The Samba-Bugzilla – Attachment 17413 Details for
Bug 14611
CVE-2021-20251 [SECURITY] Bad password count not incremented atomically
Home
|
New
|
Browse
|
Search
|
[?]
|
Reports
|
Requests
|
Help
|
New Account
|
Log In
[x]
|
Forgot Password
Login:
[x]
[patch]
patch for master v4
auth-bug-14611-master-v4.patch (text/plain), 198.33 KB, created by
Jennifer Sutton
on 2022-07-12 08:05:27 UTC
(
hide
)
Description:
patch for master v4
Filename:
MIME Type:
Creator:
Jennifer Sutton
Created:
2022-07-12 08:05:27 UTC
Size:
198.33 KB
patch
obsolete
>From 6b88159203bd882861a91b72c94f39c9710e8371 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 15:36:26 +1200 >Subject: [PATCH 01/25] CVE-2021-20251 lib:crypto: Add des_crypt_blob_16() for > encrypting data with DES > >This lets us access single-DES from Python. This function is used in the >next commit for encrypting an NT hash to obtain the verifier for a SAMR >password change. > >BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611 > >Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >--- > lib/crypto/py_crypto.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > lib/crypto/wscript_build | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >diff --git a/lib/crypto/py_crypto.c b/lib/crypto/py_crypto.c >index ad18d3ada0f..6753d3d8e9c 100644 >--- a/lib/crypto/py_crypto.c >+++ b/lib/crypto/py_crypto.c >@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ > #include <gnutls/gnutls.h> > #include <gnutls/crypto.h> > #include "lib/crypto/gnutls_helpers.h" >+#include "libcli/auth/libcli_auth.h" > > static PyObject *py_crypto_arcfour_crypt_blob(PyObject *module, PyObject *args) > { >@@ -100,13 +101,77 @@ static PyObject *py_crypto_set_strict_mode(PyObject *module) > Py_RETURN_NONE; > } > >+static PyObject *py_crypto_des_crypt_blob_16(PyObject *self, PyObject *args) >+{ >+ PyObject *py_data = NULL; >+ uint8_t *data = NULL; >+ Py_ssize_t data_size; >+ >+ PyObject *py_key = NULL; >+ uint8_t *key = NULL; >+ Py_ssize_t key_size; >+ >+ uint8_t result[16]; >+ >+ bool ok; >+ int ret; >+ >+ ok = PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "SS", >+ &py_data, &py_key); >+ if (!ok) { >+ return NULL; >+ } >+ >+ ret = PyBytes_AsStringAndSize(py_data, >+ (char **)&data, >+ &data_size); >+ if (ret != 0) { >+ return NULL; >+ } >+ >+ ret = PyBytes_AsStringAndSize(py_key, >+ (char **)&key, >+ &key_size); >+ if (ret != 0) { >+ return NULL; >+ } >+ >+ if (data_size != 16) { >+ return PyErr_Format(PyExc_ValueError, >+ "Expected data size of 16 bytes; got %zd", >+ data_size); >+ } >+ >+ if (key_size != 14) { >+ return PyErr_Format(PyExc_ValueError, >+ "Expected key size of 14 bytes; got %zd", >+ key_size); >+ } >+ >+ ret = des_crypt112_16(result, data, key, >+ SAMBA_GNUTLS_ENCRYPT); >+ if (ret != 0) { >+ return PyErr_Format(PyExc_RuntimeError, >+ "des_crypt112_16() failed: %d", >+ ret); >+ } >+ >+ return PyBytes_FromStringAndSize((const char *)result, >+ sizeof(result)); >+} >+ > static const char py_crypto_arcfour_crypt_blob_doc[] = "arcfour_crypt_blob(data, key)\n" > "Encrypt the data with RC4 algorithm using the key"; > >+static const char py_crypto_des_crypt_blob_16_doc[] = "des_crypt_blob_16(data, key) -> bytes\n" >+ "Encrypt the 16-byte data with DES using " >+ "the 14-byte key"; >+ > static PyMethodDef py_crypto_methods[] = { > { "arcfour_crypt_blob", (PyCFunction)py_crypto_arcfour_crypt_blob, METH_VARARGS, py_crypto_arcfour_crypt_blob_doc }, > { "set_relax_mode", (PyCFunction)py_crypto_set_relax_mode, METH_NOARGS, "Set fips to relax mode" }, > { "set_strict_mode", (PyCFunction)py_crypto_set_strict_mode, METH_NOARGS, "Set fips to strict mode" }, >+ { "des_crypt_blob_16", (PyCFunction)py_crypto_des_crypt_blob_16, METH_VARARGS, py_crypto_des_crypt_blob_16_doc }, > {0}, > }; > >diff --git a/lib/crypto/wscript_build b/lib/crypto/wscript_build >index e5766042541..0d5b548e7f8 100644 >--- a/lib/crypto/wscript_build >+++ b/lib/crypto/wscript_build >@@ -50,5 +50,5 @@ bld.SAMBA_SUBSYSTEM('TORTURE_LIBCRYPTO', > > bld.SAMBA_PYTHON('python_crypto', > source='py_crypto.c', >- deps='gnutls talloc', >+ deps='gnutls talloc LIBCLI_AUTH', > realname='samba/crypto.so') >-- >2.35.0 > > >From d2742af36ed2e2b3fa1ae98539cf7f8200bc6f06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 20:48:48 +1200 >Subject: [PATCH 02/25] CVE-2021-20251 tests/krb5: Add tests for password > lockout race > >BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611 > >Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >--- > python/samba/tests/krb5/lockout_tests.py | 908 +++++++++++++++++++ > python/samba/tests/krb5/raw_testcase.py | 3 +- > python/samba/tests/krb5/rfc4120_constants.py | 1 + > python/samba/tests/usage.py | 1 + > selftest/flapping.d/ldap-pwd-change-race | 5 + > selftest/knownfail_heimdal_kdc | 11 + > selftest/knownfail_mit_kdc | 14 + > source4/selftest/tests.py | 4 + > 8 files changed, 946 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100755 python/samba/tests/krb5/lockout_tests.py > create mode 100644 selftest/flapping.d/ldap-pwd-change-race > >diff --git a/python/samba/tests/krb5/lockout_tests.py b/python/samba/tests/krb5/lockout_tests.py >new file mode 100755 >index 00000000000..f932a102249 >--- /dev/null >+++ b/python/samba/tests/krb5/lockout_tests.py >@@ -0,0 +1,908 @@ >+#!/usr/bin/env python3 >+# Unix SMB/CIFS implementation. >+# Copyright (C) Stefan Metzmacher 2020 >+# Copyright (C) Catalyst.Net Ltd >+# >+# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify >+# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by >+# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or >+# (at your option) any later version. >+# >+# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, >+# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of >+# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the >+# GNU General Public License for more details. >+# >+# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License >+# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. >+# >+ >+from concurrent import futures >+from enum import Enum >+from multiprocessing import Pipe >+import os >+import sys >+import time >+ >+from cryptography.hazmat.backends import default_backend >+from cryptography.hazmat.primitives.ciphers.base import Cipher >+from cryptography.hazmat.primitives.ciphers import algorithms >+import hashlib >+ >+import ldb >+ >+from samba import ( >+ NTSTATUSError, >+ dsdb, >+ generate_random_password, >+ ntstatus, >+ unix2nttime, >+ werror, >+) >+from samba.credentials import DONT_USE_KERBEROS, MUST_USE_KERBEROS >+from samba.crypto import des_crypt_blob_16 >+from samba.dcerpc import lsa, samr >+from samba.samdb import SamDB >+ >+from samba.tests import connect_samdb, env_get_var_value, env_loadparm >+ >+from samba.tests.krb5.as_req_tests import AsReqBaseTest >+from samba.tests.krb5 import kcrypto >+from samba.tests.krb5.kdc_base_test import KDCBaseTest >+from samba.tests.krb5.raw_testcase import KerberosCredentials >+import samba.tests.krb5.rfc4120_pyasn1 as krb5_asn1 >+from samba.tests.krb5.rfc4120_constants import ( >+ KDC_ERR_CLIENT_REVOKED, >+ KDC_ERR_PREAUTH_FAILED, >+ NT_PRINCIPAL, >+ NT_SRV_INST, >+) >+ >+sys.path.insert(0, 'bin/python') >+os.environ['PYTHONUNBUFFERED'] = '1' >+ >+global_asn1_print = False >+global_hexdump = False >+ >+ >+class ConnectionResult(Enum): >+ LOCKED_OUT = 1 >+ WRONG_PASSWORD = 2 >+ SUCCESS = 3 >+ >+ >+def connect_kdc(pipe, >+ url, >+ hostname, >+ username, >+ password, >+ domain, >+ realm, >+ workstation, >+ dn): >+ AsReqBaseTest.setUpClass() >+ as_req_base = AsReqBaseTest() >+ as_req_base.setUp() >+ >+ user_creds = KerberosCredentials() >+ user_creds.set_username(username) >+ user_creds.set_password(password) >+ user_creds.set_domain(domain) >+ user_creds.set_realm(realm) >+ user_creds.set_workstation(workstation) >+ user_creds.set_kerberos_state(DONT_USE_KERBEROS) >+ >+ user_name = user_creds.get_username() >+ cname = as_req_base.PrincipalName_create(name_type=NT_PRINCIPAL, >+ names=user_name.split('/')) >+ >+ krbtgt_creds = as_req_base.get_krbtgt_creds() >+ krbtgt_supported_etypes = krbtgt_creds.tgs_supported_enctypes >+ realm = krbtgt_creds.get_realm() >+ >+ krbtgt_account = krbtgt_creds.get_username() >+ sname = as_req_base.PrincipalName_create(name_type=NT_SRV_INST, >+ names=[krbtgt_account, realm]) >+ >+ expected_salt = user_creds.get_salt() >+ >+ till = as_req_base.get_KerberosTime(offset=36000) >+ >+ kdc_options = krb5_asn1.KDCOptions('postdated') >+ >+ preauth_key = as_req_base.PasswordKey_from_creds(user_creds, >+ kcrypto.Enctype.AES256) >+ >+ ts_enc_padata = as_req_base.get_enc_timestamp_pa_data_from_key(preauth_key) >+ padata = [ts_enc_padata] >+ >+ krbtgt_decryption_key = ( >+ as_req_base.TicketDecryptionKey_from_creds(krbtgt_creds)) >+ >+ etypes = as_req_base.get_default_enctypes() >+ >+ expected_error_modes = (KDC_ERR_CLIENT_REVOKED, >+ KDC_ERR_PREAUTH_FAILED) >+ >+ # Indicate that we're ready. This ensures we hit the right transaction >+ # lock. >+ pipe.send_bytes(b'0') >+ >+ # Wait for the main process to take out a transaction lock. >+ if not pipe.poll(timeout=5): >+ raise AssertionError('main process failed to indicate readiness') >+ >+ as_req_base.get_samdb() >+ as_req_base.get_admin_creds() >+ >+ # Try making a Kerberos AS-REQ to the KDC. This should fail, either due to >+ # the user's account being locked out or due to using the wrong password. >+ as_rep, kdc_exchange_dict = as_req_base._test_as_exchange( >+ cname=cname, >+ realm=realm, >+ sname=sname, >+ till=till, >+ client_as_etypes=etypes, >+ expected_error_mode=expected_error_modes, >+ expected_crealm=realm, >+ expected_cname=cname, >+ expected_srealm=realm, >+ expected_sname=sname, >+ expected_salt=expected_salt, >+ etypes=etypes, >+ padata=padata, >+ kdc_options=kdc_options, >+ expected_supported_etypes=krbtgt_supported_etypes, >+ expected_account_name=user_name, >+ preauth_key=preauth_key, >+ ticket_decryption_key=krbtgt_decryption_key, >+ pac_request=True) >+ as_req_base.assertIsNotNone(as_rep) >+ >+ error_code = as_rep['error-code'] >+ if error_code == KDC_ERR_CLIENT_REVOKED: >+ return ConnectionResult.LOCKED_OUT >+ elif error_code == KDC_ERR_PREAUTH_FAILED: >+ return ConnectionResult.WRONG_PASSWORD >+ else: >+ raise AssertionError(f'wrong error code {error_code}') >+ >+ >+def connect_ntlm(pipe, >+ url, >+ hostname, >+ username, >+ password, >+ domain, >+ realm, >+ workstation, >+ dn): >+ user_creds = KerberosCredentials() >+ user_creds.set_username(username) >+ user_creds.set_password(password) >+ user_creds.set_domain(domain) >+ user_creds.set_workstation(workstation) >+ user_creds.set_kerberos_state(DONT_USE_KERBEROS) >+ >+ # Indicate that we're ready. This ensures we hit the right transaction >+ # lock. >+ pipe.send_bytes(b'0') >+ >+ # Wait for the main process to take out a transaction lock. >+ if not pipe.poll(timeout=5): >+ raise AssertionError('main process failed to indicate readiness') >+ >+ # Keep trying until we get a connection. >+ for i in range(3): >+ try: >+ # Try connecting to SamDB. This should fail, either due to our >+ # account being locked out or due to using the wrong password. >+ SamDB(url=url, >+ credentials=user_creds, >+ lp=env_loadparm()) >+ except ldb.LdbError as err: >+ num, estr = err.args >+ if num == ldb.ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR and ( >+ f'NT_STATUS_ADDRESS_ALREADY_ASSOCIATED' in estr): >+ # This error can occur when we make connection attempts too >+ # rapidly and use an address that was just disconnected >+ # from. Try again. >+ continue >+ >+ if num != ldb.ERR_INVALID_CREDENTIALS: >+ raise AssertionError(f'connection raised wrong error code ' >+ f'({err})') >+ >+ if f'data {werror.WERR_ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT:x},' in estr: >+ return ConnectionResult.LOCKED_OUT >+ elif f'data {werror.WERR_LOGON_FAILURE:x},' in estr: >+ return ConnectionResult.WRONG_PASSWORD >+ else: >+ raise AssertionError(f'connection raised wrong error code ' >+ f'({estr})') >+ else: >+ return ConnectionResult.SUCCESS >+ >+ raise RuntimeError('failed to connect to SamDB') >+ >+ >+def connect_samr(pipe, >+ url, >+ hostname, >+ username, >+ password, >+ domain, >+ realm, >+ workstation, >+ dn): >+ # Get the user's NT hash. >+ user_creds = KerberosCredentials() >+ user_creds.set_password(password) >+ nt_hash = user_creds.get_nt_hash() >+ >+ # Generate a new UTF-16 password. >+ new_password = generate_random_password(32, 32) >+ new_password = new_password.encode('utf-16') >+ >+ # Generate the MD4 hash of the password. >+ md4 = hashlib.new('md4', new_password) >+ new_password_md4 = md4.digest() >+ >+ # Prefix the password with padding so it is 512 bytes long. >+ new_password_len = len(new_password) >+ remaining_len = 512 - new_password_len >+ new_password = bytes(remaining_len) + new_password >+ >+ # Append the 32-bit length of the password.. >+ new_password += int.to_bytes(new_password_len, >+ length=4, >+ byteorder='little') >+ >+ # Encrypt the password with RC4 and the existing NT hash. >+ encryptor = Cipher(algorithms.ARC4(nt_hash), >+ None, >+ default_backend()).encryptor() >+ new_password = encryptor.update(new_password) >+ >+ # Create a key from the MD4 hash of the new password. >+ key = new_password_md4[:14] >+ >+ # Encrypt the old NT hash with DES to obtain the verifier. >+ verifier = des_crypt_blob_16(nt_hash, key) >+ >+ server = lsa.String() >+ server.string = hostname >+ >+ account = lsa.String() >+ account.string = username >+ >+ nt_password = samr.CryptPassword() >+ nt_password.data = list(new_password) >+ >+ nt_verifier = samr.Password() >+ nt_verifier.hash = list(verifier) >+ >+ conn = samr.samr(f'ncacn_np:{hostname}[krb5,seal,smb2]') >+ >+ # Indicate that we're ready. This ensures we hit the right transaction >+ # lock. >+ pipe.send_bytes(b'0') >+ >+ # Wait for the main process to take out a transaction lock. >+ if not pipe.poll(timeout=5): >+ raise AssertionError('main process failed to indicate readiness') >+ >+ try: >+ # Try changing the password. This should fail, either due to our >+ # account being locked out or due to using the wrong password. >+ conn.ChangePasswordUser3(server=server, >+ account=account, >+ nt_password=nt_password, >+ nt_verifier=nt_verifier, >+ lm_change=True, >+ lm_password=None, >+ lm_verifier=None, >+ password3=None) >+ except NTSTATUSError as err: >+ num, estr = err.args >+ >+ if num == ntstatus.NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT: >+ return ConnectionResult.LOCKED_OUT >+ elif num == ntstatus.NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD: >+ return ConnectionResult.WRONG_PASSWORD >+ else: >+ raise AssertionError(f'pwd change raised wrong error code ' >+ f'({num:08X})') >+ >+ else: >+ return ConnectionResult.SUCCESS >+ >+ >+def ldap_pwd_change(pipe, >+ url, >+ hostname, >+ username, >+ password, >+ domain, >+ realm, >+ workstation, >+ dn): >+ lp = env_loadparm() >+ >+ admin_creds = KerberosCredentials() >+ admin_creds.guess(lp) >+ admin_creds.set_username(env_get_var_value('ADMIN_USERNAME')) >+ admin_creds.set_password(env_get_var_value('ADMIN_PASSWORD')) >+ admin_creds.set_kerberos_state(MUST_USE_KERBEROS) >+ >+ samdb = SamDB(url=url, >+ credentials=admin_creds, >+ lp=lp) >+ >+ old_utf16pw = f'"{password}"'.encode('utf-16-le') >+ >+ new_password = generate_random_password(32, 32) >+ new_utf16pw = f'"{new_password}"'.encode('utf-16-le') >+ >+ msg = ldb.Message(ldb.Dn(samdb, dn)) >+ msg['0'] = ldb.MessageElement(old_utf16pw, >+ ldb.FLAG_MOD_DELETE, >+ 'unicodePwd') >+ msg['1'] = ldb.MessageElement(new_utf16pw, >+ ldb.FLAG_MOD_ADD, >+ 'unicodePwd') >+ >+ # Indicate that we're ready. This ensures we hit the right transaction >+ # lock. >+ pipe.send_bytes(b'0') >+ >+ # Wait for the main process to take out a transaction lock. >+ if not pipe.poll(timeout=5): >+ raise AssertionError('main process failed to indicate readiness') >+ >+ # Try changing the user's password. This should fail, either due to the >+ # user's account being locked out or due to specifying the wrong password. >+ try: >+ samdb.modify(msg) >+ except ldb.LdbError as err: >+ num, estr = err.args >+ if num != ldb.ERR_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION: >+ raise AssertionError(f'pwd change raised wrong error code ({err})') >+ >+ if f'<{werror.WERR_ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT:08X}:' in estr: >+ return ConnectionResult.LOCKED_OUT >+ elif f'<{werror.WERR_INVALID_PASSWORD:08X}:' in estr: >+ return ConnectionResult.WRONG_PASSWORD >+ else: >+ raise AssertionError(f'pwd change raised wrong error code ' >+ f'({estr})') >+ else: >+ return ConnectionResult.SUCCESS >+ >+ >+class LockoutTests(KDCBaseTest): >+ >+ def setUp(self): >+ super().setUp() >+ self.do_asn1_print = global_asn1_print >+ self.do_hexdump = global_hexdump >+ >+ samdb = self.get_samdb() >+ base_dn = ldb.Dn(samdb, samdb.domain_dn()) >+ >+ def modify_attr(attr, value): >+ if value is None: >+ value = [] >+ flag = ldb.FLAG_MOD_DELETE >+ else: >+ value = str(value) >+ flag = ldb.FLAG_MOD_REPLACE >+ >+ msg = ldb.Message(base_dn) >+ msg[attr] = ldb.MessageElement( >+ value, flag, attr) >+ samdb.modify(msg) >+ >+ res = samdb.search(base_dn, >+ scope=ldb.SCOPE_BASE, >+ attrs=['lockoutDuration', >+ 'lockoutThreshold', >+ 'msDS-LogonTimeSyncInterval']) >+ self.assertEqual(1, len(res)) >+ >+ # Reset the lockout duration as it was before. >+ lockout_duration = res[0].get('lockoutDuration', idx=0) >+ self.addCleanup(modify_attr, 'lockoutDuration', lockout_duration) >+ >+ # Set the new lockout duration: locked out accounts now stay locked >+ # out. >+ modify_attr('lockoutDuration', 0) >+ >+ # Reset the lockout threshold as it was before. >+ lockout_threshold = res[0].get('lockoutThreshold', idx=0) >+ self.addCleanup(modify_attr, 'lockoutThreshold', lockout_threshold) >+ >+ # Set the new lockout threshold. >+ self.lockout_threshold = 3 >+ modify_attr('lockoutThreshold', self.lockout_threshold) >+ >+ # Reset the logon time sync interval as it was before. >+ sync_interval = res[0].get('msDS-LogonTimeSyncInterval', idx=0) >+ self.addCleanup(modify_attr, >+ 'msDS-LogonTimeSyncInterval', >+ sync_interval) >+ >+ # Set the new logon time sync interval. Setting it to 0 eliminates the >+ # need for this attribute to be updated on logon, and thus the >+ # requirement to take out a transaction. >+ modify_attr('msDS-LogonTimeSyncInterval', 0) >+ >+ # Get the old 'minPwdAge'. >+ minPwdAge = samdb.get_minPwdAge() >+ >+ # Reset the 'minPwdAge' as it was before. >+ self.addCleanup(samdb.set_minPwdAge, minPwdAge) >+ >+ # Set it temporarily to '0'. >+ samdb.set_minPwdAge('0') >+ >+ def assertLocalSamDB(self, samdb): >+ if samdb.url.startswith('tdb://'): >+ return >+ if samdb.url.startswith('mdb://'): >+ return >+ >+ self.fail(f'connection to {samdb.url} is not local!') >+ >+ def test_lockout_transaction_kdc(self): >+ self.do_lockout_transaction(connect_kdc) >+ >+ def test_lockout_transaction_ntlm(self): >+ self.do_lockout_transaction(connect_ntlm) >+ >+ def test_lockout_transaction_samr(self): >+ self.do_lockout_transaction(connect_samr) >+ >+ def test_lockout_transaction_ldap_pw_change(self): >+ self.do_lockout_transaction(ldap_pwd_change) >+ >+ def test_lockout_transaction_rename_kdc(self): >+ self.do_lockout_transaction(connect_kdc, rename=True) >+ >+ def test_lockout_transaction_rename_ntlm(self): >+ self.do_lockout_transaction(connect_ntlm, rename=True) >+ >+ def test_lockout_transaction_rename_samr(self): >+ self.do_lockout_transaction(connect_samr, rename=True) >+ >+ def test_lockout_transaction_rename_ldap_pw_change(self): >+ self.do_lockout_transaction(ldap_pwd_change, rename=True) >+ >+ def test_lockout_transaction_bad_pwd_kdc(self): >+ self.do_lockout_transaction(connect_kdc, correct_pw=False) >+ >+ def test_lockout_transaction_bad_pwd_ntlm(self): >+ self.do_lockout_transaction(connect_ntlm, correct_pw=False) >+ >+ def test_lockout_transaction_bad_pwd_samr(self): >+ self.do_lockout_transaction(connect_samr, correct_pw=False) >+ >+ def test_lockout_transaction_bad_pwd_ldap_pw_change(self): >+ self.do_lockout_transaction(ldap_pwd_change, correct_pw=False) >+ >+ def test_bad_pwd_count_transaction_kdc(self): >+ self.do_bad_pwd_count_transaction(connect_kdc) >+ >+ def test_bad_pwd_count_transaction_ntlm(self): >+ self.do_bad_pwd_count_transaction(connect_ntlm) >+ >+ def test_bad_pwd_count_transaction_samr(self): >+ self.do_bad_pwd_count_transaction(connect_samr) >+ >+ def test_bad_pwd_count_transaction_ldap_pw_change(self): >+ self.do_bad_pwd_count_transaction(ldap_pwd_change) >+ >+ def test_bad_pwd_count_transaction_rename_kdc(self): >+ self.do_bad_pwd_count_transaction(connect_kdc, rename=True) >+ >+ def test_bad_pwd_count_transaction_rename_ntlm(self): >+ self.do_bad_pwd_count_transaction(connect_ntlm, rename=True) >+ >+ def test_bad_pwd_count_transaction_rename_samr(self): >+ self.do_bad_pwd_count_transaction(connect_samr, rename=True) >+ >+ def test_bad_pwd_count_transaction_rename_ldap_pw_change(self): >+ self.do_bad_pwd_count_transaction(ldap_pwd_change, rename=True) >+ >+ def test_lockout_race_kdc(self): >+ self.do_lockout_race(connect_kdc) >+ >+ def test_lockout_race_ntlm(self): >+ self.do_lockout_race(connect_ntlm) >+ >+ def test_lockout_race_samr(self): >+ self.do_lockout_race(connect_samr) >+ >+ def test_lockout_race_ldap_pw_change(self): >+ self.do_lockout_race(ldap_pwd_change) >+ >+ def test_logon_without_transaction_ntlm(self): >+ self.do_logon_without_transaction(connect_ntlm) >+ >+ # Lock out the account while holding a transaction lock, then release the >+ # lock. A logon attempt already in progress should reread the account >+ # details and recognise the account is locked out. The account can >+ # additionally be renamed within the transaction to ensure that, by using >+ # the GUID, rereading the account's details still succeeds. >+ def do_lockout_transaction(self, connect_fn, >+ rename=False, >+ correct_pw=True): >+ # Create the user account for testing. >+ user_creds = self.get_cached_creds(account_type=self.AccountType.USER, >+ use_cache=False) >+ user_dn = user_creds.get_dn() >+ >+ admin_creds = self.get_admin_creds() >+ lp = self.get_lp() >+ >+ # Get a connection to our local SamDB. >+ samdb = connect_samdb(samdb_url=lp.samdb_url(), lp=lp, >+ credentials=admin_creds) >+ self.assertLocalSamDB(samdb) >+ >+ password = user_creds.get_password() >+ if not correct_pw: >+ password = password[:-1] >+ >+ # Prepare to connect to the server. >+ with futures.ProcessPoolExecutor(max_workers=1) as executor: >+ our_pipe, their_pipe = Pipe(duplex=True) >+ connect_future = executor.submit( >+ connect_fn, >+ pipe=their_pipe, >+ url=f'ldap://{samdb.host_dns_name()}', >+ hostname=samdb.host_dns_name(), >+ username=user_creds.get_username(), >+ password=password, >+ domain=user_creds.get_domain(), >+ realm=user_creds.get_realm(), >+ workstation=user_creds.get_workstation(), >+ dn=str(user_dn)) >+ >+ # Wait until the test process indicates it's ready. >+ self.assertTrue(our_pipe.poll(timeout=5), >+ 'test failed to indicate readiness') >+ >+ # Take out a transaction. >+ samdb.transaction_start() >+ try: >+ # Lock out the account. We must do it using an actual password >+ # check like so, rather than directly with a database >+ # modification, so that the account is also added to the >+ # auxiliary bad password database. >+ >+ old_utf16pw = f'"Secret007"'.encode('utf-16-le') # invalid pwd >+ new_utf16pw = f'"Secret008"'.encode('utf-16-le') >+ >+ msg = ldb.Message(user_dn) >+ msg['0'] = ldb.MessageElement(old_utf16pw, >+ ldb.FLAG_MOD_DELETE, >+ 'unicodePwd') >+ msg['1'] = ldb.MessageElement(new_utf16pw, >+ ldb.FLAG_MOD_ADD, >+ 'unicodePwd') >+ >+ for i in range(self.lockout_threshold): >+ try: >+ samdb.modify(msg) >+ except ldb.LdbError as err: >+ num, estr = err.args >+ >+ # We get an error, but the bad password count should >+ # still be updated. >+ self.assertEqual(num, ldb.ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR) >+ self.assertEqual('Failed to obtain remote address for ' >+ 'the LDAP client while changing the ' >+ 'password', >+ estr) >+ else: >+ self.fail('pwd change should have failed') >+ >+ # Ensure the account is locked out. >+ >+ res = samdb.search( >+ user_dn, scope=ldb.SCOPE_BASE, >+ attrs=['msDS-User-Account-Control-Computed']) >+ self.assertEqual(1, len(res)) >+ >+ uac = int(res[0].get('msDS-User-Account-Control-Computed', >+ idx=0)) >+ self.assertTrue(uac & dsdb.UF_LOCKOUT) >+ >+ # Now the bad password database has been updated, inform the >+ # test process that it may proceed. >+ our_pipe.send_bytes(b'0') >+ >+ # Wait one second to ensure the test process hits the >+ # transaction lock. >+ time.sleep(1) >+ >+ if rename: >+ # While we're at it, rename the account to ensure that is >+ # also safe if a race occurs. >+ msg = ldb.Message(user_dn) >+ new_username = self.get_new_username() >+ msg['sAMAccountName'] = ldb.MessageElement( >+ new_username, >+ ldb.FLAG_MOD_REPLACE, >+ 'sAMAccountName') >+ samdb.modify(msg) >+ >+ except Exception: >+ samdb.transaction_cancel() >+ raise >+ >+ # Commit the local transaction. >+ samdb.transaction_commit() >+ >+ result = connect_future.result(timeout=5) >+ self.assertEqual(result, ConnectionResult.LOCKED_OUT) >+ >+ # Update the bad password count while holding a transaction lock, then >+ # release the lock. A logon attempt already in progress should reread the >+ # account details and ensure the bad password count is atomically >+ # updated. The account can additionally be renamed within the transaction >+ # to ensure that, by using the GUID, rereading the account's details still >+ # succeeds. >+ def do_bad_pwd_count_transaction(self, connect_fn, rename=False): >+ # Create the user account for testing. >+ user_creds = self.get_cached_creds(account_type=self.AccountType.USER, >+ use_cache=False) >+ user_dn = user_creds.get_dn() >+ >+ admin_creds = self.get_admin_creds() >+ lp = self.get_lp() >+ >+ # Get a connection to our local SamDB. >+ samdb = connect_samdb(samdb_url=lp.samdb_url(), lp=lp, >+ credentials=admin_creds) >+ self.assertLocalSamDB(samdb) >+ >+ # Prepare to connect to the server with an invalid password. >+ with futures.ProcessPoolExecutor(max_workers=1) as executor: >+ our_pipe, their_pipe = Pipe(duplex=True) >+ connect_future = executor.submit( >+ connect_fn, >+ pipe=their_pipe, >+ url=f'ldap://{samdb.host_dns_name()}', >+ hostname=samdb.host_dns_name(), >+ username=user_creds.get_username(), >+ password=user_creds.get_password()[:-1], # invalid password >+ domain=user_creds.get_domain(), >+ realm=user_creds.get_realm(), >+ workstation=user_creds.get_workstation(), >+ dn=str(user_dn)) >+ >+ # Wait until the test process indicates it's ready. >+ self.assertTrue(our_pipe.poll(timeout=5), >+ 'test failed to indicate readiness') >+ >+ # Take out a transaction. >+ samdb.transaction_start() >+ try: >+ # Inform the test process that it may proceed. >+ our_pipe.send_bytes(b'0') >+ >+ # Wait one second to ensure the test process hits the >+ # transaction lock. >+ time.sleep(1) >+ >+ # Set badPwdCount to 1. >+ msg = ldb.Message(user_dn) >+ now = int(time.time()) >+ bad_pwd_time = unix2nttime(now) >+ msg['badPwdCount'] = ldb.MessageElement( >+ '1', >+ ldb.FLAG_MOD_REPLACE, >+ 'badPwdCount') >+ msg['badPasswordTime'] = ldb.MessageElement( >+ str(bad_pwd_time), >+ ldb.FLAG_MOD_REPLACE, >+ 'badPasswordTime') >+ if rename: >+ # While we're at it, rename the account to ensure that is >+ # also safe if a race occurs. >+ new_username = self.get_new_username() >+ msg['sAMAccountName'] = ldb.MessageElement( >+ new_username, >+ ldb.FLAG_MOD_REPLACE, >+ 'sAMAccountName') >+ samdb.modify(msg) >+ >+ # Ensure the account is not yet locked out. >+ >+ res = samdb.search( >+ user_dn, scope=ldb.SCOPE_BASE, >+ attrs=['msDS-User-Account-Control-Computed']) >+ self.assertEqual(1, len(res)) >+ >+ uac = int(res[0].get('msDS-User-Account-Control-Computed', >+ idx=0)) >+ self.assertFalse(uac & dsdb.UF_LOCKOUT) >+ except Exception: >+ samdb.transaction_cancel() >+ raise >+ >+ # Commit the local transaction. >+ samdb.transaction_commit() >+ >+ result = connect_future.result(timeout=5) >+ self.assertEqual(result, ConnectionResult.WRONG_PASSWORD, result) >+ >+ # Check that badPwdCount has now increased to 2. >+ >+ res = samdb.search(user_dn, >+ scope=ldb.SCOPE_BASE, >+ attrs=['badPwdCount']) >+ self.assertEqual(1, len(res)) >+ >+ bad_pwd_count = int(res[0].get('badPwdCount', idx=0)) >+ self.assertEqual(2, bad_pwd_count) >+ >+ # Attempt to log in to the account with an incorrect password, using >+ # lockoutThreshold+1 simultaneous attempts. We should get three 'wrong >+ # password' errors and one 'locked out' error, showing that the bad >+ # password count is checked and incremented atomically. >+ def do_lockout_race(self, connect_fn): >+ # Create the user account for testing. >+ user_creds = self.get_cached_creds(account_type=self.AccountType.USER, >+ use_cache=False) >+ user_dn = user_creds.get_dn() >+ >+ admin_creds = self.get_admin_creds() >+ lp = self.get_lp() >+ >+ # Get a connection to our local SamDB. >+ samdb = connect_samdb(samdb_url=lp.samdb_url(), lp=lp, >+ credentials=admin_creds) >+ self.assertLocalSamDB(samdb) >+ >+ # Prepare to connect to the server with an invalid password, using four >+ # simultaneous requests. Only three of those attempts should get >+ # through before the account is locked out. >+ num_attempts = self.lockout_threshold + 1 >+ with futures.ProcessPoolExecutor(max_workers=num_attempts) as executor: >+ connect_futures = [] >+ our_pipes = [] >+ for i in range(num_attempts): >+ our_pipe, their_pipe = Pipe(duplex=True) >+ our_pipes.append(our_pipe) >+ >+ connect_future = executor.submit( >+ connect_fn, >+ pipe=their_pipe, >+ url=f'ldap://{samdb.host_dns_name()}', >+ hostname=samdb.host_dns_name(), >+ username=user_creds.get_username(), >+ password=user_creds.get_password()[:-1], # invalid pw >+ domain=user_creds.get_domain(), >+ realm=user_creds.get_realm(), >+ workstation=user_creds.get_workstation(), >+ dn=str(user_dn)) >+ connect_futures.append(connect_future) >+ >+ self.assertTrue(our_pipe.poll(timeout=5), >+ f'process {i} failed to indicate readiness') >+ >+ # Take out a transaction. >+ samdb.transaction_start() >+ try: >+ # Inform the test processes that they may proceed. >+ for our_pipe in our_pipes: >+ our_pipe.send_bytes(b'0') >+ >+ # Wait one second to ensure the test processes hit the >+ # transaction lock. >+ time.sleep(1) >+ except Exception: >+ samdb.transaction_cancel() >+ raise >+ >+ # Commit the local transaction. >+ samdb.transaction_commit() >+ >+ lockouts = 0 >+ wrong_passwords = 0 >+ for i, connect_future in enumerate(connect_futures): >+ result = connect_future.result(timeout=5) >+ if result == ConnectionResult.LOCKED_OUT: >+ lockouts += 1 >+ elif result == ConnectionResult.WRONG_PASSWORD: >+ wrong_passwords += 1 >+ else: >+ self.fail(f'process {i} gave an unexpected result ' >+ f'{result}') >+ >+ self.assertEqual(wrong_passwords, self.lockout_threshold) >+ self.assertEqual(lockouts, num_attempts - self.lockout_threshold) >+ >+ # Ensure the account is now locked out. >+ >+ res = samdb.search( >+ user_dn, scope=ldb.SCOPE_BASE, >+ attrs=['badPwdCount', >+ 'msDS-User-Account-Control-Computed']) >+ self.assertEqual(1, len(res)) >+ >+ bad_pwd_count = int(res[0].get('badPwdCount', idx=0)) >+ self.assertEqual(self.lockout_threshold, bad_pwd_count) >+ >+ uac = int(res[0].get('msDS-User-Account-Control-Computed', >+ idx=0)) >+ self.assertTrue(uac & dsdb.UF_LOCKOUT) >+ >+ # Test that logon is possible even while we locally hold a transaction >+ # lock. This test only works with NTLM authentication; Kerberos >+ # authentication must take out a transaction to update the logonCount >+ # attribute, and LDAP and SAMR password changes both take out a transaction >+ # to effect the password change. NTLM is the only logon method that does >+ # not require a transaction, and can thus be performed while we're holding >+ # the lock. >+ def do_logon_without_transaction(self, connect_fn): >+ # Create the user account for testing. >+ user_creds = self.get_cached_creds(account_type=self.AccountType.USER, >+ use_cache=False) >+ user_dn = user_creds.get_dn() >+ >+ admin_creds = self.get_admin_creds() >+ lp = self.get_lp() >+ >+ # Get a connection to our local SamDB. >+ samdb = connect_samdb(samdb_url=lp.samdb_url(), lp=lp, >+ credentials=admin_creds) >+ self.assertLocalSamDB(samdb) >+ >+ password = user_creds.get_password() >+ >+ # Prepare to connect to the server with a valid password. >+ with futures.ProcessPoolExecutor(max_workers=1) as executor: >+ our_pipe, their_pipe = Pipe(duplex=True) >+ connect_future = executor.submit( >+ connect_fn, >+ pipe=their_pipe, >+ url=f'ldap://{samdb.host_dns_name()}', >+ hostname=samdb.host_dns_name(), >+ username=user_creds.get_username(), >+ password=password, >+ domain=user_creds.get_domain(), >+ realm=user_creds.get_realm(), >+ workstation=user_creds.get_workstation(), >+ dn=str(user_dn)) >+ >+ # Wait until the test process indicates it's ready. >+ self.assertTrue(our_pipe.poll(timeout=5), >+ 'test failed to indicate readiness') >+ >+ # Take out a transaction. >+ samdb.transaction_start() >+ try: >+ # Inform the test process that it may proceed. >+ our_pipe.send_bytes(b'0') >+ >+ # The connection should succeed, despite our holding a >+ # transaction. >+ result = connect_future.result(timeout=5) >+ self.assertEqual(result, ConnectionResult.SUCCESS) >+ except Exception: >+ samdb.transaction_cancel() >+ raise >+ >+ # Commit the local transaction. >+ samdb.transaction_commit() >+ >+ >+if __name__ == '__main__': >+ global_asn1_print = False >+ global_hexdump = False >+ import unittest >+ unittest.main() >diff --git a/python/samba/tests/krb5/raw_testcase.py b/python/samba/tests/krb5/raw_testcase.py >index 7f9d9d17640..e35ee3e597d 100644 >--- a/python/samba/tests/krb5/raw_testcase.py >+++ b/python/samba/tests/krb5/raw_testcase.py >@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ from samba.tests.krb5.rfc4120_constants import ( > AD_IF_RELEVANT, > AD_WIN2K_PAC, > FX_FAST_ARMOR_AP_REQUEST, >+ KDC_ERR_CLIENT_REVOKED, > KDC_ERR_GENERIC, > KDC_ERR_POLICY, > KDC_ERR_PREAUTH_FAILED, >@@ -3138,7 +3139,7 @@ class RawKerberosTest(TestCaseInTempDir): > expected_patypes += (PADATA_ETYPE_INFO2,) > > if error_code not in (KDC_ERR_PREAUTH_FAILED, KDC_ERR_SKEW, >- KDC_ERR_POLICY): >+ KDC_ERR_POLICY, KDC_ERR_CLIENT_REVOKED): > if sent_fast: > expected_patypes += (PADATA_ENCRYPTED_CHALLENGE,) > else: >diff --git a/python/samba/tests/krb5/rfc4120_constants.py b/python/samba/tests/krb5/rfc4120_constants.py >index 28d83407ac5..a68fc64a6a3 100644 >--- a/python/samba/tests/krb5/rfc4120_constants.py >+++ b/python/samba/tests/krb5/rfc4120_constants.py >@@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ KDC_ERR_POLICY = 12 > KDC_ERR_BADOPTION = 13 > KDC_ERR_ETYPE_NOSUPP = 14 > KDC_ERR_SUMTYPE_NOSUPP = 15 >+KDC_ERR_CLIENT_REVOKED = 18 > KDC_ERR_TGT_REVOKED = 20 > KDC_ERR_PREAUTH_FAILED = 24 > KDC_ERR_PREAUTH_REQUIRED = 25 >diff --git a/python/samba/tests/usage.py b/python/samba/tests/usage.py >index 9297247152a..67b4e9f7b96 100644 >--- a/python/samba/tests/usage.py >+++ b/python/samba/tests/usage.py >@@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ EXCLUDE_USAGE = { > 'python/samba/tests/krb5/pac_align_tests.py', > 'python/samba/tests/krb5/protected_users_tests.py', > 'python/samba/tests/krb5/nt_hash_tests.py', >+ 'python/samba/tests/krb5/lockout_tests.py', > } > > EXCLUDE_HELP = { >diff --git a/selftest/flapping.d/ldap-pwd-change-race b/selftest/flapping.d/ldap-pwd-change-race >new file mode 100644 >index 00000000000..54ed56c1134 >--- /dev/null >+++ b/selftest/flapping.d/ldap-pwd-change-race >@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ >+# This test currently depends on a race. The password_hash dsdb module >+# relinquishes and immediately reacquires a transaction lock, and another >+# process may be able to acquire it during the short period of time in which it >+# is not held. >+^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_lockout_race_ldap_pw_change.ad_dc:local >diff --git a/selftest/knownfail_heimdal_kdc b/selftest/knownfail_heimdal_kdc >index 4ae27eacb09..d3e2997387d 100644 >--- a/selftest/knownfail_heimdal_kdc >+++ b/selftest/knownfail_heimdal_kdc >@@ -54,3 +54,14 @@ > ^samba.tests.krb5.protected_users_tests.samba.tests.krb5.protected_users_tests.ProtectedUsersTests.test_proxiable_as_protected.ad_dc > # > ^samba.tests.krb5.protected_users_tests.samba.tests.krb5.protected_users_tests.ProtectedUsersTests.test_samr_change_password_protected.ad_dc >+# >+# Lockout tests >+# >+^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_bad_pwd_count_transaction_kdc.ad_dc:local >+^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_bad_pwd_count_transaction_ntlm.ad_dc:local >+^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_bad_pwd_count_transaction_rename_kdc.ad_dc:local >+^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_bad_pwd_count_transaction_rename_ntlm.ad_dc:local >+^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_bad_pwd_count_transaction_rename_samr.ad_dc:local >+^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_bad_pwd_count_transaction_samr.ad_dc:local >+^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_lockout_race_kdc.ad_dc:local >+^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_lockout_race_ntlm.ad_dc:local >diff --git a/selftest/knownfail_mit_kdc b/selftest/knownfail_mit_kdc >index 9b55627bbc8..f5a2fea79c8 100644 >--- a/selftest/knownfail_mit_kdc >+++ b/selftest/knownfail_mit_kdc >@@ -433,3 +433,17 @@ samba.tests.krb5.as_canonicalization_tests.samba.tests.krb5.as_canonicalization_ > ^samba.tests.krb5.protected_users_tests.samba.tests.krb5.protected_users_tests.ProtectedUsersTests.test_ts_rc4_not_protected.ad_dc > ^samba.tests.krb5.protected_users_tests.samba.tests.krb5.protected_users_tests.ProtectedUsersTests.test_ts_rc4_protected.ad_dc > ^samba.tests.krb5.protected_users_tests.samba.tests.krb5.protected_users_tests.ProtectedUsersTests.test_ts_rc4_protected_nested.ad_dc >+# >+# Lockout tests >+# >+^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_bad_pwd_count_transaction_kdc.ad_dc:local >+^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_bad_pwd_count_transaction_ntlm.ad_dc:local >+^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_bad_pwd_count_transaction_rename_kdc.ad_dc:local >+^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_bad_pwd_count_transaction_rename_ntlm.ad_dc:local >+^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_bad_pwd_count_transaction_rename_samr.ad_dc:local >+^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_bad_pwd_count_transaction_samr.ad_dc:local >+^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_lockout_race_kdc.ad_dc:local >+^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_lockout_race_ntlm.ad_dc:local >+^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_lockout_transaction_bad_pwd_kdc.ad_dc:local >+^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_lockout_transaction_kdc.ad_dc:local >+^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_lockout_transaction_rename_kdc.ad_dc:local >diff --git a/source4/selftest/tests.py b/source4/selftest/tests.py >index 070879e6e44..d815bba4a13 100755 >--- a/source4/selftest/tests.py >+++ b/source4/selftest/tests.py >@@ -1703,6 +1703,10 @@ for env, nt_hash in [("ad_dc:local", True), > **krb5_environ, > 'EXPECT_NT_HASH': int(nt_hash), > }) >+planoldpythontestsuite( >+ 'ad_dc:local', >+ 'samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests', >+ environ=krb5_environ) > > for env in [ > 'vampire_dc', >-- >2.35.0 > > >From 8901515c8deecf4b20962882c1f504321913110d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> >Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 10:51:26 +1300 >Subject: [PATCH 03/25] CVE-2021-20251 s4-rpc_server: Use > authsam_search_account() to find the user > >This helps the bad password and audit log handling code as it >allows assumptions to be made about the attributes found in >the variable "msg", such as that DSDB_SEARCH_SHOW_EXTENDED_DN >was used. > >This ensures we can re-search on the DN via the embedded GUID, >which in in turn rename-proof. > >BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611 > >Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> >Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >--- > source4/rpc_server/samr/samr_password.c | 40 +++++++++++-------------- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/source4/rpc_server/samr/samr_password.c b/source4/rpc_server/samr/samr_password.c >index 0ac5a5a17e1..70f969ffdf0 100644 >--- a/source4/rpc_server/samr/samr_password.c >+++ b/source4/rpc_server/samr/samr_password.c >@@ -124,13 +124,7 @@ NTSTATUS dcesrv_samr_ChangePasswordUser3(struct dcesrv_call_state *dce_call, > struct ldb_context *sam_ctx = NULL; > struct ldb_dn *user_dn = NULL; > int ret; >- struct ldb_result *res = NULL; >- const char * const attrs[] = { "unicodePwd", "dBCSPwd", >- "userAccountControl", >- "msDS-ResultantPSO", >- "msDS-User-Account-Control-Computed", >- "badPwdCount", "badPasswordTime", >- "objectSid", NULL }; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; > struct samr_Password *nt_pwd; > struct samr_DomInfo1 *dominfo = NULL; > struct userPwdChangeFailureInformation *reject = NULL; >@@ -168,26 +162,26 @@ NTSTATUS dcesrv_samr_ChangePasswordUser3(struct dcesrv_call_state *dce_call, > return NT_STATUS_INVALID_SYSTEM_SERVICE; > } > >- /* we need the users dn and the domain dn (derived from the >- user SID). We also need the current lm and nt password hashes >- in order to decrypt the incoming passwords */ >- ret = dsdb_search(sam_ctx, mem_ctx, &res, >- ldb_get_default_basedn(sam_ctx), >- LDB_SCOPE_SUBTREE, attrs, >- DSDB_SEARCH_SHOW_EXTENDED_DN, >- "(&(sAMAccountName=%s)(objectclass=user))", >- ldb_binary_encode_string(mem_ctx, r->in.account->string)); >- if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS || res->count != 1) { >- status = NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER; /* Converted to WRONG_PASSWORD below */ >+ /* >+ * We use authsam_search_account() to be consistent with the >+ * other callers in the bad password and audit log handling >+ * systems. It ensures we get DSDB_SEARCH_SHOW_EXTENDED_DN. >+ */ >+ status = authsam_search_account(mem_ctx, >+ sam_ctx, >+ r->in.account->string, >+ ldb_get_default_basedn(sam_ctx), >+ &msg); >+ if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { > goto failed; > } > >- user_dn = res->msgs[0]->dn; >- user_samAccountName = ldb_msg_find_attr_as_string(res->msgs[0], "samAccountName", NULL); >- user_objectSid = samdb_result_dom_sid(res, res->msgs[0], "objectSid"); >+ user_dn = msg->dn; >+ user_samAccountName = ldb_msg_find_attr_as_string(msg, "samAccountName", NULL); >+ user_objectSid = samdb_result_dom_sid(mem_ctx, msg, "objectSid"); > > status = samdb_result_passwords(mem_ctx, lp_ctx, >- res->msgs[0], &nt_pwd); >+ msg, &nt_pwd); > if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status) ) { > goto failed; > } >@@ -303,7 +297,7 @@ failed: > > /* Only update the badPwdCount if we found the user */ > if (NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD)) { >- authsam_update_bad_pwd_count(sam_ctx, res->msgs[0], ldb_get_default_basedn(sam_ctx)); >+ authsam_update_bad_pwd_count(sam_ctx, msg, ldb_get_default_basedn(sam_ctx)); > } else if (NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER)) { > /* Don't give the game away: (don't allow anonymous users to prove the existence of usernames) */ > status = NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD; >-- >2.35.0 > > >From 8618ab0dc8b498dbf936d0571045c7ee5e0d1205 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz> >Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 10:52:58 +1300 >Subject: [PATCH 04/25] CVE-2021-20251 auth4: split > samdb_result_msds_LockoutObservationWindow() out > >samdb_result_msds_LockoutObservationWindow() is split out of >samdb_result_effective_badPwdCount() > >BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611 > >Signed-off-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz> >Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >--- > source4/dsdb/common/util.