
>+				 * somewhere?) because if the 1c list gets over
>+				 * 86 entries, the reply packet is too big
>+				 * (rdata>576 bytes) so no reply is sent.
>+				 *
>+				 * Keep only the "latest" 25 records, while
>+				 * ensuring that the PDC (0x1b) is never removed
>+				 * We do this by removing the first entry that
>+				 * isn't the 1b entry for the same name,
>+				 * on the grounds that insertion is at the end
>+				 * of the list, so the oldest entries are at
>+				 * the start.
>+				 *
>+				 */
>+				while(namerec->data.num_ips>=25) {
>+					struct name_record *name1brec = NULL;
>+
>+					DEBUG(3,("wins_process_name_registration_request: "
>+						"More than 25 IPs already in "
>+						"the list. Looking for a 1b "
>+						"record\n"));
>+
>+					/* Use the same processing as a 1b name
>+					 * query. */
>+					wins_delete_all_tmp_in_memory_records();
>+					fetch_all_active_wins_1b_names();
>+
>+					/* Per the above, find the 1b record, and then remove the first IP that isn't the same */
>+					for(name1brec = subrec->namelist;
>+							name1brec;
>+							name1brec = name1brec->next ) {
>+						if( WINS_STATE_ACTIVE(name1brec) &&
>+								name1brec->name.name_type == 0x1b) {
>+							DEBUG(3,("wins_process_name_registration_request: "
>+								"Found the #1b record "
>+								"with ip %s\n",
>+								inet_ntoa(name1brec->data.ip[0])));
>+							break;
>+						}
>+					}
>+					if(!name1brec) {
>+						DEBUG(3,("wins_process_name_registration_request: "
>+							"Didn't find a #1b name record. "
>+							"Removing the first available "
>+							"entry %s\n",
>+							inet_ntoa(namerec->data.ip[0])));
>+						remove_ip_from_name_record(namerec, namerec->data.ip[0]);
>+						wins_hook("delete", namerec, 0);
>+					} else {
>+						int i;
>+						for(i=0; i<namerec->data.num_ips; i++) {
>+							/* The name1brec should only have
>+							 * the single IP address in it,
>+							 * so we only check against the first one*/
>+							if(!ip_equal_v4( namerec->data.ip[i], name1brec->data.ip[0])) {
>+								/* The i'th entry isn't the 1b address; delete it  */
>+								DEBUG(3,("wins_process_name_registration_request: "
>+									"Entry at %d is not the #1b address. "
>+									"About to remove it\n",
>+									i));
>+								remove_ip_from_name_record(namerec, namerec->data.ip[i]);
>+								wins_hook("delete", namerec, 0);
>+								break;
>+							}
>+						}
>+					}
>+				}
>+				/* The list is guaranteed to be < 25 entries now
>+				 * - safe to add a new one  */
> 				add_ip_to_name_record(namerec, from_ip);
> 				/* we need to update the record for replication */
> 				get_global_id_and_update(&namerec->data.id, True);

Actions: View

Attachments on bug 7191: 5437 | 5443 | 5449 | 5450 | 5451 | 5459