=========================================================== == Subject: Access controlled LDAP attributes can be discovered == == CVE ID#: CVE-2023-0614 == == Versions: All Samba releases since Samba 4.7.9, 4.8.4, 4.9.7 and 4.6.16 == == Summary: The fix in the above versions for CVE-2018-10919 Confidential attribute disclosure via LDAP filters was incomplete and a viable timing attack has been demonstrated to obtain confidential BitLocker recovery keys from a Samba AD DC. =========================================================== =========== Description =========== In Active Directory, there are essentially four different classes of attributes. - Secret attributes (such as a user, computer or domain trust password) that are never disclosed and are not available to search against over LDAP. This is a hard-coded list, and in Samba these are additionally encrypted in the DB with a per-DB key. - Confidential attributes (marked as such in the schema) that have a default access restriction allowing access only to the owner of the object. - Access controlled attributes (for reads or writes), Samba will honour the access control specified in the ntSecurityDescriptor. - Public attributes for read. Most attributes in Active Directory are available to read by all authenticated users. Because the access control rules for a given attribute are not consistent between objects, Samba implemented access control restrictions only after matching objects against the filter. Taking each of the above classes in turn: - Secret attributes are prevented from disclosure firstly by redaction of the LDAP filter, and secondly by the fact that they are still encrypted during filter processing (by default). - Confidential and access controlled attributes were subject to a timing attack using LDAP filters, with this approach disclosing an access controlled value in seconds. With this security patch, for attributes mentioned in the search filter, Samba will perform a per-object access control evaluation before LDAP filter matching on the attribute, preventing unauthorised disclosure of the value of (for example) BitLocker recovery keys. It is not expected that all other timing attacks have been prevented, and it is likely still possible to determine if an object or attribute on an object is present, but not the contents. ================================== Limitations for indexed attributes ================================== Additionally, due to the nature of our object indexes, Samba must evaluate these prior to ACL checking, so read access controlled, information should not be stored in indexed attributes. Again, taking each of the above classes in turn: - Secret attributes cannot be indexed or searched for, so have always been protected - Confidential attributes are further protected, as this patch will prevent attributes marked as 'confidential' from being indexed. Search results for these will be safer, but slower. The impacted attributes on your server can be seen with: ldbsearch -U$USERNAME -H ldap://$SERVER -b CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,$BASE_DN '(&(objectClass=attributeSchema)(searchFlags:1.2.840.113556.1.4.803:=129))' lDAPDisplayName (This will normally return no results and no such attributes have this combination by default) - Access controlled attributes that are also indexed may be subject to timing attacks. The list of indexed attributes can be seen (adapt for your local environment) with: ldbsearch -U$USERNAME -H ldap://$SERVER -b CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,$BASE_DN '(&(objectClass=attributeSchema)(searchFlags:1.2.840.113556.1.4.803:=1))' lDAPDisplayName ================== Patch Availability ================== Patches addressing both these issues have been posted to: https://www.samba.org/samba/security/ Additionally, Samba $VERSIONS have been issued as security releases to correct the defect. Samba administrators are advised to upgrade to these releases or apply the patch as soon as possible. ================== CVSSv3 calculation ================== CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N (6.5) ========== Workaround ========== Do not store confidential information in Active Directory, other than passwords or keys required for AD operation (as these are in the hard-coded secret attribute list). ======= Credits ======= Originally reported by Demi Marie Obenour of Invisible Things Lab. Patches provided by Joseph Sutton of Catalyst and the Samba team, reviewed by Andrew Bartlett of Catalyst and the Samba Team. Advisory by Andrew Bartlett of Catalyst and the Samba Team ========================================================== == Our Code, Our Bugs, Our Responsibility. == The Samba Team ==========================================================