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/source4/dsdb/common/util.c b/source4/dsdb/common/util.c >index 54997c2ad75..19667ee8611 100644 >--- a/source4/dsdb/common/util.c >+++ b/source4/dsdb/common/util.c >@@ -5291,9 +5291,9 @@ int dsdb_create_partial_replica_NC(struct ldb_context *ldb, struct ldb_dn *dn) > * This also requires that the domain_msg have (if present): > * - lockOutObservationWindow > */ >-static int dsdb_effective_badPwdCount(const struct ldb_message *user_msg, >- int64_t lockOutObservationWindow, >- NTTIME now) >+int dsdb_effective_badPwdCount(const struct ldb_message *user_msg, >+ int64_t lockOutObservationWindow, >+ NTTIME now) > { > int64_t badPasswordTime; > badPasswordTime = ldb_msg_find_attr_as_int64(user_msg, "badPasswordTime", 0); >@@ -5340,25 +5340,24 @@ static struct ldb_result *lookup_user_pso(struct ldb_context *sam_ldb, > } > > /* >- * Return the effective badPwdCount >+ * Return the msDS-LockoutObservationWindow for a user message > * > * This requires that the user_msg have (if present): >- * - badPasswordTime >- * - badPwdCount > * - msDS-ResultantPSO > */ >-int samdb_result_effective_badPwdCount(struct ldb_context *sam_ldb, >- TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, >- struct ldb_dn *domain_dn, >- const struct ldb_message *user_msg) >+int64_t samdb_result_msds_LockoutObservationWindow( >+ struct ldb_context *sam_ldb, >+ TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, >+ struct ldb_dn *domain_dn, >+ const struct ldb_message *user_msg) > { >- struct timeval tv_now = timeval_current(); >- NTTIME now = timeval_to_nttime(&tv_now); > int64_t lockOutObservationWindow; > struct ldb_result *res = NULL; > const char *attrs[] = { "msDS-LockoutObservationWindow", > NULL }; >- >+ if (domain_dn == NULL) { >+ smb_panic("domain dn is NULL"); >+ } > res = lookup_user_pso(sam_ldb, mem_ctx, user_msg, attrs); > > if (res != NULL) { >@@ -5374,7 +5373,27 @@ int samdb_result_effective_badPwdCount(struct ldb_context *sam_ldb, > samdb_search_int64(sam_ldb, mem_ctx, 0, domain_dn, > "lockOutObservationWindow", NULL); > } >+ return lockOutObservationWindow; >+} > >+/* >+ * Return the effective badPwdCount >+ * >+ * This requires that the user_msg have (if present): >+ * - badPasswordTime >+ * - badPwdCount >+ * - msDS-ResultantPSO >+ */ >+int samdb_result_effective_badPwdCount(struct ldb_context *sam_ldb, >+ TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, >+ struct ldb_dn *domain_dn, >+ const struct ldb_message *user_msg) >+{ >+ struct timeval tv_now = timeval_current(); >+ NTTIME now = timeval_to_nttime(&tv_now); >+ int64_t lockOutObservationWindow = >+ samdb_result_msds_LockoutObservationWindow( >+ sam_ldb, mem_ctx, domain_dn, user_msg); > return dsdb_effective_badPwdCount(user_msg, lockOutObservationWindow, now); > } > >-- >2.35.0 > > >From 288cb06f6abf54261efc28d31faeba4b8d37b4af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz> >Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 14:24:58 +1300 >Subject: [PATCH 05/25] CVE-2021-20251 s4 auth: Prepare to make bad password > count increment atomic > >To ensure that the bad password count is incremented atomically, >and that the successful logon accounting data is updated atomically, >without always opening a transaction, we will need to make a note >of all bad and successful passwords in a side-DB outside the >transaction lock. > >This provides the functions needed for that and hooks them in >(future commits will handle errors and use the results). > >Based on patches by Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz> > >BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611 > >Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> >Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >--- > source4/auth/sam.c | 187 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 187 insertions(+) > >diff --git a/source4/auth/sam.c b/source4/auth/sam.c >index 4bbf9aadc81..37f60f7b80f 100644 >--- a/source4/auth/sam.c >+++ b/source4/auth/sam.c >@@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ > #include "libcli/ldap/ldap_ndr.h" > #include "param/param.h" > #include "librpc/gen_ndr/ndr_winbind_c.h" >+#include "lib/dbwrap/dbwrap.h" >+#include "cluster/cluster.h" > > #undef DBGC_CLASS > #define DBGC_CLASS DBGC_AUTH >@@ -825,6 +827,177 @@ static int authsam_get_user_pso(struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, > return LDB_SUCCESS; > } > >+static struct db_context *authsam_get_bad_password_db( >+ TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, >+ struct ldb_context *sam_ctx) >+{ >+ struct loadparm_context *lp_ctx = NULL; >+ const char *db_name = "bad_password"; >+ struct db_context *db_ctx = NULL; >+ >+ lp_ctx = ldb_get_opaque(sam_ctx, "loadparm"); >+ if (lp_ctx == NULL) { >+ DBG_ERR("Unable to get loadparm_context\n"); >+ return NULL; >+ } >+ >+ db_ctx = cluster_db_tmp_open(mem_ctx, lp_ctx, db_name, TDB_DEFAULT); >+ if (db_ctx == NULL) { >+ DBG_ERR("Unable to open bad password attempts database\n"); >+ return NULL; >+ } >+ return db_ctx; >+} >+ >+static NTSTATUS get_object_sid_as_tdb_data( >+ TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, >+ const struct ldb_message *msg, >+ struct dom_sid_buf *buf, >+ TDB_DATA *key) >+{ >+ struct dom_sid *objectsid = NULL; >+ >+ /* >+ * Convert the objectSID to a human readable form to >+ * make debugging easier >+ */ >+ objectsid = samdb_result_dom_sid(mem_ctx, msg, "objectSID"); >+ if (objectsid == NULL) { >+ DBG_ERR("Unable to extract objectSID\n"); >+ return NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR; >+ } >+ dom_sid_str_buf(objectsid, buf); >+ key->dptr = (unsigned char *)buf->buf; >+ key->dsize = strlen(buf->buf); >+ >+ talloc_free(objectsid); >+ >+ return NT_STATUS_OK; >+} >+ >+/* >+ * Add the users objectSID to the bad password attempt database >+ * to indicate that last authentication failed due to a bad password >+ */ >+static NTSTATUS authsam_set_bad_password_indicator( >+ struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, >+ TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, >+ const struct ldb_message *msg) >+{ >+ NTSTATUS status = NT_STATUS_OK; >+ struct dom_sid_buf buf; >+ TDB_DATA key = {0}; >+ TDB_DATA value = {0}; >+ struct db_context *db = NULL; >+ >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = talloc_new(mem_ctx); >+ if (ctx == NULL) { >+ return NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY; >+ } >+ >+ db = authsam_get_bad_password_db(ctx, sam_ctx); >+ if (db == NULL) { >+ status = NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR; >+ goto exit; >+ } >+ >+ status = get_object_sid_as_tdb_data(ctx, msg, &buf, &key); >+ if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { >+ goto exit; >+ } >+ >+ status = dbwrap_store(db, key, value, 0); >+ if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { >+ DBG_ERR("Unable to store bad password indicator\n"); >+ } >+exit: >+ talloc_free(ctx); >+ return status; >+} >+ >+/* >+ * see if the users objectSID is in the bad password attempt database >+ */ >+static NTSTATUS authsam_check_bad_password_indicator( >+ struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, >+ TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, >+ bool *exists, >+ const struct ldb_message *msg) >+{ >+ NTSTATUS status = NT_STATUS_OK; >+ struct dom_sid_buf buf; >+ TDB_DATA key = {0}; >+ struct db_context *db = NULL; >+ >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = talloc_new(mem_ctx); >+ if (ctx == NULL) { >+ return NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY; >+ } >+ >+ db = authsam_get_bad_password_db(ctx, sam_ctx); >+ if (db == NULL) { >+ status = NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR; >+ goto exit; >+ } >+ >+ status = get_object_sid_as_tdb_data(ctx, msg, &buf, &key); >+ if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { >+ goto exit; >+ } >+ >+ *exists = dbwrap_exists(db, key); >+exit: >+ talloc_free(ctx); >+ return status; >+} >+ >+/* >+ * Remove the users objectSID to the bad password attempt database >+ * to indicate that last authentication succeeded. >+ */ >+static NTSTATUS authsam_clear_bad_password_indicator( >+ struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, >+ TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, >+ const struct ldb_message *msg) >+{ >+ NTSTATUS status = NT_STATUS_OK; >+ struct dom_sid_buf buf; >+ TDB_DATA key = {0}; >+ struct db_context *db = NULL; >+ >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = talloc_new(mem_ctx); >+ if (ctx == NULL) { >+ return NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY; >+ } >+ >+ db = authsam_get_bad_password_db(ctx, sam_ctx); >+ if (db == NULL) { >+ status = NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR; >+ goto exit; >+ } >+ >+ status = get_object_sid_as_tdb_data(ctx, msg, &buf, &key); >+ if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { >+ goto exit; >+ } >+ >+ status = dbwrap_delete(db, key); >+ if (NT_STATUS_EQUAL(NT_STATUS_NOT_FOUND, status)) { >+ /* >+ * Ok there was no bad password indicator this is expected >+ */ >+ status = NT_STATUS_OK; >+ } >+ if (NT_STATUS_IS_ERR(status)) { >+ DBG_ERR("Unable to delete bad password indicator, %s %s\n", >+ nt_errstr(status), >+ get_friendly_nt_error_msg(status)); >+ } >+exit: >+ talloc_free(ctx); >+ return status; >+} >+ > NTSTATUS authsam_update_bad_pwd_count(struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, > struct ldb_message *msg, > struct ldb_dn *domain_dn) >@@ -894,6 +1067,10 @@ NTSTATUS authsam_update_bad_pwd_count(struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, > > ret = dsdb_autotransaction_request(sam_ctx, req); > talloc_free(req); >+ >+ status = authsam_set_bad_password_indicator( >+ sam_ctx, mem_ctx, msg); >+ /* Failure is ignored for now */ > } > > done: >@@ -1057,12 +1234,19 @@ NTSTATUS authsam_logon_success_accounting(struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, > NTTIME now; > NTTIME lastLogonTimestamp; > bool am_rodc = false; >+ bool need_db_reread; > > mem_ctx = talloc_new(msg); > if (mem_ctx == NULL) { > return NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY; > } > >+ status = authsam_check_bad_password_indicator( >+ sam_ctx, mem_ctx, &need_db_reread, msg); >+ if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { >+ return status; >+ } >+ > lockoutTime = ldb_msg_find_attr_as_int64(msg, "lockoutTime", 0); > dbBadPwdCount = ldb_msg_find_attr_as_int(msg, "badPwdCount", 0); > if (interactive_or_kerberos) { >@@ -1197,6 +1381,9 @@ NTSTATUS authsam_logon_success_accounting(struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, > talloc_free(req); > } > >+ status = authsam_clear_bad_password_indicator(sam_ctx, mem_ctx, msg); >+ /* Failure is ignored for now */ >+ > done: > if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { > DEBUG(0, ("Failed to set badPwdCount and lockoutTime " >-- >2.35.0 > > >From 2dee23e21e3fa482ea484b03a7f3044736f6f6fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> >Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 17:57:10 +1300 >Subject: [PATCH 06/25] CVE-2021-20251 auth4: Reread the user record if a bad > password is noticed. > >As is, this is pointless, as we need a transaction to make this >any less of a race, but this provides the steps towards that goal. > >BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611 > >Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> >Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >--- > source4/auth/sam.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+) > >diff --git a/source4/auth/sam.c b/source4/auth/sam.c >index 37f60f7b80f..85a23075c4e 100644 >--- a/source4/auth/sam.c >+++ b/source4/auth/sam.c >@@ -827,6 +827,68 @@ static int authsam_get_user_pso(struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, > return LDB_SUCCESS; > } > >+/* >+ * Re-read the bad password and successful logon data for a user. >+ * >+ * the passed user record, must contain the "objectGUID", as this is >+ * used as the re-read key >+ */ >+NTSTATUS authsam_reread_user_logon_data( >+ struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, >+ TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, >+ const struct ldb_message *user_msg, >+ struct ldb_message **current) >+{ >+ const struct ldb_val *v = NULL; >+ struct ldb_result *res = NULL; >+ uint16_t acct_flags = 0; >+ const char *attr_name = "msDS-User-Account-Control-Computed"; >+ >+ int ret; >+ >+ /* >+ * Re-read the account details, using the GUID in case the DN >+ * is being changed (this is automatic in LDB because the >+ * original search also used DSDB_SEARCH_SHOW_EXTENDED_DN) >+ * >+ * We re read all the attributes in user_attrs, rather than using a >+ * subset to ensure that we can reuse existing validation code. >+ */ >+ ret = dsdb_search_dn(sam_ctx, >+ mem_ctx, >+ &res, >+ user_msg->dn, >+ user_attrs, >+ DSDB_SEARCH_SHOW_EXTENDED_DN); >+ if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { >+ DBG_ERR("Unable to re-read account control data for %s\n", >+ ldb_dn_get_linearized(user_msg->dn)); >+ return NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR; >+ } >+ >+ /* >+ * Ensure the account has not been locked out by another request >+ */ >+ v = ldb_msg_find_ldb_val(res->msgs[0], attr_name); >+ if (v == NULL || v->data == NULL) { >+ DBG_ERR("No %s attribute for %s\n", >+ attr_name, >+ ldb_dn_get_linearized(user_msg->dn)); >+ TALLOC_FREE(res); >+ return NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR; >+ } >+ acct_flags = samdb_result_acct_flags(res->msgs[0], attr_name); >+ if (acct_flags & ACB_AUTOLOCK) { >+ DBG_WARNING( >+ "Account for user %s was locked out.\n", >+ ldb_dn_get_linearized(user_msg->dn)); >+ TALLOC_FREE(res); >+ return NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT; >+ } >+ *current = res->msgs[0]; >+ return NT_STATUS_OK; >+} >+ > static struct db_context *authsam_get_bad_password_db( > TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, > struct ldb_context *sam_ctx) >@@ -1247,6 +1309,26 @@ NTSTATUS authsam_logon_success_accounting(struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, > return status; > } > >+ if (need_db_reread) { >+ struct ldb_message *current = NULL; >+ >+ /* >+ * Re-read the account details, using the GUID >+ * embedded in DN so this is safe against a race where >+ * it is being renamed. >+ */ >+ status = authsam_reread_user_logon_data( >+ sam_ctx, mem_ctx, msg, ¤t); >+ if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { >+ /* >+ * The re-read can return account locked out, as well >+ * as an internal error >+ */ >+ return status; >+ } >+ msg = current; >+ } >+ > lockoutTime = ldb_msg_find_attr_as_int64(msg, "lockoutTime", 0); > dbBadPwdCount = ldb_msg_find_attr_as_int(msg, "badPwdCount", 0); > if (interactive_or_kerberos) { >-- >2.35.0 > > >From 008607472516efce2bf0050a9b43a197aa7070cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz> >Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 11:59:05 +1300 >Subject: [PATCH 07/25] CVE-2021-20251 s4 auth test: Unit tests for > source4/auth/sam.c > >cmocka unit tests for the authsam_reread_user_logon_data in >source4/auth/sam.c > >BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611 > >Signed-off-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz> >--- > selftest/knownfail.d/auth-sam | 25 + > selftest/tests.py | 2 + > source4/auth/tests/sam.c | 2746 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > source4/auth/wscript_build | 11 + > 4 files changed, 2784 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 selftest/knownfail.d/auth-sam > create mode 100644 source4/auth/tests/sam.c > >diff --git a/selftest/knownfail.d/auth-sam b/selftest/knownfail.d/auth-sam >new file mode 100644 >index 00000000000..e87e43d509b >--- /dev/null >+++ b/selftest/knownfail.d/auth-sam >@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ >+^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_reread_account_not_locked.none >+^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_success_accounting_add_control_failed.none >+^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_success_accounting_build_mod_req_failed.none >+^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_success_accounting_commit_failed.none >+^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_success_accounting_ldb_msg_new_failed.none >+^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_success_accounting_ldb_request_failed.none >+^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_success_accounting_ldb_wait_failed.none >+^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_success_accounting_reread_failed.none >+^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_success_accounting_rollback_failed.none >+^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_success_accounting_samdb_rodc_failed.none >+^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_success_accounting_spurious_bad_pwd_indicator.none >+^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_success_accounting_start_txn_failed.none >+^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_success_accounting_update_lastlogon_failed.none >+^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_update_bad_add_control_failed.none >+^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_update_bad_build_mod_request_failed.none >+^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_update_bad_commit_failed.none >+^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_update_bad_get_pso_failed.none >+^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_update_bad_ldb_request_failed.none >+^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_update_bad_ldb_wait_failed.none >+^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_update_bad_no_update_required.none >+^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_update_bad_reread_failed.none >+^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_update_bad_reread_locked_out.none >+^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_update_bad_start_txn_failed.none >+^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_update_bad_txn_cancel_failed.none >+^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_update_bad_update_count_failed.none >diff --git a/selftest/tests.py b/selftest/tests.py >index 82d210d7a46..880f459e973 100644 >--- a/selftest/tests.py >+++ b/selftest/tests.py >@@ -446,6 +446,8 @@ plantestsuite("samba.unittests.test_registry_regfio", "none", > [os.path.join(bindir(), "default/source3/test_registry_regfio")]) > plantestsuite("samba.unittests.test_oLschema2ldif", "none", > [os.path.join(bindir(), "default/source4/utils/oLschema2ldif/test_oLschema2ldif")]) >+plantestsuite("samba.unittests.auth.sam", "none", >+ [os.path.join(bindir(), "test_auth_sam")]) > if with_elasticsearch_backend: > plantestsuite("samba.unittests.mdsparser_es", "none", > [os.path.join(bindir(), "default/source3/test_mdsparser_es")] + [configuration]) >diff --git a/source4/auth/tests/sam.c b/source4/auth/tests/sam.c >new file mode 100644 >index 00000000000..56501f3d4cc >--- /dev/null >+++ b/source4/auth/tests/sam.c >@@ -0,0 +1,2746 @@ >+/* >+ * Unit tests for source4/auth/sam.c >+ * >+ * Copyright (C) Catalyst.NET Ltd 2021 >+ * >+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify >+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by >+ * the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or >+ * (at your option) any later version. >+ * >+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, >+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of >+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the >+ * GNU General Public License for more details. >+ * >+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License >+ * along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. >+ * >+ */ >+ >+/* >+ * from cmocka.c: >+ * These headers or their equivalents should be included prior to >+ * including >+ * this header file. >+ * >+ * #include <stdarg.h> >+ * #include <stddef.h> >+ * #include <setjmp.h> >+ * >+ * This allows test applications to use custom definitions of C standard >+ * library functions and types. >+ * >+ */ >+ >+#include <time.h> >+#include <stdlib.h> >+#include <stdarg.h> >+#include <stddef.h> >+#include <setjmp.h> >+#include <stdint.h> >+#include <cmocka.h> >+ >+#include "includes.h" >+#include "auth/sam.c" >+#include "ldb.h" >+#include "ntstatus.h" >+#include "librpc/gen_ndr/ndr_security.h" >+ >+/***************************************************************************** >+ * wrapped functions >+ * >+ *****************************************************************************/ >+int __wrap_samdb_msg_add_int64( >+ struct ldb_context *sam_ldb, >+ TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, >+ struct ldb_message *msg, >+ const char *attr_name, >+ int64_t v); >+int __real_samdb_msg_add_int64( >+ struct ldb_context *sam_ldb, >+ TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, >+ struct ldb_message *msg, >+ const char *attr_name, >+ int64_t v); >+int __wrap_samdb_msg_add_int64( >+ struct ldb_context *sam_ldb, >+ TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, >+ struct ldb_message *msg, >+ const char *attr_name, >+ int64_t v) >+{ >+ >+ int ret; >+ ret = (int)mock(); >+ if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { >+ return ret; >+ } >+ return __real_samdb_msg_add_int64(sam_ldb, mem_ctx, msg, attr_name, v); >+} >+/***************************************************************************** >+ * Mock implementations >+ *****************************************************************************/ >+ >+static int check_dn(const LargestIntegralType left_value, >+ const LargestIntegralType right_value) >+{ >+ /* >+ *We have to cast away const so we can get the linearized form with >+ * ldb_dn_get_extended_linearized(). >+ */ >+ struct ldb_dn *left_dn = (void *)left_value; >+ struct ldb_dn *right_dn = (void *)right_value; >+ char *left_dn_string = NULL; >+ char *right_dn_string = NULL; >+ bool ok; >+ >+ if (left_dn == NULL && right_dn == NULL) { >+ return true; >+ } >+ >+ if (left_dn != NULL) { >+ left_dn_string = ldb_dn_get_extended_linearized(NULL, left_dn, 1); >+ assert_non_null(left_dn_string); >+ } >+ >+ if (right_dn != NULL) { >+ right_dn_string = ldb_dn_get_extended_linearized(NULL, right_dn, 1); >+ assert_non_null(right_dn_string); >+ } >+ >+ if (left_dn_string == NULL || right_dn_string == NULL) { >+ ok = false; >+ print_error("\"%s\" != \"%s\"\n", >+ left_dn_string != NULL ? left_dn_string : "<NULL>", >+ right_dn_string != NULL ? right_dn_string : "<NULL>"); >+ } else { >+ ok = (strcmp(left_dn_string, right_dn_string) == 0); >+ if (!ok) { >+ print_error("\"%s\" != \"%s\"\n", >+ left_dn_string, >+ right_dn_string); >+ } >+ >+ } >+ >+ TALLOC_FREE(right_dn_string); >+ TALLOC_FREE(left_dn_string); >+ >+ return ok; >+} >+ >+int __wrap_dsdb_search_dn(struct ldb_context *ldb, >+ TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, >+ struct ldb_result **_result, >+ struct ldb_dn *basedn, >+ const char * const *attrs, >+ uint32_t dsdb_flags); >+int __wrap_dsdb_search_dn(struct ldb_context *ldb, >+ TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, >+ struct ldb_result **_result, >+ struct ldb_dn *basedn, >+ const char * const *attrs, >+ uint32_t dsdb_flags) >+{ >+ check_expected(basedn); >+ >+ *_result = talloc_steal(mem_ctx, mock_ptr_type(struct ldb_result *)); >+ >+ return mock(); >+} >+ >+int ldb_transaction_start_ret = LDB_SUCCESS; >+bool in_transaction = false; >+int ldb_transaction_start(struct ldb_context *ldb) { >+ assert_false(in_transaction); >+ if (ldb_transaction_start_ret == LDB_SUCCESS) { >+ in_transaction = true; >+ } >+ return ldb_transaction_start_ret; >+} >+ >+int ldb_transaction_cancel_ret = LDB_SUCCESS; >+bool transaction_cancelled = false; >+int ldb_transaction_cancel(struct ldb_context *ldb) { >+ assert_true(in_transaction); >+ if (ldb_transaction_cancel_ret == LDB_SUCCESS) { >+ in_transaction = false; >+ transaction_cancelled = true; >+ } >+ return ldb_transaction_cancel_ret; >+} >+ >+int ldb_transaction_commit_ret = LDB_SUCCESS; >+bool transaction_committed = false; >+int ldb_transaction_commit(struct ldb_context *ldb) { >+ assert_true(in_transaction); >+ if (ldb_transaction_commit_ret == LDB_SUCCESS) { >+ in_transaction = false; >+ transaction_committed = true; >+ } >+ return ldb_transaction_commit_ret; >+} >+ >+NTSTATUS dsdb_update_bad_pwd_count_ret = NT_STATUS_OK; >+struct ldb_message *dsdb_update_bad_pwd_count_res = NULL; >+NTSTATUS dsdb_update_bad_pwd_count(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, >+ struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, >+ struct ldb_message *user_msg, >+ struct ldb_message *domain_msg, >+ struct ldb_message *pso_msg, >+ struct ldb_message **_mod_msg) { >+ >+ *_mod_msg = talloc_move(mem_ctx, &dsdb_update_bad_pwd_count_res); >+ return dsdb_update_bad_pwd_count_ret; >+} >+ >+int ldb_build_mod_req_ret = LDB_SUCCESS; >+struct ldb_request *ldb_build_mod_req_res = NULL; >+int ldb_build_mod_req(struct ldb_request **ret_req, >+ struct ldb_context *ldb, >+ TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, >+ const struct ldb_message *message, >+ struct ldb_control **controls, >+ void *context, >+ ldb_request_callback_t callback, >+ struct ldb_request *parent) >+{ >+ *ret_req = talloc_move(mem_ctx, &ldb_build_mod_req_res); >+ return ldb_build_mod_req_ret; >+} >+ >+int ldb_request_add_control_ret = LDB_SUCCESS; >+int ldb_request_add_control(struct ldb_request *req, >+ const char *oid, >+ bool critical, >+ void *data) >+{ >+ return ldb_request_add_control_ret; >+} >+ >+int ldb_request_ret = LDB_SUCCESS; >+int ldb_request(struct ldb_context *ldb, >+ struct ldb_request *req) >+{ >+ return ldb_request_ret; >+} >+ >+int ldb_wait_ret = LDB_SUCCESS; >+int ldb_wait(struct ldb_handle *handle, >+ enum ldb_wait_type type) >+{ >+ return ldb_wait_ret; >+} >+bool ldb_msg_new_fail = false; >+struct ldb_message *ldb_msg_new(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx) >+{ >+ if (ldb_msg_new_fail) { >+ return NULL; >+ } else { >+ return talloc_zero(mem_ctx, struct ldb_message); >+ } >+} >+ >+int samdb_rodc_ret = LDB_SUCCESS; >+bool samdb_rodc_res = false; >+ >+int samdb_rodc( >+ struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, >+ bool *am_rodc) >+{ >+ >+ *am_rodc = samdb_rodc_res; >+ return samdb_rodc_ret; >+} >+ >+struct loadparm_context *ldb_get_opaque_ret = NULL; >+void *ldb_get_opaque(struct ldb_context *ldb, const char *name) >+{ >+ return ldb_get_opaque_ret; >+} >+ >+struct db_context {}; >+struct db_context *cluster_db_tmp_open_ret = NULL; >+struct db_context *cluster_db_tmp_open( >+ TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, >+ struct loadparm_context *lp_ctx, >+ const char *dbbase, >+ int flags) >+{ >+ return cluster_db_tmp_open_ret; >+} >+ >+NTSTATUS dbwrap_store_ret = NT_STATUS_OK; >+NTSTATUS dbwrap_store(struct db_context *db, TDB_DATA key, >+ TDB_DATA data, int flags) >+{ >+ return dbwrap_store_ret; >+} >+bool dbwrap_exists_ret = true; >+ >+bool dbwrap_exists(struct db_context *db, TDB_DATA key) >+{ >+ return dbwrap_exists_ret; >+} >+ >+NTSTATUS dbwrap_delete_ret = NT_STATUS_OK; >+NTSTATUS dbwrap_delete(struct db_context *db, TDB_DATA key) >+{ >+ return dbwrap_delete_ret; >+} >+ >+/* >+ * Set the globals used by the mocked functions to a known and consistent state >+ * >+ */ >+static void init_mock_results(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx) >+{ >+ ldb_transaction_start_ret = LDB_SUCCESS; >+ in_transaction = false; >+ >+ ldb_transaction_cancel_ret = LDB_SUCCESS; >+ transaction_cancelled = false; >+ >+ ldb_transaction_commit_ret = LDB_SUCCESS; >+ transaction_committed = false; >+ >+ dsdb_update_bad_pwd_count_ret = NT_STATUS_OK; >+ dsdb_update_bad_pwd_count_res = NULL; >+ >+ ldb_build_mod_req_ret = LDB_SUCCESS; >+ ldb_build_mod_req_res = NULL; >+ >+ ldb_request_add_control_ret = LDB_SUCCESS; >+ ldb_request_ret = LDB_SUCCESS; >+ ldb_wait_ret = LDB_SUCCESS; >+ >+ ldb_msg_new_fail = false; >+ >+ samdb_rodc_ret = LDB_SUCCESS; >+ samdb_rodc_res = false; >+ >+ ldb_get_opaque_ret = loadparm_init(mem_ctx); >+ >+ cluster_db_tmp_open_ret = talloc_zero(mem_ctx, struct db_context); >+ >+ dbwrap_store_ret = NT_STATUS_OK; >+ >+ dbwrap_exists_ret = true; >+ >+ dbwrap_delete_ret = NT_STATUS_OK; >+ >+} >+ >+/***************************************************************************** >+ * Unit test set up and tear down >+ *****************************************************************************/ >+struct context { >+}; >+ >+static int setup(void **state) { >+ struct context *ctx = talloc_zero(NULL, struct context); >+ init_mock_results(ctx); >+ >+ *state = ctx; >+ return 0; >+} >+ >+static int teardown(void **state) { >+ struct context *ctx = *state; >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+ return 0; >+} >+ >+/****************************************************************************** >+ * Helper functions >+ ******************************************************************************/ >+ >+/* >+ * Build the "Original" user details record, i.e. the user being >+ * authenticated >+ */ >+static struct ldb_message* create_message(TALLOC_CTX *ctx) >+{ >+ >+ int ret; >+ struct timeval tv_now = timeval_current(); >+ NTTIME now = timeval_to_nttime(&tv_now); >+ >+ struct ldb_message* msg = ldb_msg_new(ctx); >+ >+ assert_non_null(msg); >+ ret = samdb_msg_add_int(ctx, msg, msg, "badPwdCount", 10); >+ assert_int_equal(LDB_SUCCESS, ret); >+ ret = __real_samdb_msg_add_int64(ctx, msg, msg, "badPasswordTime", now); >+ assert_int_equal(LDB_SUCCESS, ret); >+ ret = __real_samdb_msg_add_int64(ctx, msg, msg, "lockoutTime", now); >+ assert_int_equal(LDB_SUCCESS, ret); >+ return msg; >+} >+ >+/* >+ * Add an objectSID in string form to the supplied message >+ * >+ * >+ */ >+static void add_sid( >+ struct ldb_message *msg, >+ const char *sid_str) >+{ >+ struct ldb_val v; >+ enum ndr_err_code ndr_err; >+ struct dom_sid *sid = NULL; >+ >+ sid = talloc_zero(msg, struct dom_sid); >+ assert_non_null(sid); >+ assert_true(string_to_sid(sid, sid_str)); >+ ndr_err = ndr_push_struct_blob( >+ &v, msg, sid, (ndr_push_flags_fn_t)ndr_push_dom_sid); >+ assert_true(NDR_ERR_CODE_IS_SUCCESS(ndr_err)); >+ assert_int_equal(0, ldb_msg_add_value(msg, "objectSID", &v, NULL)); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * Build an ldb_result, for the re-reading of a user record >+ * >+ * if account_control < 0 then the msDS-User-Account-Control-Computed >+ * element is not included >+ * otherwise it is set to the value passed in account_control. >+ * >+ */ >+static struct ldb_result *build_reread_result( >+ struct ldb_context *ldb, >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx, >+ int account_control) >+{ >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ int ret; >+ >+ struct ldb_result *res = talloc_zero(ctx, struct ldb_result); >+ >+ assert_non_null(res); >+ res->count = 1; >+ res->msgs = talloc_array(res, struct ldb_message *, 1); >+ >+ msg = create_message(res); >+ add_sid(msg, "S-1-5-21-2470180966-3899876309-2637894779-1000"); >+ if (account_control >= 0) { >+ ret = samdb_msg_add_int( >+ ldb, >+ msg, >+ msg, >+ "msDS-User-Account-Control-Computed", >+ account_control); >+ assert_int_equal(LDB_SUCCESS, ret); >+ } >+ >+ res->msgs[0] = msg; >+ return res; >+} >+ >+/* >+ * Build a mock domain pso ldb_result >+ */ >+static struct ldb_result *build_domain_pso_result( >+ struct ldb_context *ldb, >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx) >+{ >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ struct ldb_result *res = talloc_zero(ctx, struct ldb_result); >+ >+ assert_non_null(res); >+ res->count = 1; >+ res->msgs = talloc_array(res, struct ldb_message *, 1); >+ assert_non_null(res->msgs); >+ msg = talloc_zero(res, struct ldb_message); >+ assert_non_null(msg); >+ res->msgs[0] = msg; >+ return res; >+} >+ >+/***************************************************************************** >+ * authsam_reread_user_logon_data unit tests >+ *****************************************************************************/ >+/* >+ * authsam_reread_user_logon_data unable to re-read the user record. >+ * >+ */ >+static void test_reread_read_failure(void **state) { >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *cur = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ msg = create_message(ctx); >+ add_sid(msg, "S-1-5-21-2470180966-3899876309-2637894779-1000"); >+ >+ msg->dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=User"); >+ assert_non_null(msg->dn); >+ >+ before = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, msg->dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, NULL); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_ERR_NO_SUCH_OBJECT); >+ >+ status = authsam_reread_user_logon_data(ldb, ctx, msg, &cur); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR)); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * authsam_reread_user_logon_data account control flags missing from >+ * re-read data >+ * >+ */ >+static void test_reread_missing_account_control(void **state) { >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *cur = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ msg = create_message(ctx); >+ add_sid(msg, "S-1-5-21-2470180966-3899876309-2637894779-1000"); >+ >+ msg->dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=User"); >+ assert_non_null(msg->dn); >+ >+ before = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, msg->dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, build_reread_result(ldb, ctx, -1)); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ status = authsam_reread_user_logon_data(ldb, ctx, msg, &cur); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR)); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * authsam_reread_user_logon_data account locked >+ * re-read data >+ * >+ */ >+static void test_reread_account_locked(void **state) { >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *cur = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ msg = create_message(ctx); >+ add_sid(msg, "S-1-5-21-2470180966-3899876309-2637894779-1000"); >+ >+ msg->dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=User"); >+ assert_non_null(msg->dn); >+ >+ before = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, msg->dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, build_reread_result(ldb, ctx, UF_LOCKOUT)); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ status = authsam_reread_user_logon_data(ldb, ctx, msg, &cur); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT)); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * authsam_reread_user_logon_data account is not locked >+ * re-read data >+ * >+ */ >+static void test_reread_account_not_locked(void **state) { >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *cur = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ size_t result_size = 0; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ struct ldb_result *res = NULL; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ msg = create_message(ctx); >+ add_sid(msg, "S-1-5-21-2470180966-3899876309-2637894779-1000"); >+ >+ msg->dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=User"); >+ assert_non_null(msg->dn); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, msg->dn); >+ /* >+ * authsam_reread_user_logon_data returns the ldb_message portion >+ * of the ldb_result created by build_reread_result. >+ * So the tests for memory leaks will need to adjust for that >+ */ >+ res = build_reread_result(ldb, ctx, 0); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, res); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ result_size = talloc_total_size(res) - >+ talloc_total_size(res->msgs[0]); >+ before = talloc_total_size(ctx) - result_size; >+ >+ status = authsam_reread_user_logon_data(ldb, ctx, msg, &cur); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+ >+/***************************************************************************** >+ * authsam_update_bad_pwd_count unit tests >+ *****************************************************************************/ >+ >+/* >+ * authsam_update_bad_pwd_account >+ * >+ * Unable to read the domain_dn record >+ * >+ */ >+static void test_update_bad_domain_dn_search_failed(void **state) { >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ struct ldb_dn *domain_dn = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ domain_dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=Domain"); >+ assert_non_null(domain_dn); >+ >+ msg = talloc_zero(ctx, struct ldb_message); >+ assert_non_null(msg); >+ >+ msg->dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=User"); >+ assert_non_null(msg->dn); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, domain_dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, NULL); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_ERR_NO_SUCH_OBJECT); >+ >+ before = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ >+ status = authsam_update_bad_pwd_count(ldb, msg, domain_dn); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_DB_CORRUPTION)); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * authsam_update_bad_pwd_account >+ * >+ * authsam_get_user_pso failure >+ * >+ */ >+static void test_update_bad_get_pso_failed(void **state) { >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ struct ldb_dn *domain_dn = NULL; >+ struct ldb_dn *pso_dn = NULL; >+ const char *pso_dn_str = "CN=PSO"; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ int ret; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ domain_dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=Domain"); >+ assert_non_null(domain_dn); >+ >+ pso_dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, pso_dn_str); >+ assert_non_null(pso_dn); >+ >+ msg = talloc_zero(ctx, struct ldb_message); >+ assert_non_null(msg); >+ ret = ldb_msg_add_string(msg, "msDS-ResultantPSO", pso_dn_str); >+ assert_int_equal(LDB_SUCCESS, ret); >+ >+ msg->dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=User"); >+ assert_non_null(msg->dn); >+ >+ before = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, domain_dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, build_domain_pso_result(ldb, ctx)); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, pso_dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, NULL); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_ERR_NO_SUCH_OBJECT); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, msg->dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, build_reread_result(ldb, ctx, 0)); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ status = authsam_update_bad_pwd_count(ldb, msg, domain_dn); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+ >+/* >+ * authsam_update_bad_pwd_account >+ * >+ * start_transaction failure >+ * >+ */ >+static void test_update_bad_start_txn_failed(void **state) { >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ struct ldb_dn *domain_dn = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ domain_dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=Domain"); >+ assert_non_null(domain_dn); >+ >+ msg = talloc_zero(ctx, struct ldb_message); >+ assert_non_null(msg); >+ >+ before = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, domain_dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, build_domain_pso_result(ldb, ctx)); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ ldb_transaction_start_ret = LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR; >+ >+ status = authsam_update_bad_pwd_count(ldb, msg, domain_dn); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR)); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * authsam_update_bad_pwd_account >+ * >+ * User details re-read failed >+ * >+ */ >+static void test_update_bad_reread_failed(void **state) { >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ struct ldb_dn *domain_dn = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ domain_dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=Domain"); >+ assert_non_null(domain_dn); >+ >+ msg = talloc_zero(ctx, struct ldb_message); >+ assert_non_null(msg); >+ >+ msg->dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=User"); >+ assert_non_null(msg->dn); >+ >+ before = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, domain_dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, build_domain_pso_result(ldb, ctx)); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, msg->dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, NULL); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_ERR_NO_SUCH_OBJECT); >+ >+ status = authsam_update_bad_pwd_count(ldb, msg, domain_dn); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR)); >+ assert_true(transaction_cancelled); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * authsam_update_bad_pwd_account >+ * >+ * User details re-read reported locked out. >+ * >+ */ >+static void test_update_bad_reread_locked_out(void **state) { >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ struct ldb_dn *domain_dn = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ domain_dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=Domain"); >+ assert_non_null(domain_dn); >+ >+ msg = create_message(ctx); >+ add_sid(msg, "S-1-5-21-2470180966-3899876309-2637894779-1000"); >+ >+ msg->dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=User"); >+ assert_non_null(msg->dn); >+ >+ before = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, domain_dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, build_domain_pso_result(ldb, ctx)); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, msg->dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, build_reread_result(ldb, ctx, UF_LOCKOUT)); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ status = authsam_update_bad_pwd_count(ldb, msg, domain_dn); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT)); >+ assert_false(transaction_cancelled); >+ assert_true(transaction_committed); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * authsam_update_bad_pwd_account >+ * >+ * Transaction cancel failure >+ */ >+static void test_update_bad_txn_cancel_failed(void **state) { >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ struct ldb_dn *domain_dn = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ domain_dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=Domain"); >+ assert_non_null(domain_dn); >+ >+ msg = talloc_zero(ctx, struct ldb_message); >+ assert_non_null(msg); >+ >+ msg->dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=User"); >+ assert_non_null(msg->dn); >+ >+ before = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, domain_dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, build_domain_pso_result(ldb, ctx)); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, msg->dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, NULL); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_ERR_NO_SUCH_OBJECT); >+ >+ ldb_transaction_cancel_ret = LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR; >+ >+ status = authsam_update_bad_pwd_count(ldb, msg, domain_dn); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR)); >+ assert_true(in_transaction); >+ assert_false(transaction_cancelled); >+ assert_false(transaction_committed); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * The following tests all expect the same setup, that is a normal >+ * good user object and empty domain object. >+ * >+ * returns the talloc size after result array setup for leak tests >+ */ >+static size_t setup_bad_password_search_results(TALLOC_CTX *ctx, >+ struct ldb_context *ldb, >+ struct ldb_dn *domain_dn, >+ struct ldb_dn *user_dn) >+{ >+ size_t before = 0; >+ >+ before = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, domain_dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, build_domain_pso_result(ldb, ctx)); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, user_dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, build_reread_result(ldb, ctx, 0)); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ return before; >+} >+ >+ >+/* >+ * authsam_update_bad_pwd_account >+ * >+ * dsdb_update_bad_pwd_count failure >+ * >+ */ >+static void test_update_bad_update_count_failed(void **state) { >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ struct ldb_dn *domain_dn = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ domain_dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=Domain"); >+ assert_non_null(domain_dn); >+ >+ msg = create_message(ctx); >+ add_sid(msg, "S-1-5-21-2470180966-3899876309-2637894779-1000"); >+ >+ msg->dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=User"); >+ assert_non_null(msg->dn); >+ >+ before = setup_bad_password_search_results(ctx, ldb, >+ domain_dn, >+ msg->dn); >+ >+ dsdb_update_bad_pwd_count_ret = NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR; >+ >+ status = authsam_update_bad_pwd_count(ldb, msg, domain_dn); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR)); >+ assert_true(transaction_cancelled); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * authsam_update_bad_pwd_account >+ * >+ * No need to update the bad password stats >+ * >+ */ >+static void test_update_bad_no_update_required(void **state) { >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ struct ldb_dn *domain_dn = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ domain_dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=Domain"); >+ assert_non_null(domain_dn); >+ >+ msg = create_message(ctx); >+ add_sid(msg, "S-1-5-21-2470180966-3899876309-2637894779-1000"); >+ >+ msg->dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=User"); >+ assert_non_null(msg->dn); >+ >+ before = setup_bad_password_search_results(ctx, ldb, >+ domain_dn, >+ msg->dn); >+ >+ status = authsam_update_bad_pwd_count(ldb, msg, domain_dn); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)); >+ assert_true(transaction_committed); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * authsam_update_bad_pwd_account >+ * >+ * Transaction commit failure >+ * >+ */ >+static void test_update_bad_commit_failed(void **state) { >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ struct ldb_dn *domain_dn = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ domain_dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=Domain"); >+ assert_non_null(domain_dn); >+ >+ msg = create_message(ctx); >+ add_sid(msg, "S-1-5-21-2470180966-3899876309-2637894779-1000"); >+ >+ msg->dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=User"); >+ assert_non_null(msg->dn); >+ >+ before = setup_bad_password_search_results(ctx, ldb, >+ domain_dn, >+ msg->dn); >+ >+ ldb_transaction_commit_ret = LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR; >+ >+ status = authsam_update_bad_pwd_count(ldb, msg, domain_dn); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR)); >+ assert_true(in_transaction); >+ assert_false(transaction_cancelled); >+ assert_false(transaction_committed); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * authsam_update_bad_pwd_account >+ * >+ * ldb_build_mod_req failed building the user update details >+ * >+ */ >+static void test_update_bad_build_mod_request_failed(void **state) { >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ struct ldb_dn *domain_dn = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ domain_dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=Domain"); >+ assert_non_null(domain_dn); >+ >+ msg = create_message(ctx); >+ add_sid(msg, "S-1-5-21-2470180966-3899876309-2637894779-1000"); >+ >+ msg->dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=User"); >+ assert_non_null(msg->dn); >+ >+ before = setup_bad_password_search_results(ctx, ldb, >+ domain_dn, >+ msg->dn); >+ >+ dsdb_update_bad_pwd_count_res = talloc_zero(ctx, struct ldb_message); >+ ldb_build_mod_req_ret = LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR; >+ >+ status = authsam_update_bad_pwd_count(ldb, msg, domain_dn); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR)); >+ assert_true(transaction_cancelled); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * authsam_update_bad_pwd_account >+ * >+ * ldb_request_add_control failed to add DSDB_CONTROL_FORCE_RODC_LOCAL_CHANGE >+ * to the user update record. >+ * >+ */ >+static void test_update_bad_add_control_failed(void **state) { >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ struct ldb_dn *domain_dn = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ domain_dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=Domain"); >+ assert_non_null(domain_dn); >+ >+ msg = create_message(ctx); >+ add_sid(msg, "S-1-5-21-2470180966-3899876309-2637894779-1000"); >+ >+ msg->dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=User"); >+ assert_non_null(msg->dn); >+ >+ before = setup_bad_password_search_results(ctx, ldb, >+ domain_dn, >+ msg->dn); >+ >+ dsdb_update_bad_pwd_count_res = talloc_zero(ctx, struct ldb_message); >+ ldb_build_mod_req_res = talloc_zero(ctx, struct ldb_request); >+ ldb_request_add_control_ret = LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR; >+ >+ status = authsam_update_bad_pwd_count(ldb, msg, domain_dn); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR)); >+ assert_true(transaction_cancelled); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * authsam_update_bad_pwd_account >+ * >+ * call to ldb_request failed >+ * >+ */ >+static void test_update_bad_ldb_request_failed(void **state) { >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ struct ldb_dn *domain_dn = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ domain_dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=Domain"); >+ assert_non_null(domain_dn); >+ >+ msg = create_message(ctx); >+ add_sid(msg, "S-1-5-21-2470180966-3899876309-2637894779-1000"); >+ >+ msg->dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=User"); >+ assert_non_null(msg->dn); >+ >+ before = setup_bad_password_search_results(ctx, ldb, >+ domain_dn, >+ msg->dn); >+ >+ dsdb_update_bad_pwd_count_res = talloc_zero(ctx, struct ldb_message); >+ ldb_build_mod_req_res = talloc_zero(ctx, struct ldb_request); >+ ldb_request_ret = LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR; >+ >+ status = authsam_update_bad_pwd_count(ldb, msg, domain_dn); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR)); >+ assert_true(transaction_cancelled); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * authsam_update_bad_pwd_account >+ * >+ * call to ldb_wait failed >+ * >+ */ >+static void test_update_bad_ldb_wait_failed(void **state) { >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ struct ldb_dn *domain_dn = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ domain_dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=Domain"); >+ assert_non_null(domain_dn); >+ >+ msg = create_message(ctx); >+ add_sid(msg, "S-1-5-21-2470180966-3899876309-2637894779-1000"); >+ >+ msg->dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=User"); >+ assert_non_null(msg->dn); >+ >+ before = setup_bad_password_search_results(ctx, ldb, >+ domain_dn, >+ msg->dn); >+ >+ dsdb_update_bad_pwd_count_res = talloc_zero(ctx, struct ldb_message); >+ ldb_build_mod_req_res = talloc_zero(ctx, struct ldb_request); >+ ldb_wait_ret = LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR; >+ >+ status = authsam_update_bad_pwd_count(ldb, msg, domain_dn); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR)); >+ assert_true(transaction_cancelled); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/***************************************************************************** >+ * authsam_logon_success_accounting unit tests >+ *****************************************************************************/ >+/* >+ * authsam_logon_success_accounting >+ * >+ * start_transaction failure >+ * >+ */ >+static void test_success_accounting_start_txn_failed(void **state) { >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ struct ldb_dn *domain_dn = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ domain_dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=Domain"); >+ assert_non_null(domain_dn); >+ >+ msg = create_message(ctx); >+ add_sid(msg, "S-1-5-21-2470180966-3899876309-2637894779-1000"); >+ >+ msg->dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=User"); >+ assert_non_null(msg->dn); >+ >+ before = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, domain_dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, build_domain_pso_result(ldb, ctx)); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ ldb_transaction_start_ret = LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR; >+ >+ status = authsam_logon_success_accounting( >+ ldb, msg, domain_dn, true, NULL); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR)); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * authsam_logon_success_accounting >+ * >+ * User details re-read failed >+ * >+ */ >+static void test_success_accounting_reread_failed(void **state) { >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ struct ldb_dn *domain_dn = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ domain_dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=Domain"); >+ assert_non_null(domain_dn); >+ >+ msg = create_message(ctx); >+ add_sid(msg, "S-1-5-21-2470180966-3899876309-2637894779-1000"); >+ >+ msg->dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=User"); >+ assert_non_null(msg->dn); >+ >+ before = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, domain_dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, build_domain_pso_result(ldb, ctx)); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, msg->dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, NULL); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_ERR_NO_SUCH_OBJECT); >+ >+ status = authsam_logon_success_accounting( >+ ldb, msg, domain_dn, true, NULL); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR)); >+ assert_true(transaction_cancelled); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * authsam_logon_success_accounting >+ * >+ * ldb_msg_new failed >+ * >+ */ >+static void test_success_accounting_ldb_msg_new_failed(void **state) { >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ struct ldb_dn *domain_dn = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ domain_dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=Domain"); >+ assert_non_null(domain_dn); >+ >+ msg = create_message(ctx); >+ add_sid(msg, "S-1-5-21-2470180966-3899876309-2637894779-1000"); >+ >+ msg->dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=User"); >+ assert_non_null(msg->dn); >+ >+ before = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, domain_dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, build_domain_pso_result(ldb, ctx)); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, msg->dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, build_reread_result(ldb, ctx, 0)); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ ldb_msg_new_fail = true; >+ >+ status = authsam_logon_success_accounting( >+ ldb, msg, domain_dn, true, NULL); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY)); >+ assert_true(transaction_cancelled); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * authsam_logon_success_accounting >+ * >+ * samdb_rodc failed >+ * >+ */ >+static void test_success_accounting_samdb_rodc_failed(void **state) { >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ struct ldb_dn *domain_dn = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ domain_dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=Domain"); >+ assert_non_null(domain_dn); >+ >+ msg = create_message(ctx); >+ add_sid(msg, "S-1-5-21-2470180966-3899876309-2637894779-1000"); >+ >+ msg->dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=User"); >+ assert_non_null(msg->dn); >+ >+ before = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ >+ samdb_rodc_ret = LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR; >+ >+ status = authsam_logon_success_accounting( >+ ldb, msg, domain_dn, true, NULL); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR)); >+ assert_false(in_transaction); >+ assert_false(transaction_cancelled); >+ assert_false(transaction_committed); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * authsam_logon_success_accounting >+ * >+ * authsam_update_lastlogon_timestamp failed >+ * >+ */ >+static void test_success_accounting_update_lastlogon_failed(void **state) { >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ struct ldb_dn *domain_dn = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ domain_dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=Domain"); >+ assert_non_null(domain_dn); >+ >+ msg = create_message(ctx); >+ add_sid(msg, "S-1-5-21-2470180966-3899876309-2637894779-1000"); >+ >+ msg->dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=User"); >+ assert_non_null(msg->dn); >+ >+ ldb_build_mod_req_res = talloc_zero(ctx, struct ldb_request); >+ >+ before = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, domain_dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, build_domain_pso_result(ldb, ctx)); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, msg->dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, build_reread_result(ldb, ctx, 0)); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ will_return(__wrap_samdb_msg_add_int64, LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR); >+ >+ status = authsam_logon_success_accounting( >+ ldb, msg, domain_dn, true, NULL); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY)); >+ assert_true(transaction_cancelled); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * authsam_logon_success_accounting >+ * >+ * ldb_build_mod_req failed >+ * >+ */ >+static void test_success_accounting_build_mod_req_failed(void **state) { >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ struct ldb_dn *domain_dn = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ domain_dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=Domain"); >+ assert_non_null(domain_dn); >+ >+ msg = create_message(ctx); >+ add_sid(msg, "S-1-5-21-2470180966-3899876309-2637894779-1000"); >+ >+ msg->dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=User"); >+ assert_non_null(msg->dn); >+ >+ before = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, domain_dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, build_domain_pso_result(ldb, ctx)); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, msg->dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, build_reread_result(ldb, ctx, 0)); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ ldb_build_mod_req_ret = LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR; >+ >+ will_return(__wrap_samdb_msg_add_int64, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ will_return(__wrap_samdb_msg_add_int64, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ status = authsam_logon_success_accounting( >+ ldb, msg, domain_dn, true, NULL); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR)); >+ assert_true(transaction_cancelled); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * authsam_logon_success_accounting >+ * >+ * ldb_request_add_control failed >+ * >+ */ >+static void test_success_accounting_add_control_failed(void **state) { >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ struct ldb_dn *domain_dn = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ domain_dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=Domain"); >+ assert_non_null(domain_dn); >+ >+ msg = create_message(ctx); >+ add_sid(msg, "S-1-5-21-2470180966-3899876309-2637894779-1000"); >+ >+ msg->dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=User"); >+ assert_non_null(msg->dn); >+ >+ before = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, domain_dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, build_domain_pso_result(ldb, ctx)); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, msg->dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, build_reread_result(ldb, ctx, 0)); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ ldb_build_mod_req_res = talloc_zero(ldb, struct ldb_request); >+ ldb_request_add_control_ret = LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR; >+ >+ will_return(__wrap_samdb_msg_add_int64, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ will_return(__wrap_samdb_msg_add_int64, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ status = authsam_logon_success_accounting( >+ ldb, msg, domain_dn, true, NULL); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR)); >+ assert_true(transaction_cancelled); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * authsam_logon_success_accounting >+ * >+ * ldb_request failed >+ * >+ */ >+static void test_success_accounting_ldb_request_failed(void **state) { >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ struct ldb_dn *domain_dn = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ domain_dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=Domain"); >+ assert_non_null(domain_dn); >+ >+ msg = create_message(ctx); >+ add_sid(msg, "S-1-5-21-2470180966-3899876309-2637894779-1000"); >+ >+ msg->dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=User"); >+ assert_non_null(msg->dn); >+ >+ before = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, domain_dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, build_domain_pso_result(ldb, ctx)); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, msg->dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, build_reread_result(ldb, ctx, 0)); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ ldb_build_mod_req_res = talloc_zero(ldb, struct ldb_request); >+ ldb_request_ret = LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR; >+ >+ will_return(__wrap_samdb_msg_add_int64, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ will_return(__wrap_samdb_msg_add_int64, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ status = authsam_logon_success_accounting( >+ ldb, msg, domain_dn, true, NULL); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR)); >+ assert_true(transaction_cancelled); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * authsam_logon_success_accounting >+ * >+ * ldb_wait failed >+ * >+ */ >+static void test_success_accounting_ldb_wait_failed(void **state) { >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ struct ldb_dn *domain_dn = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ domain_dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=Domain"); >+ assert_non_null(domain_dn); >+ >+ msg = create_message(ctx); >+ add_sid(msg, "S-1-5-21-2470180966-3899876309-2637894779-1000"); >+ >+ msg->dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=User"); >+ assert_non_null(msg->dn); >+ >+ before = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, domain_dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, build_domain_pso_result(ldb, ctx)); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, msg->dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, build_reread_result(ldb, ctx, 0)); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ ldb_build_mod_req_res = talloc_zero(ldb, struct ldb_request); >+ ldb_wait_ret = LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR; >+ >+ will_return(__wrap_samdb_msg_add_int64, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ will_return(__wrap_samdb_msg_add_int64, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ status = authsam_logon_success_accounting( >+ ldb, msg, domain_dn, true, NULL); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR)); >+ assert_true(transaction_cancelled); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * authsam_logon_success_accounting >+ * >+ * ldb_transaction_commit failed >+ * >+ */ >+static void test_success_accounting_commit_failed(void **state) { >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ struct ldb_dn *domain_dn = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ domain_dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=Domain"); >+ assert_non_null(domain_dn); >+ >+ msg = create_message(ctx); >+ add_sid(msg, "S-1-5-21-2470180966-3899876309-2637894779-1000"); >+ >+ msg->dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=User"); >+ assert_non_null(msg->dn); >+ >+ before = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, domain_dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, build_domain_pso_result(ldb, ctx)); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, msg->dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, build_reread_result(ldb, ctx, 0)); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ ldb_build_mod_req_res = talloc_zero(ldb, struct ldb_request); >+ ldb_transaction_commit_ret = LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR; >+ >+ will_return(__wrap_samdb_msg_add_int64, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ will_return(__wrap_samdb_msg_add_int64, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ status = authsam_logon_success_accounting( >+ ldb, msg, domain_dn, true, NULL); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR)); >+ assert_true(in_transaction); >+ assert_false(transaction_cancelled); >+ assert_false(transaction_committed); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * authsam_logon_success_accounting >+ * >+ * ldb_wait failed and then ldb_transaction_cancel failed >+ * >+ */ >+static void test_success_accounting_rollback_failed(void **state) { >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ struct ldb_dn *domain_dn = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ domain_dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=Domain"); >+ assert_non_null(domain_dn); >+ >+ msg = create_message(ctx); >+ add_sid(msg, "S-1-5-21-2470180966-3899876309-2637894779-1000"); >+ >+ msg->dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=User"); >+ assert_non_null(msg->dn); >+ >+ before = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, domain_dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, build_domain_pso_result(ldb, ctx)); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, msg->dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, build_reread_result(ldb, ctx, 0)); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ ldb_build_mod_req_res = talloc_zero(ldb, struct ldb_request); >+ ldb_wait_ret = LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR; >+ ldb_transaction_cancel_ret = LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR; >+ >+ will_return(__wrap_samdb_msg_add_int64, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ will_return(__wrap_samdb_msg_add_int64, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ status = authsam_logon_success_accounting( >+ ldb, msg, domain_dn, true, NULL); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR)); >+ assert_true(in_transaction); >+ assert_false(transaction_cancelled); >+ assert_false(transaction_committed); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * authsam_logon_success_accounting >+ * >+ * The bad password indicator is set, but the account is not locked out. >+ * >+ */ >+static void test_success_accounting_spurious_bad_pwd_indicator(void **state) { >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ struct ldb_dn *domain_dn = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ domain_dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=Domain"); >+ assert_non_null(domain_dn); >+ >+ msg = create_message(ctx); >+ add_sid(msg, "S-1-5-21-2470180966-3899876309-2637894779-1000"); >+ >+ msg->dn = ldb_dn_new(ctx, ldb, "CN=User"); >+ assert_non_null(msg->dn); >+ >+ before = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, domain_dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, build_domain_pso_result(ldb, ctx)); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ expect_check(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, basedn, check_dn, msg->dn); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, build_reread_result(ldb, ctx, 0)); >+ will_return(__wrap_dsdb_search_dn, LDB_SUCCESS); >+ >+ will_return_count(__wrap_samdb_msg_add_int64, LDB_SUCCESS, 2); >+ >+ /* >+ * Set the bad password indicator. >+ */ >+ status = authsam_set_bad_password_indicator(ldb, ctx, msg); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(NT_STATUS_OK, status)); >+ >+ ldb_build_mod_req_res = talloc_zero(ctx, struct ldb_request); >+ >+ status = authsam_logon_success_accounting( >+ ldb, msg, domain_dn, true, NULL); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_OK)); >+ assert_false(in_transaction); >+ assert_false(transaction_cancelled); >+ assert_true(transaction_committed); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * get_bad_password_db >+ * >+ * ldb_get_opaque failure. >+ */ >+static void test_get_bad_password_get_opaque_failed(void **state) { >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ struct db_context *db = NULL; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ /* >+ * clear the mock ldb_get_opaque return value, so that we get a null >+ * response. >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ldb_get_opaque_ret); >+ >+ before = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ >+ db = authsam_get_bad_password_db(ctx, ldb); >+ assert_null(db); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * get_bad_password_db >+ * >+ * cluster_db_tmp_open failure. >+ */ >+static void test_get_bad_password_db_open_failed(void **state) { >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ struct db_context *db = NULL; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clear the mock cluster_db_tmp_open return value so that >+ * it returns NULL >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(cluster_db_tmp_open_ret); >+ before = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ >+ db = authsam_get_bad_password_db(ctx, ldb); >+ assert_null(db); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * set_bad_password_indicator >+ * >+ * set_bad_password_indicator failure. >+ */ >+static void test_set_bad_password_indicator_get_db_failed(void **state) { >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clear the mock cluster_db_tmp_open return value so that >+ * it returns NULL >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(cluster_db_tmp_open_ret); >+ before = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ >+ status = authsam_set_bad_password_indicator(ldb, ctx, NULL); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR, status)); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * set_bad_password_indicator >+ * >+ * get_object_sid_as_tdb_data failure. >+ */ >+static void test_set_bad_password_indicator_get_object_sid_failed( >+ void **state) >+{ >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ /* >+ * The created message does not contain an objectSid, so >+ * get_object_sid_as_tdb_data will fail. >+ */ >+ msg = create_message(ctx); >+ >+ before = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ >+ status = authsam_set_bad_password_indicator(ldb, ctx, msg); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR, status)); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * set_bad_password_indicator >+ * >+ * dbwrap_store failure. >+ */ >+static void test_set_bad_password_indicator_dbwrap_store_failed( >+ void **state) >+{ >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ msg = create_message(ctx); >+ add_sid(msg, "S-1-5-21-2470180966-3899876309-2637894779-1010"); >+ >+ dbwrap_store_ret = NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_DB_CORRUPTION; >+ >+ before = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ >+ status = authsam_set_bad_password_indicator(ldb, ctx, msg); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_DB_CORRUPTION, status)); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * check_bad_password_indicator >+ * >+ * set_bad_password_indicator failure. >+ */ >+static void test_check_bad_password_indicator_get_db_failed(void **state) { >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ bool exists = false; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clear the mock cluster_db_tmp_open return value so that >+ * it returns NULL >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(cluster_db_tmp_open_ret); >+ before = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ >+ status = authsam_check_bad_password_indicator(ldb, ctx, &exists, NULL); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR, status)); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * check_bad_password_indicator >+ * >+ * get_object_sid_as_tdb_data failure. >+ */ >+static void test_check_bad_password_indicator_get_object_sid_failed( >+ void **state) >+{ >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ bool exists = false; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ /* >+ * The created message does not contain an objectSid, so >+ * get_object_sid_as_tdb_data will fail. >+ */ >+ msg = create_message(ctx); >+ >+ before = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ >+ status = authsam_check_bad_password_indicator(ldb, ctx, &exists, msg); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR, status)); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * clear_bad_password_indicator >+ * >+ * set_bad_password_indicator failure. >+ */ >+static void test_clear_bad_password_indicator_get_db_failed(void **state) { >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clear the mock cluster_db_tmp_open return value so that >+ * it returns NULL >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(cluster_db_tmp_open_ret); >+ before = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ >+ status = authsam_clear_bad_password_indicator(ldb, ctx, NULL); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR, status)); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * clear_bad_password_indicator >+ * >+ * get_object_sid_as_tdb_data failure. >+ */ >+static void test_clear_bad_password_indicator_get_object_sid_failed( >+ void **state) >+{ >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ /* >+ * The created message does not contain an objectSid, so >+ * get_object_sid_as_tdb_data will fail. >+ */ >+ msg = create_message(ctx); >+ >+ before = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ >+ status = authsam_clear_bad_password_indicator(ldb, ctx, msg); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR, status)); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * clear_bad_password_indicator >+ * >+ * dbwrap_delete failure. >+ */ >+static void test_clear_bad_password_indicator_dbwrap_store_failed( >+ void **state) >+{ >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ msg = create_message(ctx); >+ add_sid(msg, "S-1-5-21-2470180966-3899876309-2637894779-1010"); >+ >+ dbwrap_delete_ret = NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_DB_CORRUPTION; >+ >+ before = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ >+ status = authsam_clear_bad_password_indicator(ldb, ctx, msg); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_EQUAL(NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_DB_CORRUPTION, status)); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+/* >+ * clear_bad_password_indicator >+ * >+ * dbwrap_delete returns NT_STATUS_NOT_FOUND. >+ */ >+static void test_clear_bad_pwd_indicator_dbwrap_store_not_found( >+ void **state) >+{ >+ struct ldb_context *ldb = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx = NULL; >+ NTSTATUS status; >+ size_t before = 0; >+ size_t after = 0; >+ >+ ctx = talloc_new(*state); >+ assert_non_null(ctx); >+ >+ ldb = ldb_init(ctx, NULL); >+ assert_non_null(ldb); >+ >+ msg = create_message(ctx); >+ add_sid(msg, "S-1-5-21-2470180966-3899876309-2637894779-1010"); >+ >+ dbwrap_delete_ret = NT_STATUS_NOT_FOUND; >+ >+ before = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ >+ status = authsam_clear_bad_password_indicator(ldb, ctx, msg); >+ assert_true(NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check that all allocated memory was freed >+ */ >+ after = talloc_total_size(ctx); >+ assert_int_equal(before, after); >+ >+ /* >+ * Clean up >+ */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(ctx); >+} >+ >+int main(int argc, const char **argv) >+{ >+ const struct CMUnitTest tests[] = { >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_reread_read_failure, setup, teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_reread_missing_account_control, setup, teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_reread_account_locked, setup, teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_reread_account_not_locked, setup, teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_update_bad_domain_dn_search_failed, >+ setup, >+ teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_update_bad_get_pso_failed, setup, teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_update_bad_start_txn_failed, setup, teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_update_bad_reread_failed, setup, teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_update_bad_reread_locked_out, setup, teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_update_bad_update_count_failed, setup, teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_update_bad_no_update_required, setup, teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_update_bad_build_mod_request_failed, >+ setup, >+ teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_update_bad_add_control_failed, setup, teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_update_bad_ldb_request_failed, setup, teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_update_bad_ldb_wait_failed, setup, teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_update_bad_txn_cancel_failed, setup, teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_update_bad_commit_failed, setup, teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_success_accounting_start_txn_failed, >+ setup, >+ teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_success_accounting_reread_failed, >+ setup, >+ teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_success_accounting_ldb_msg_new_failed, >+ setup, >+ teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_success_accounting_samdb_rodc_failed, >+ setup, >+ teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_success_accounting_update_lastlogon_failed, >+ setup, >+ teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_success_accounting_build_mod_req_failed, >+ setup, >+ teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_success_accounting_add_control_failed, >+ setup, >+ teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_success_accounting_ldb_request_failed, >+ setup, >+ teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_success_accounting_ldb_wait_failed, >+ setup, >+ teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_success_accounting_commit_failed, >+ setup, >+ teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_success_accounting_rollback_failed, >+ setup, >+ teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_success_accounting_spurious_bad_pwd_indicator, >+ setup, >+ teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_get_bad_password_get_opaque_failed, >+ setup, >+ teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_get_bad_password_db_open_failed, >+ setup, >+ teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_set_bad_password_indicator_get_db_failed, >+ setup, >+ teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_set_bad_password_indicator_get_object_sid_failed, >+ setup, >+ teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_set_bad_password_indicator_dbwrap_store_failed, >+ setup, >+ teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_check_bad_password_indicator_get_db_failed, >+ setup, >+ teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_check_bad_password_indicator_get_object_sid_failed, >+ setup, >+ teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_clear_bad_password_indicator_get_db_failed, >+ setup, >+ teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_clear_bad_password_indicator_get_object_sid_failed, >+ setup, >+ teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_clear_bad_password_indicator_dbwrap_store_failed, >+ setup, >+ teardown), >+ cmocka_unit_test_setup_teardown( >+ test_clear_bad_pwd_indicator_dbwrap_store_not_found, >+ setup, >+ teardown), >+ }; >+ >+ cmocka_set_message_output(CM_OUTPUT_SUBUNIT); >+ return cmocka_run_group_tests(tests, NULL, NULL); >+} >diff --git a/source4/auth/wscript_build b/source4/auth/wscript_build >index 381a7b19bf0..ff1a61a9566 100644 >--- a/source4/auth/wscript_build >+++ b/source4/auth/wscript_build >@@ -49,6 +49,17 @@ bld.SAMBA_BINARY('test_kerberos', > for_selftest=True > ) > >+bld.SAMBA_BINARY('test_auth_sam', >+ source='tests/sam.c', >+ deps='cmocka samdb samba-security ldb tevent', >+ local_include=False, >+ for_selftest=True, >+ ldflags=''' >+ -Wl,--wrap,dsdb_search_dn >+ -Wl,--wrap,samdb_msg_add_int64 >+ ''' >+ ) >+ > pytalloc_util = bld.pyembed_libname('pytalloc-util') > pyparam_util = bld.pyembed_libname('pyparam_util') > pyldb_util = bld.pyembed_libname('pyldb-util') >-- >2.35.0 > > >From 77763b8756c4dfa578d4bb0545ae075d7eb3e536 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 20:17:49 +1200 >Subject: [PATCH 08/25] CVE-2021-20251 auth4: Detect ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT error > for password change > >This is more specific than NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL, and for the SAMR >password change, matches the result the call to samdb_result_passwords() >would give. > >BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611 > >Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >--- > source4/dsdb/common/util.c | 7 ++++++- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >diff --git a/source4/dsdb/common/util.c b/source4/dsdb/common/util.c >index 19667ee8611..0f17cbac1d2 100644 >--- a/source4/dsdb/common/util.c >+++ b/source4/dsdb/common/util.c >@@ -2230,7 +2230,8 @@ int samdb_set_password_callback(struct ldb_request *req, struct ldb_reply *ares) > * change failed. > * > * Results: NT_STATUS_OK, NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER, NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL, >- * NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD, NT_STATUS_PASSWORD_RESTRICTION >+ * NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD, NT_STATUS_PASSWORD_RESTRICTION, >+ * NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED, NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT, NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY > */ > static NTSTATUS samdb_set_password_internal(struct ldb_context *ldb, TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, > struct ldb_dn *user_dn, struct ldb_dn *domain_dn, >@@ -2403,6 +2404,9 @@ static NTSTATUS samdb_set_password_internal(struct ldb_context *ldb, TALLOC_CTX > if (W_ERROR_EQUAL(werr, WERR_PASSWORD_RESTRICTION)) { > status = NT_STATUS_PASSWORD_RESTRICTION; > } >+ if (W_ERROR_EQUAL(werr, WERR_ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT)) { >+ status = NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT; >+ } > } > } else if (ret == LDB_ERR_NO_SUCH_OBJECT) { > /* don't let the caller know if an account doesn't exist */ >@@ -2452,6 +2456,7 @@ NTSTATUS samdb_set_password(struct ldb_context *ldb, TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, > * Results: NT_STATUS_OK, NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_DB_CORRUPTION, > * NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER, NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL, > * NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD, NT_STATUS_PASSWORD_RESTRICTION, >+ * NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED, NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT, NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY > * NT_STATUS_TRANSACTION_ABORTED, NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER > */ > NTSTATUS samdb_set_password_sid(struct ldb_context *ldb, TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, >-- >2.35.0 > > >From cf4470624cdecb81f2a4946a7023b5b59e5aea7f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> >Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 18:01:39 +1300 >Subject: [PATCH 09/25] CVE-2021-20251 s4 auth: make bad password count > increment atomic > >Ensure that the bad password count is incremented atomically, >and that the successful logon accounting data is updated atomically. > >Use bad password indicator (in a distinct TDB) to determine if to open a transaction > >We open a transaction when we have seen the hint that this user >has recorded a bad password. This allows us to avoid always >needing one, while not missing a possible lockout. > >We also go back and get a transation if we did not take out >one out but we chose to do a write (eg for lastLogonTimestamp) > >Based on patches by Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz> > >BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611 > >Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> >Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >--- > selftest/knownfail.d/auth-sam | 12 -- > selftest/knownfail_heimdal_kdc | 6 - > selftest/knownfail_mit_kdc | 4 - > source4/auth/sam.c | 296 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > 4 files changed, 246 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/selftest/knownfail.d/auth-sam b/selftest/knownfail.d/auth-sam >index e87e43d509b..048459e6555 100644 >--- a/selftest/knownfail.d/auth-sam >+++ b/selftest/knownfail.d/auth-sam >@@ -11,15 +11,3 @@ > ^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_success_accounting_spurious_bad_pwd_indicator.none > ^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_success_accounting_start_txn_failed.none > ^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_success_accounting_update_lastlogon_failed.none >-^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_update_bad_add_control_failed.none >-^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_update_bad_build_mod_request_failed.none >-^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_update_bad_commit_failed.none >-^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_update_bad_get_pso_failed.none >-^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_update_bad_ldb_request_failed.none >-^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_update_bad_ldb_wait_failed.none >-^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_update_bad_no_update_required.none >-^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_update_bad_reread_failed.none >-^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_update_bad_reread_locked_out.none >-^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_update_bad_start_txn_failed.none >-^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_update_bad_txn_cancel_failed.none >-^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_update_bad_update_count_failed.none >diff --git a/selftest/knownfail_heimdal_kdc b/selftest/knownfail_heimdal_kdc >index d3e2997387d..c0335bf4b52 100644 >--- a/selftest/knownfail_heimdal_kdc >+++ b/selftest/knownfail_heimdal_kdc >@@ -57,11 +57,5 @@ > # > # Lockout tests > # >-^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_bad_pwd_count_transaction_kdc.ad_dc:local >-^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_bad_pwd_count_transaction_ntlm.ad_dc:local >-^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_bad_pwd_count_transaction_rename_kdc.ad_dc:local >-^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_bad_pwd_count_transaction_rename_ntlm.ad_dc:local >-^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_bad_pwd_count_transaction_rename_samr.ad_dc:local >-^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_bad_pwd_count_transaction_samr.ad_dc:local > ^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_lockout_race_kdc.ad_dc:local > ^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_lockout_race_ntlm.ad_dc:local >diff --git a/selftest/knownfail_mit_kdc b/selftest/knownfail_mit_kdc >index f5a2fea79c8..c92248af12d 100644 >--- a/selftest/knownfail_mit_kdc >+++ b/selftest/knownfail_mit_kdc >@@ -437,11 +437,7 @@ samba.tests.krb5.as_canonicalization_tests.samba.tests.krb5.as_canonicalization_ > # Lockout tests > # > ^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_bad_pwd_count_transaction_kdc.ad_dc:local >-^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_bad_pwd_count_transaction_ntlm.ad_dc:local > ^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_bad_pwd_count_transaction_rename_kdc.ad_dc:local >-^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_bad_pwd_count_transaction_rename_ntlm.ad_dc:local >-^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_bad_pwd_count_transaction_rename_samr.ad_dc:local >-^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_bad_pwd_count_transaction_samr.ad_dc:local > ^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_lockout_race_kdc.ad_dc:local > ^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_lockout_race_ntlm.ad_dc:local > ^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_lockout_transaction_bad_pwd_kdc.ad_dc:local >diff --git a/source4/auth/sam.c b/source4/auth/sam.c >index 85a23075c4e..cd81efe81c4 100644 >--- a/source4/auth/sam.c >+++ b/source4/auth/sam.c >@@ -1073,7 +1073,9 @@ NTSTATUS authsam_update_bad_pwd_count(struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, > NTSTATUS status; > struct ldb_result *domain_res; > struct ldb_message *msg_mod = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *current = NULL; > struct ldb_message *pso_msg = NULL; >+ bool txn_active = false; > TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx; > > mem_ctx = talloc_new(msg); >@@ -1098,14 +1100,65 @@ NTSTATUS authsam_update_bad_pwd_count(struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, > ret, ldb_dn_get_linearized(msg->dn)); > } > >- status = dsdb_update_bad_pwd_count(mem_ctx, sam_ctx, >- msg, domain_res->msgs[0], pso_msg, >- &msg_mod); >+ /* >+ * To ensure that the bad password count is updated atomically, >+ * we need to: >+ * begin a transaction >+ * re-read the account details, >+ * using the <GUID= part of the DN >+ * update the bad password count >+ * commit the transaction. >+ */ >+ >+ /* >+ * Start a new transaction >+ */ >+ ret = ldb_transaction_start(sam_ctx); >+ if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { >+ status = NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR; >+ goto error; >+ } >+ txn_active = true; >+ >+ /* >+ * Re-read the account details, using the GUID in case the DN >+ * is being changed. >+ */ >+ status = authsam_reread_user_logon_data( >+ sam_ctx, mem_ctx, msg, ¤t); > if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { >- TALLOC_FREE(mem_ctx); >- return status; >+ /* The re-read can return account locked out, as well >+ * as an internal error >+ */ >+ if (NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT)) { >+ /* >+ * For NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT we want to commit >+ * the transaction. Again to avoid cluttering the >+ * audit logs with spurious errors >+ */ >+ goto exit; >+ } >+ goto error; > } > >+ /* >+ * Update the bad password count and if required lock the account >+ */ >+ status = dsdb_update_bad_pwd_count( >+ mem_ctx, >+ sam_ctx, >+ current, >+ domain_res->msgs[0], >+ pso_msg, >+ &msg_mod); >+ if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { >+ status = NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR; >+ goto error; >+ } >+ >+ /* >+ * Write the data back to disk if required. >+ */ > if (msg_mod != NULL) { > struct ldb_request *req; > >@@ -1116,7 +1169,9 @@ NTSTATUS authsam_update_bad_pwd_count(struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, > ldb_op_default_callback, > NULL); > if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { >- goto done; >+ TALLOC_FREE(msg_mod); >+ status = NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR; >+ goto error; > } > > ret = ldb_request_add_control(req, >@@ -1124,31 +1179,72 @@ NTSTATUS authsam_update_bad_pwd_count(struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, > false, NULL); > if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { > talloc_free(req); >- goto done; >+ status = NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR; >+ goto error; > } > >- ret = dsdb_autotransaction_request(sam_ctx, req); >+ /* >+ * As we're in a transaction, make the ldb request directly >+ * to avoid the nested transaction that would result if we >+ * called dsdb_autotransaction_request >+ */ >+ ret = ldb_request(sam_ctx, req); >+ if (ret == LDB_SUCCESS) { >+ ret = ldb_wait(req->handle, LDB_WAIT_ALL); >+ } > talloc_free(req); >- >+ if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { >+ status = NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR; >+ goto error; >+ } > status = authsam_set_bad_password_indicator( > sam_ctx, mem_ctx, msg); >- /* Failure is ignored for now */ >+ if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { >+ goto error; >+ } > } >- >-done: >+ /* >+ * Note that we may not have updated the user record, but >+ * committing the transaction in that case is still the correct >+ * thing to do. >+ * If the transaction was cancelled, this would be logged by >+ * the dsdb audit log as a failure. When in fact it is expected >+ * behaviour. >+ */ >+exit: >+ TALLOC_FREE(mem_ctx); >+ ret = ldb_transaction_commit(sam_ctx); > if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { >- DBG_ERR("Failed to update badPwdCount, badPasswordTime or " >- "set lockoutTime on %s: %s\n", >- ldb_dn_get_linearized(msg->dn), >- ldb_errstring(sam_ctx)); >- TALLOC_FREE(mem_ctx); >+ DBG_ERR("Error (%d) %s, committing transaction," >+ " while updating bad password count" >+ " for (%s)\n", >+ ret, >+ ldb_errstring(sam_ctx), >+ ldb_dn_get_linearized(msg->dn)); > return NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR; > } >+ return status; > >+error: >+ DBG_ERR("Failed to update badPwdCount, badPasswordTime or " >+ "set lockoutTime on %s: %s\n", >+ ldb_dn_get_linearized(msg->dn), >+ ldb_errstring(sam_ctx) != NULL ? >+ ldb_errstring(sam_ctx) :nt_errstr(status)); >+ if (txn_active) { >+ ret = ldb_transaction_cancel(sam_ctx); >+ if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { >+ DBG_ERR("Error rolling back transaction," >+ " while updating bad password count" >+ " on %s: %s\n", >+ ldb_dn_get_linearized(msg->dn), >+ ldb_errstring(sam_ctx)); >+ } >+ } > TALLOC_FREE(mem_ctx); >- return NT_STATUS_OK; >-} >+ return status; > >+} > > static NTSTATUS authsam_update_lastlogon_timestamp(struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, > struct ldb_message *msg_mod, >@@ -1296,6 +1392,7 @@ NTSTATUS authsam_logon_success_accounting(struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, > NTTIME now; > NTTIME lastLogonTimestamp; > bool am_rodc = false; >+ bool txn_active = false; > bool need_db_reread; > > mem_ctx = talloc_new(msg); >@@ -1303,15 +1400,41 @@ NTSTATUS authsam_logon_success_accounting(struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, > return NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY; > } > >+ /* >+ * Any update of the last logon data, needs to be done inside a >+ * transaction. >+ * And the user data needs to be re-read, and the account re-checked >+ * for lockout. >+ * >+ * Howevver we have long-running transactions like replication >+ * that could otherwise grind the system to a halt so we first >+ * determine if *this* account has seen a bad password, >+ * otherwise we only start a transaction if there was a need >+ * (because a change was to be made). >+ */ >+ > status = authsam_check_bad_password_indicator( > sam_ctx, mem_ctx, &need_db_reread, msg); > if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { > return status; > } > >+get_transaction: >+ > if (need_db_reread) { > struct ldb_message *current = NULL; > >+ /* >+ * Start a new transaction >+ */ >+ ret = ldb_transaction_start(sam_ctx); >+ if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { >+ status = NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR; >+ goto error; >+ } >+ >+ txn_active = true; >+ > /* > * Re-read the account details, using the GUID > * embedded in DN so this is safe against a race where >@@ -1324,7 +1447,15 @@ NTSTATUS authsam_logon_success_accounting(struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, > * The re-read can return account locked out, as well > * as an internal error > */ >- return status; >+ if (NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT)) { >+ /* >+ * For NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT we want to commit >+ * the transaction. Again to avoid cluttering the >+ * audit logs with spurious errors >+ */ >+ goto exit; >+ } >+ goto error; > } > msg = current; > } >@@ -1345,9 +1476,15 @@ NTSTATUS authsam_logon_success_accounting(struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, > > msg_mod = ldb_msg_new(mem_ctx); > if (msg_mod == NULL) { >- TALLOC_FREE(mem_ctx); >- return NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY; >+ status = NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY; >+ goto error; > } >+ >+ /* >+ * By using the DN from msg->dn directly, we allow LDB to >+ * prefer the embedded GUID form, so this is actually quite >+ * safe even in the case where DN has been changed >+ */ > msg_mod->dn = msg->dn; > > if (lockoutTime != 0) { >@@ -1356,14 +1493,14 @@ NTSTATUS authsam_logon_success_accounting(struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, > */ > ret = samdb_msg_add_int(sam_ctx, msg_mod, msg_mod, "lockoutTime", 0); > if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { >- TALLOC_FREE(mem_ctx); >- return NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY; >+ status = NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY; >+ goto error; > } > } else if (badPwdCount != 0) { > ret = samdb_msg_add_int(sam_ctx, msg_mod, msg_mod, "badPwdCount", 0); > if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { >- TALLOC_FREE(mem_ctx); >- return NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY; >+ status = NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY; >+ goto error; > } > } > >@@ -1375,8 +1512,8 @@ NTSTATUS authsam_logon_success_accounting(struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, > ret = samdb_msg_add_int64(sam_ctx, msg_mod, msg_mod, > "lastLogon", now); > if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { >- TALLOC_FREE(mem_ctx); >- return NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY; >+ status = NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY; >+ goto error; > } > } > >@@ -1390,8 +1527,8 @@ NTSTATUS authsam_logon_success_accounting(struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, > ret = samdb_msg_add_int(sam_ctx, msg_mod, msg_mod, > "logonCount", logonCount); > if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { >- TALLOC_FREE(mem_ctx); >- return NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY; >+ status = NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY; >+ goto error; > } > } else { > /* Set an unset logonCount to 0 on first successful login */ >@@ -1407,16 +1544,16 @@ NTSTATUS authsam_logon_success_accounting(struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, > > ret = samdb_rodc(sam_ctx, &am_rodc); > if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { >- TALLOC_FREE(mem_ctx); >- return NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR; >+ status = NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR; >+ goto error; > } > > if (!am_rodc) { > status = authsam_update_lastlogon_timestamp(sam_ctx, msg_mod, domain_dn, > lastLogonTimestamp, now); > if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { >- TALLOC_FREE(mem_ctx); >- return NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY; >+ status = NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY; >+ goto error; > } > } else { > /* Perform the (async) SendToSAM calls for MS-SAMS */ >@@ -1436,6 +1573,16 @@ NTSTATUS authsam_logon_success_accounting(struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, > unsigned int i; > struct ldb_request *req; > >+ /* >+ * If it turns out we are going to update the DB, go >+ * back to the start, get a transaction and the >+ * current DB state and try again >+ */ >+ if (txn_active == false) { >+ need_db_reread = true; >+ goto get_transaction; >+ } >+ > /* mark all the message elements as LDB_FLAG_MOD_REPLACE */ > for (i=0;i<msg_mod->num_elements;i++) { > msg_mod->elements[i].flags = LDB_FLAG_MOD_REPLACE; >@@ -1448,35 +1595,84 @@ NTSTATUS authsam_logon_success_accounting(struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, > ldb_op_default_callback, > NULL); > if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { >- goto done; >+ status = NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR; >+ goto error; > } > > ret = ldb_request_add_control(req, > DSDB_CONTROL_FORCE_RODC_LOCAL_CHANGE, > false, NULL); > if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { >- talloc_free(req); >- goto done; >+ TALLOC_FREE(req); >+ status = NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR; >+ goto error; > } >- >- ret = dsdb_autotransaction_request(sam_ctx, req); >- talloc_free(req); >+ /* >+ * As we're in a transaction, make the ldb request directly >+ * to avoid the nested transaction that would result if we >+ * called dsdb_autotransaction_request >+ */ >+ ret = ldb_request(sam_ctx, req); >+ if (ret == LDB_SUCCESS) { >+ ret = ldb_wait(req->handle, LDB_WAIT_ALL); >+ } >+ TALLOC_FREE(req); >+ if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { >+ status = NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR; >+ goto error; >+ } >+ } >+ status = authsam_clear_bad_password_indicator(sam_ctx, mem_ctx, msg); >+ if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { >+ goto error; > } > >- status = authsam_clear_bad_password_indicator(sam_ctx, mem_ctx, msg); >- /* Failure is ignored for now */ >+ /* >+ * Note that we may not have updated the user record, but >+ * committing the transaction in that case is still the correct >+ * thing to do. >+ * If the transaction was cancelled, this would be logged by >+ * the dsdb audit log as a failure. When in fact it is expected >+ * behaviour. >+ * >+ * Thankfully both TDB and LMDB seem to optimise for the empty >+ * transaction case >+ */ >+exit: >+ TALLOC_FREE(mem_ctx); > >-done: >+ if (txn_active == false) { >+ return status; >+ } >+ >+ ret = ldb_transaction_commit(sam_ctx); > if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { >- DEBUG(0, ("Failed to set badPwdCount and lockoutTime " >- "to 0 and/or lastlogon to now (%lld) " >- "%s: %s\n", (long long int)now, >- ldb_dn_get_linearized(msg_mod->dn), >- ldb_errstring(sam_ctx))); >- TALLOC_FREE(mem_ctx); >+ DBG_ERR("Error (%d) %s, committing transaction," >+ " while updating successful logon accounting" >+ " for (%s)\n", >+ ret, >+ ldb_errstring(sam_ctx), >+ ldb_dn_get_linearized(msg->dn)); > return NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR; > } >+ return status; > >+error: >+ DBG_ERR("Failed to update badPwdCount, badPasswordTime or " >+ "set lockoutTime on %s: %s\n", >+ ldb_dn_get_linearized(msg->dn), >+ ldb_errstring(sam_ctx) != NULL ? >+ ldb_errstring(sam_ctx) :nt_errstr(status)); >+ if (txn_active) { >+ ret = ldb_transaction_cancel(sam_ctx); >+ if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { >+ DBG_ERR("Error rolling back transaction," >+ " while updating bad password count" >+ " on %s: %s\n", >+ ldb_dn_get_linearized(msg->dn), >+ ldb_errstring(sam_ctx)); >+ } >+ } > TALLOC_FREE(mem_ctx); >- return NT_STATUS_OK; >+ return status; > } >-- >2.35.0 > > >From 28b9d162d363d4284dfce453351d6e80b28f03a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> >Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 16:35:44 +1300 >Subject: [PATCH 10/25] CVE-2021-20251 auth4: Add missing newline to debug > message on PSO read failure > >BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611 > >Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> >Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >--- > source4/auth/sam.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >diff --git a/source4/auth/sam.c b/source4/auth/sam.c >index cd81efe81c4..d672706d6c6 100644 >--- a/source4/auth/sam.c >+++ b/source4/auth/sam.c >@@ -1096,7 +1096,7 @@ NTSTATUS authsam_update_bad_pwd_count(struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, > * fallback to using the domain defaults so that we still > * record the bad password attempt > */ >- DBG_ERR("Error (%d) checking PSO for %s", >+ DBG_ERR("Error (%d) checking PSO for %s\n", > ret, ldb_dn_get_linearized(msg->dn)); > } > >-- >2.35.0 > > >From 51fc9b05e677c50e8f056ecccaf6f1a3dd29299a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz> >Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 11:30:59 +1300 >Subject: [PATCH 11/25] CVE-2021-20251 auth4: Return only the result message > and free the surrounding result > >BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611 > >Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> >Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >--- > selftest/knownfail.d/auth-sam | 1 - > source4/auth/sam.c | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/selftest/knownfail.d/auth-sam b/selftest/knownfail.d/auth-sam >index 048459e6555..438cea46415 100644 >--- a/selftest/knownfail.d/auth-sam >+++ b/selftest/knownfail.d/auth-sam >@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@ >-^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_reread_account_not_locked.none > ^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_success_accounting_add_control_failed.none > ^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_success_accounting_build_mod_req_failed.none > ^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_success_accounting_commit_failed.none >diff --git a/source4/auth/sam.c b/source4/auth/sam.c >index d672706d6c6..e4e88405c40 100644 >--- a/source4/auth/sam.c >+++ b/source4/auth/sam.c >@@ -885,7 +885,8 @@ NTSTATUS authsam_reread_user_logon_data( > TALLOC_FREE(res); > return NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT; > } >- *current = res->msgs[0]; >+ *current = talloc_steal(mem_ctx, res->msgs[0]); >+ TALLOC_FREE(res); > return NT_STATUS_OK; > } > >-- >2.35.0 > > >From e116fc496f78c6f3b33aad67c51f821d484128c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> >Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 14:42:39 +1300 >Subject: [PATCH 12/25] CVE-2021-20251 auth4: Split > authsam_calculate_lastlogon_sync_interval() out > >authsam_calculate_lastlogon_sync_interval() is split out of authsam_update_lastlogon_timestamp() > >Based on work by Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz> > >BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611 > >Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> >Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >--- > source4/auth/sam.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- > 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/source4/auth/sam.c b/source4/auth/sam.c >index e4e88405c40..eb22cd8d2a3 100644 >--- a/source4/auth/sam.c >+++ b/source4/auth/sam.c >@@ -1247,40 +1247,36 @@ error: > > } > >-static NTSTATUS authsam_update_lastlogon_timestamp(struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, >- struct ldb_message *msg_mod, >- struct ldb_dn *domain_dn, >- NTTIME old_timestamp, >- NTTIME now) >+/* >+ * msDS-LogonTimeSyncInterval is an int32_t number of days. >+ * >+ * The docs say: "the initial update, after the domain functional >+ * level is raised to DS_BEHAVIOR_WIN2003 or higher, is calculated as >+ * 14 days minus a random percentage of 5 days", but we aren't doing >+ * that. The blogosphere seems to think that this randomised update >+ * happens everytime, but [MS-ADA1] doesn't agree. >+ * >+ * Dochelp referred us to the following blog post: >+ * http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2009/04/15/the-lastlogontimestamp-attribute-what-it-was-designed-for-and-how-it-works.aspx >+ * >+ * when msDS-LogonTimeSyncInterval is zero, the lastLogonTimestamp is >+ * not changed. >+ */ >+ >+static NTSTATUS authsam_calculate_lastlogon_sync_interval( >+ struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, >+ TALLOC_CTX *ctx, >+ struct ldb_dn *domain_dn, >+ NTTIME *sync_interval_nt) > { >- /* >- * We only set lastLogonTimestamp if the current value is older than >- * now - msDS-LogonTimeSyncInterval days. >- * >- * msDS-LogonTimeSyncInterval is an int32_t number of days, while >- * lastLogonTimestamp is in the 64 bit 100ns NTTIME format. >- * >- * The docs say: "the initial update, after the domain functional >- * level is raised to DS_BEHAVIOR_WIN2003 or higher, is calculated as >- * 14 days minus a random percentage of 5 days", but we aren't doing >- * that. The blogosphere seems to think that this randomised update >- * happens everytime, but [MS-ADA1] doesn't agree. >- * >- * Dochelp referred us to the following blog post: >- * http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2009/04/15/the-lastlogontimestamp-attribute-what-it-was-designed-for-and-how-it-works.aspx >- * >- * en msDS-LogonTimeSyncInterval is zero, the lastLogonTimestamp is >- * not changed. >- */ > static const char *attrs[] = { "msDS-LogonTimeSyncInterval", > NULL }; > int ret; > struct ldb_result *domain_res = NULL; > TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx = NULL; >- int32_t sync_interval; >- NTTIME sync_interval_nt; >+ uint32_t sync_interval; > >- mem_ctx = talloc_new(msg_mod); >+ mem_ctx = talloc_new(ctx); > if (mem_ctx == NULL) { > return NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY; > } >@@ -1296,15 +1292,7 @@ static NTSTATUS authsam_update_lastlogon_timestamp(struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, > "msDS-LogonTimeSyncInterval", > 14); > DEBUG(5, ("sync interval is %d\n", sync_interval)); >- if (sync_interval == 0){ >- /* >- * Setting msDS-LogonTimeSyncInterval to zero is how you ask >- * that nothing happens here. >- */ >- TALLOC_FREE(mem_ctx); >- return NT_STATUS_OK; >- } >- else if (sync_interval >= 5){ >+ if (sync_interval >= 5){ > /* > * Subtract "a random percentage of 5" days. Presumably this > * percentage is between 0 and 100, and modulus is accurate >@@ -1312,17 +1300,47 @@ static NTSTATUS authsam_update_lastlogon_timestamp(struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, > */ > uint32_t r = generate_random() % 6; > sync_interval -= r; >- DEBUG(5, ("randomised sync interval is %d (-%d)\n", sync_interval, r)); >+ DBG_INFO("randomised sync interval is %d (-%d)\n", sync_interval, r); > } > /* In the case where sync_interval < 5 there is no randomisation */ > >- sync_interval_nt = sync_interval * 24LL * 3600LL * 10000000LL; >+ /* >+ * msDS-LogonTimeSyncInterval is an int32_t number of days, >+ * while lastLogonTimestamp (to be updated) is in the 64 bit >+ * 100ns NTTIME format so we must convert. >+ */ >+ *sync_interval_nt = sync_interval * 24LL * 3600LL * 10000000LL; >+ TALLOC_FREE(mem_ctx); >+ return NT_STATUS_OK; >+} > >+ >+/* >+ * We only set lastLogonTimestamp if the current value is older than >+ * now - msDS-LogonTimeSyncInterval days. >+ * >+ * lastLogonTimestamp is in the 64 bit 100ns NTTIME format >+ */ >+static NTSTATUS authsam_update_lastlogon_timestamp(struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, >+ struct ldb_message *msg_mod, >+ struct ldb_dn *domain_dn, >+ NTTIME old_timestamp, >+ NTTIME now, >+ NTTIME sync_interval_nt) >+{ >+ int ret; > DEBUG(5, ("old timestamp is %lld, threshold %lld, diff %lld\n", > (long long int)old_timestamp, > (long long int)(now - sync_interval_nt), > (long long int)(old_timestamp - now + sync_interval_nt))); > >+ if (sync_interval_nt == 0){ >+ /* >+ * Setting msDS-LogonTimeSyncInterval to zero is how you ask >+ * that nothing happens here. >+ */ >+ return NT_STATUS_OK; >+ } > if (old_timestamp > now){ > DEBUG(0, ("lastLogonTimestamp is in the future! (%lld > %lld)\n", > (long long int)old_timestamp, (long long int)now)); >@@ -1337,11 +1355,9 @@ static NTSTATUS authsam_update_lastlogon_timestamp(struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, > "lastLogonTimestamp", now); > > if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { >- TALLOC_FREE(mem_ctx); > return NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY; > } > } >- TALLOC_FREE(mem_ctx); > return NT_STATUS_OK; > } > >@@ -1550,8 +1566,23 @@ get_transaction: > } > > if (!am_rodc) { >- status = authsam_update_lastlogon_timestamp(sam_ctx, msg_mod, domain_dn, >- lastLogonTimestamp, now); >+ NTTIME sync_interval_nt; >+ >+ status = authsam_calculate_lastlogon_sync_interval( >+ sam_ctx, mem_ctx, domain_dn, &sync_interval_nt); >+ >+ if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { >+ status = NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR; >+ goto error; >+ } >+ >+ status = authsam_update_lastlogon_timestamp( >+ sam_ctx, >+ msg_mod, >+ domain_dn, >+ lastLogonTimestamp, >+ now, >+ sync_interval_nt); > if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { > status = NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY; > goto error; >-- >2.35.0 > > >From 5ac555e762d5eff8a8031a01dbc1084c9f571a15 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> >Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 15:33:08 +1300 >Subject: [PATCH 13/25] CVE-2021-20251 auth4: Inline > samdb_result_effective_badPwdCount() in authsam_logon_success_accounting() > >By bringing this function inline it can then be split out in a >subsequent commit. > >Based on work by Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz> > >BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611 > >Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> >Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >--- > source4/auth/sam.c | 13 ++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/source4/auth/sam.c b/source4/auth/sam.c >index eb22cd8d2a3..1551638f09a 100644 >--- a/source4/auth/sam.c >+++ b/source4/auth/sam.c >@@ -1479,11 +1479,17 @@ get_transaction: > > lockoutTime = ldb_msg_find_attr_as_int64(msg, "lockoutTime", 0); > dbBadPwdCount = ldb_msg_find_attr_as_int(msg, "badPwdCount", 0); >+ tv_now = timeval_current(); >+ now = timeval_to_nttime(&tv_now); >+ > if (interactive_or_kerberos) { > badPwdCount = dbBadPwdCount; > } else { >- badPwdCount = samdb_result_effective_badPwdCount(sam_ctx, mem_ctx, >- domain_dn, msg); >+ int64_t lockOutObservationWindow = >+ samdb_result_msds_LockoutObservationWindow( >+ sam_ctx, mem_ctx, domain_dn, msg); >+ badPwdCount = dsdb_effective_badPwdCount( >+ msg, lockOutObservationWindow, now); > } > lastLogonTimestamp = > ldb_msg_find_attr_as_int64(msg, "lastLogonTimestamp", 0); >@@ -1521,9 +1527,6 @@ get_transaction: > } > } > >- tv_now = timeval_current(); >- now = timeval_to_nttime(&tv_now); >- > if (interactive_or_kerberos || > (badPwdCount != 0 && lockoutTime == 0)) { > ret = samdb_msg_add_int64(sam_ctx, msg_mod, msg_mod, >-- >2.35.0 > > >From 7fe1f6dd4d2e374dfe36d4d405d9f5cd57ebf947 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> >Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 16:48:31 +1300 >Subject: [PATCH 14/25] CVE-2021-20251 auth4: Avoid reading the database twice > by precaculating some variables > >These variables are not important to protect against a race with >and a double-read can easily be avoided by moving them up the file >a little. > >BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611 > >Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> >Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >--- > selftest/knownfail.d/auth-sam | 12 -------- > source4/auth/sam.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 selftest/knownfail.d/auth-sam > >diff --git a/selftest/knownfail.d/auth-sam b/selftest/knownfail.d/auth-sam >deleted file mode 100644 >index 438cea46415..00000000000 >--- a/selftest/knownfail.d/auth-sam >+++ /dev/null >@@ -1,12 +0,0 @@ >-^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_success_accounting_add_control_failed.none >-^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_success_accounting_build_mod_req_failed.none >-^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_success_accounting_commit_failed.none >-^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_success_accounting_ldb_msg_new_failed.none >-^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_success_accounting_ldb_request_failed.none >-^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_success_accounting_ldb_wait_failed.none >-^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_success_accounting_reread_failed.none >-^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_success_accounting_rollback_failed.none >-^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_success_accounting_samdb_rodc_failed.none >-^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_success_accounting_spurious_bad_pwd_indicator.none >-^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_success_accounting_start_txn_failed.none >-^samba.unittests.auth.sam.test_success_accounting_update_lastlogon_failed.none >diff --git a/source4/auth/sam.c b/source4/auth/sam.c >index 1551638f09a..7bb59d225a4 100644 >--- a/source4/auth/sam.c >+++ b/source4/auth/sam.c >@@ -1408,6 +1408,8 @@ NTSTATUS authsam_logon_success_accounting(struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, > struct timeval tv_now; > NTTIME now; > NTTIME lastLogonTimestamp; >+ int64_t lockOutObservationWindow; >+ NTTIME sync_interval_nt = 0; > bool am_rodc = false; > bool txn_active = false; > bool need_db_reread; >@@ -1436,6 +1438,36 @@ NTSTATUS authsam_logon_success_accounting(struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, > return status; > } > >+ if (interactive_or_kerberos == false) { >+ /* >+ * Avoid calculating this twice, it reads the PSO. A >+ * race on this is unimportant. >+ */ >+ lockOutObservationWindow >+ = samdb_result_msds_LockoutObservationWindow( >+ sam_ctx, mem_ctx, domain_dn, msg); >+ } >+ >+ ret = samdb_rodc(sam_ctx, &am_rodc); >+ if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { >+ status = NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR; >+ goto error; >+ } >+ >+ if (!am_rodc) { >+ /* >+ * Avoid reading the main domain DN twice. A race on >+ * this is unimportant. >+ */ >+ status = authsam_calculate_lastlogon_sync_interval( >+ sam_ctx, mem_ctx, domain_dn, &sync_interval_nt); >+ >+ if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { >+ status = NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR; >+ goto error; >+ } >+ } >+ > get_transaction: > > if (need_db_reread) { >@@ -1485,9 +1517,10 @@ get_transaction: > if (interactive_or_kerberos) { > badPwdCount = dbBadPwdCount; > } else { >- int64_t lockOutObservationWindow = >- samdb_result_msds_LockoutObservationWindow( >- sam_ctx, mem_ctx, domain_dn, msg); >+ /* >+ * We get lockOutObservationWindow above, before the >+ * transaction >+ */ > badPwdCount = dsdb_effective_badPwdCount( > msg, lockOutObservationWindow, now); > } >@@ -1562,23 +1595,7 @@ get_transaction: > } > } > >- ret = samdb_rodc(sam_ctx, &am_rodc); >- if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { >- status = NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR; >- goto error; >- } >- > if (!am_rodc) { >- NTTIME sync_interval_nt; >- >- status = authsam_calculate_lastlogon_sync_interval( >- sam_ctx, mem_ctx, domain_dn, &sync_interval_nt); >- >- if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { >- status = NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR; >- goto error; >- } >- > status = authsam_update_lastlogon_timestamp( > sam_ctx, > msg_mod, >-- >2.35.0 > > >From 98d5df64354890c62b6b36c38cbd08f2a8844512 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2022 15:53:51 +1200 >Subject: [PATCH 15/25] CVE-2021-20251 s4-auth: Pass through error code from > badPwdCount update > >The error code may be NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT, which we use in >preference to NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD. > >BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611 > >Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >--- > selftest/knownfail_heimdal_kdc | 1 - > selftest/knownfail_mit_kdc | 1 - > source4/auth/ntlm/auth_sam.c | 6 +++++- > 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/selftest/knownfail_heimdal_kdc b/selftest/knownfail_heimdal_kdc >index c0335bf4b52..eefa125b70f 100644 >--- a/selftest/knownfail_heimdal_kdc >+++ b/selftest/knownfail_heimdal_kdc >@@ -58,4 +58,3 @@ > # Lockout tests > # > ^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_lockout_race_kdc.ad_dc:local >-^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_lockout_race_ntlm.ad_dc:local >diff --git a/selftest/knownfail_mit_kdc b/selftest/knownfail_mit_kdc >index c92248af12d..7238826434b 100644 >--- a/selftest/knownfail_mit_kdc >+++ b/selftest/knownfail_mit_kdc >@@ -439,7 +439,6 @@ samba.tests.krb5.as_canonicalization_tests.samba.tests.krb5.as_canonicalization_ > ^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_bad_pwd_count_transaction_kdc.ad_dc:local > ^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_bad_pwd_count_transaction_rename_kdc.ad_dc:local > ^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_lockout_race_kdc.ad_dc:local >-^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_lockout_race_ntlm.ad_dc:local > ^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_lockout_transaction_bad_pwd_kdc.ad_dc:local > ^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_lockout_transaction_kdc.ad_dc:local > ^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_lockout_transaction_rename_kdc.ad_dc:local >diff --git a/source4/auth/ntlm/auth_sam.c b/source4/auth/ntlm/auth_sam.c >index 1077762c70e..882d92e26ed 100644 >--- a/source4/auth/ntlm/auth_sam.c >+++ b/source4/auth/ntlm/auth_sam.c >@@ -716,7 +716,11 @@ static NTSTATUS authsam_password_check_and_record(struct auth4_context *auth_con > } > > TALLOC_FREE(tmp_ctx); >- return NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD; >+ >+ if (NT_STATUS_IS_OK(nt_status)) { >+ nt_status = NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD; >+ } >+ return nt_status; > } > > static NTSTATUS authsam_authenticate(struct auth4_context *auth_context, >-- >2.35.0 > > >From 3488acde48f1656eede1b092cff32c02ca96f558 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2022 15:44:21 +1200 >Subject: [PATCH 16/25] CVE-2021-20251 s4:dsdb: Update bad password count > inside transaction > >Previously, there was a gap between calling dsdb_update_bad_pwd_count() >and dsdb_module_modify() where no transaction was in effect. Another >process could slip in and modify badPwdCount, only for our update to >immediately overwrite it. Doing the update inside the transaction will >help for the following commit when we make it atomic. > >BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611 > >Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >--- > .../dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c | 37 ++++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c >index e90482df63e..b9f7fb77e6f 100644 >--- a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c >+++ b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c >@@ -2733,24 +2733,6 @@ static int make_error_and_update_badPwdCount(struct setup_password_fields_io *io > int ret; /* The errors we will actually return */ > int dbg_ret; /* The errors we can only complain about in logs */ > >- /* PSO search result is optional (NULL if no PSO applies) */ >- if (io->ac->pso_res != NULL) { >- pso_msg = io->ac->pso_res->message; >- } >- >- status = dsdb_update_bad_pwd_count(io->ac, ldb, >- io->ac->search_res->message, >- io->ac->dom_res->message, >- pso_msg, >- &mod_msg); >- if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { >- goto done; >- } >- >- if (mod_msg == NULL) { >- goto done; >- } >- > /* > * OK, horrible semantics ahead. > * >@@ -2793,6 +2775,24 @@ static int make_error_and_update_badPwdCount(struct setup_password_fields_io *io > goto done; > } > >+ /* PSO search result is optional (NULL if no PSO applies) */ >+ if (io->ac->pso_res != NULL) { >+ pso_msg = io->ac->pso_res->message; >+ } >+ >+ status = dsdb_update_bad_pwd_count(io->ac, ldb, >+ io->ac->search_res->message, >+ io->ac->dom_res->message, >+ pso_msg, >+ &mod_msg); >+ if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { >+ goto end_transaction; >+ } >+ >+ if (mod_msg == NULL) { >+ goto end_transaction; >+ } >+ > dbg_ret = dsdb_module_modify(io->ac->module, mod_msg, > DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE, > io->ac->req); >@@ -2806,6 +2806,7 @@ static int make_error_and_update_badPwdCount(struct setup_password_fields_io *io > */ > } > >+end_transaction: > dbg_ret = ldb_next_end_trans(io->ac->module); > if (dbg_ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { > ldb_debug(ldb, LDB_DEBUG_ERROR, >-- >2.35.0 > > >From f6d6d4a16e61a394a23e28039f1159466846f349 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2022 15:54:12 +1200 >Subject: [PATCH 17/25] CVE-2021-20251 s4:dsdb: Make badPwdCount update atomic > >We reread the account details inside the transaction in case the account >has been locked out in the meantime. If it has, we return the >appropriate error code. > >BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611 > >Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >--- > selftest/flapping.d/ldap-pwd-change-race | 5 ---- > .../dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++-- > 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 selftest/flapping.d/ldap-pwd-change-race > >diff --git a/selftest/flapping.d/ldap-pwd-change-race b/selftest/flapping.d/ldap-pwd-change-race >deleted file mode 100644 >index 54ed56c1134..00000000000 >--- a/selftest/flapping.d/ldap-pwd-change-race >+++ /dev/null >@@ -1,5 +0,0 @@ >-# This test currently depends on a race. The password_hash dsdb module >-# relinquishes and immediately reacquires a transaction lock, and another >-# process may be able to acquire it during the short period of time in which it >-# is not held. >-^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_lockout_race_ldap_pw_change.ad_dc:local >diff --git a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c >index b9f7fb77e6f..17de28fe511 100644 >--- a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c >+++ b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c >@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ > #include "lib/crypto/md4.h" > #include "param/param.h" > #include "lib/krb5_wrap/krb5_samba.h" >+#include "auth/auth_sam.h" > #include "auth/common_auth.h" > #include "lib/messaging/messaging.h" > #include "lib/param/loadparm.h" >@@ -2729,6 +2730,7 @@ static int make_error_and_update_badPwdCount(struct setup_password_fields_io *io > struct ldb_context *ldb = ldb_module_get_ctx(io->ac->module); > struct ldb_message *mod_msg = NULL; > struct ldb_message *pso_msg = NULL; >+ struct ldb_message *current = NULL; > NTSTATUS status; > int ret; /* The errors we will actually return */ > int dbg_ret; /* The errors we can only complain about in logs */ >@@ -2775,13 +2777,28 @@ static int make_error_and_update_badPwdCount(struct setup_password_fields_io *io > goto done; > } > >+ /* >+ * Re-read the account details, using the GUID in case the DN >+ * is being changed. >+ */ >+ status = authsam_reread_user_logon_data( >+ ldb, io->ac, >+ io->ac->search_res->message, >+ ¤t); >+ if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { >+ /* The re-read can return account locked out, as well >+ * as an internal error >+ */ >+ goto end_transaction; >+ } >+ > /* PSO search result is optional (NULL if no PSO applies) */ > if (io->ac->pso_res != NULL) { > pso_msg = io->ac->pso_res->message; > } > > status = dsdb_update_bad_pwd_count(io->ac, ldb, >- io->ac->search_res->message, >+ current, > io->ac->dom_res->message, > pso_msg, > &mod_msg); >@@ -2831,7 +2848,11 @@ end_transaction: > > done: > ret = LDB_ERR_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION; >- *werror = WERR_INVALID_PASSWORD; >+ if (NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT)) { >+ *werror = WERR_ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT; >+ } else { >+ *werror = WERR_INVALID_PASSWORD; >+ } > ldb_asprintf_errstring(ldb, > "%08X: %s - check_password_restrictions: " > "The old password specified doesn't match!", >-- >2.35.0 > > >From 054106bec80fcb0aa9c20dd2cec5934cfd93dce7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 11:11:43 +1200 >Subject: [PATCH 18/25] CVE-2021-20251 s4:kdc: Move logon success accounting > code into existing branch > >This simplifies the code for the following commit. > >BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611 > >Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >--- > source4/kdc/hdb-samba4.c | 33 +++++++++++++-------------------- > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/source4/kdc/hdb-samba4.c b/source4/kdc/hdb-samba4.c >index 480d2c06e5e..b84750c2fba 100644 >--- a/source4/kdc/hdb-samba4.c >+++ b/source4/kdc/hdb-samba4.c >@@ -552,26 +552,6 @@ static krb5_error_code hdb_samba4_audit(krb5_context context, > } > > switch (hdb_auth_status) { >- case KDC_AUTH_EVENT_CLIENT_AUTHORIZED: >- { >- TALLOC_CTX *frame = talloc_stackframe(); >- struct samba_kdc_entry *p = talloc_get_type(entry->context, >- struct samba_kdc_entry); >- struct netr_SendToSamBase *send_to_sam = NULL; >- >- /* >- * TODO: We could log the AS-REQ authorization success here as >- * well. However before we do that, we need to pass >- * in the PAC here or re-calculate it. >- */ >- authsam_logon_success_accounting(kdc_db_ctx->samdb, p->msg, >- domain_dn, true, &send_to_sam); >- if (kdc_db_ctx->rodc && send_to_sam != NULL) { >- reset_bad_password_netlogon(frame, kdc_db_ctx, send_to_sam); >- } >- talloc_free(frame); >- } >- FALL_THROUGH; > default: > { > TALLOC_CTX *frame = talloc_stackframe(); >@@ -613,6 +593,19 @@ static krb5_error_code hdb_samba4_audit(krb5_context context, > ui.auth_description = auth_description; > > if (hdb_auth_status == KDC_AUTH_EVENT_CLIENT_AUTHORIZED) { >+ struct netr_SendToSamBase *send_to_sam = NULL; >+ >+ /* >+ * TODO: We could log the AS-REQ authorization success here as >+ * well. However before we do that, we need to pass >+ * in the PAC here or re-calculate it. >+ */ >+ authsam_logon_success_accounting(kdc_db_ctx->samdb, p->msg, >+ domain_dn, true, &send_to_sam); >+ if (kdc_db_ctx->rodc && send_to_sam != NULL) { >+ reset_bad_password_netlogon(frame, kdc_db_ctx, send_to_sam); >+ } >+ > /* This is the final sucess */ > status = NT_STATUS_OK; > } else if (hdb_auth_status == KDC_AUTH_EVENT_VALIDATED_LONG_TERM_KEY) { >-- >2.35.0 > > >From 545012802ef80316d59db5ff8cccefd656c112ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 15:04:41 +1200 >Subject: [PATCH 19/25] CVE-2021-20251 s4:kdc: Check return status of > authsam_logon_success_accounting() > >If we find that the user has been locked out sometime during the request >(due to a race), we will now return an error code. > >Note that we cannot avoid the MIT KDC aspect of the issue by checking >the return status of mit_samba_zero_bad_password_count(), because >kdb_vftabl::audit_as_req() returning void means we cannot pass on the >result. > >BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611 > >Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >--- > source4/kdc/hdb-samba4.c | 15 +++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/source4/kdc/hdb-samba4.c b/source4/kdc/hdb-samba4.c >index b84750c2fba..22922a23834 100644 >--- a/source4/kdc/hdb-samba4.c >+++ b/source4/kdc/hdb-samba4.c >@@ -600,14 +600,21 @@ static krb5_error_code hdb_samba4_audit(krb5_context context, > * well. However before we do that, we need to pass > * in the PAC here or re-calculate it. > */ >- authsam_logon_success_accounting(kdc_db_ctx->samdb, p->msg, >- domain_dn, true, &send_to_sam); >- if (kdc_db_ctx->rodc && send_to_sam != NULL) { >+ status = authsam_logon_success_accounting(kdc_db_ctx->samdb, p->msg, >+ domain_dn, true, &send_to_sam); >+ if (NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT)) { >+ final_ret = KRB5KDC_ERR_CLIENT_REVOKED; >+ r->error_code = final_ret; >+ rwdc_fallback = kdc_db_ctx->rodc; >+ } else if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { >+ final_ret = KRB5KRB_ERR_GENERIC; >+ r->error_code = final_ret; >+ rwdc_fallback = kdc_db_ctx->rodc; >+ } else if (kdc_db_ctx->rodc && send_to_sam != NULL) { > reset_bad_password_netlogon(frame, kdc_db_ctx, send_to_sam); > } > > /* This is the final sucess */ >- status = NT_STATUS_OK; > } else if (hdb_auth_status == KDC_AUTH_EVENT_VALIDATED_LONG_TERM_KEY) { > /* > * This was only a pre-authentication success, >-- >2.35.0 > > >From 4018e7ec1475881e6b2e0d3097794003bcc6c3db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2022 15:54:52 +1200 >Subject: [PATCH 20/25] CVE-2021-20251 s4:kdc: Check badPwdCount update return > status > >If the account has been locked out in the meantime (indicated by >NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT), we should return the appropriate error >code. > >BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611 > >Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >--- > selftest/knownfail_heimdal_kdc | 4 ---- > source4/kdc/hdb-samba4.c | 9 +++++++-- > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/selftest/knownfail_heimdal_kdc b/selftest/knownfail_heimdal_kdc >index eefa125b70f..4ae27eacb09 100644 >--- a/selftest/knownfail_heimdal_kdc >+++ b/selftest/knownfail_heimdal_kdc >@@ -54,7 +54,3 @@ > ^samba.tests.krb5.protected_users_tests.samba.tests.krb5.protected_users_tests.ProtectedUsersTests.test_proxiable_as_protected.ad_dc > # > ^samba.tests.krb5.protected_users_tests.samba.tests.krb5.protected_users_tests.ProtectedUsersTests.test_samr_change_password_protected.ad_dc >-# >-# Lockout tests >-# >-^samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.samba.tests.krb5.lockout_tests.LockoutTests.test_lockout_race_kdc.ad_dc:local >diff --git a/source4/kdc/hdb-samba4.c b/source4/kdc/hdb-samba4.c >index 22922a23834..3226781cc8d 100644 >--- a/source4/kdc/hdb-samba4.c >+++ b/source4/kdc/hdb-samba4.c >@@ -654,8 +654,13 @@ static krb5_error_code hdb_samba4_audit(krb5_context context, > } else if (hdb_auth_status == KDC_AUTH_EVENT_CLIENT_TIME_SKEW) { > status = NT_STATUS_TIME_DIFFERENCE_AT_DC; > } else if (hdb_auth_status == KDC_AUTH_EVENT_WRONG_LONG_TERM_KEY) { >- authsam_update_bad_pwd_count(kdc_db_ctx->samdb, p->msg, domain_dn); >- status = NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD; >+ status = authsam_update_bad_pwd_count(kdc_db_ctx->samdb, p->msg, domain_dn); >+ if (NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT)) { >+ final_ret = KRB5KDC_ERR_CLIENT_REVOKED; >+ r->error_code = final_ret; >+ } else { >+ status = NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD; >+ } > rwdc_fallback = kdc_db_ctx->rodc; > } else if (hdb_auth_status == KDC_AUTH_EVENT_CLIENT_LOCKED_OUT) { > status = NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT; >-- >2.35.0 > > >From 30d353a9c134d17a9ead59aa17c1ad566b49f03f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2022 15:55:02 +1200 >Subject: [PATCH 21/25] CVE-2021-20251 s4-rpc_server: Check badPwdCount update > return status > >If the account has been locked out in the meantime (indicated by >NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT), we should return the appropriate error >code. > >BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611 > >Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >--- > source4/rpc_server/samr/samr_password.c | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >diff --git a/source4/rpc_server/samr/samr_password.c b/source4/rpc_server/samr/samr_password.c >index 70f969ffdf0..cbf79c8762a 100644 >--- a/source4/rpc_server/samr/samr_password.c >+++ b/source4/rpc_server/samr/samr_password.c >@@ -297,7 +297,11 @@ failed: > > /* Only update the badPwdCount if we found the user */ > if (NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD)) { >- authsam_update_bad_pwd_count(sam_ctx, msg, ldb_get_default_basedn(sam_ctx)); >+ NTSTATUS bad_pwd_status = authsam_update_bad_pwd_count( >+ sam_ctx, msg, ldb_get_default_basedn(sam_ctx)); >+ if (NT_STATUS_EQUAL(bad_pwd_status, NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT)) { >+ status = bad_pwd_status; >+ } > } else if (NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER)) { > /* Don't give the game away: (don't allow anonymous users to prove the existence of usernames) */ > status = NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD; >-- >2.35.0 > > >From f04a8d5e559aff90181c64a70fe23d7f040c36de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 20:18:01 +1200 >Subject: [PATCH 22/25] CVE-2021-20251 s4-rpc_server: Remove transaction logic > from SAMR password change > >samdb_set_password() also starts a transaction, so doing it here is >unecessary and only results in a nested transaction. > >BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611 > >Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >--- > source4/rpc_server/samr/samr_password.c | 24 ------------------------ > 1 file changed, 24 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/source4/rpc_server/samr/samr_password.c b/source4/rpc_server/samr/samr_password.c >index cbf79c8762a..4d4ec23bd0e 100644 >--- a/source4/rpc_server/samr/samr_password.c >+++ b/source4/rpc_server/samr/samr_password.c >@@ -123,7 +123,6 @@ NTSTATUS dcesrv_samr_ChangePasswordUser3(struct dcesrv_call_state *dce_call, > DATA_BLOB new_password; > struct ldb_context *sam_ctx = NULL; > struct ldb_dn *user_dn = NULL; >- int ret; > struct ldb_message *msg = NULL; > struct samr_Password *nt_pwd; > struct samr_DomInfo1 *dominfo = NULL; >@@ -245,12 +244,6 @@ NTSTATUS dcesrv_samr_ChangePasswordUser3(struct dcesrv_call_state *dce_call, > return NT_STATUS_INVALID_SYSTEM_SERVICE; > } > >- ret = ldb_transaction_start(sam_ctx); >- if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { >- DEBUG(1, ("Failed to start transaction: %s\n", ldb_errstring(sam_ctx))); >- return NT_STATUS_TRANSACTION_ABORTED; >- } >- > /* Performs the password modification. We pass the old hashes read out > * from the database since they were already checked against the user- > * provided ones. */ >@@ -262,23 +255,6 @@ NTSTATUS dcesrv_samr_ChangePasswordUser3(struct dcesrv_call_state *dce_call, > &reason, > &dominfo); > >- if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { >- ldb_transaction_cancel(sam_ctx); >- goto failed; >- } >- >- /* And this confirms it in a transaction commit */ >- ret = ldb_transaction_commit(sam_ctx); >- if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { >- DEBUG(1,("Failed to commit transaction to change password on %s: %s\n", >- ldb_dn_get_linearized(user_dn), >- ldb_errstring(sam_ctx))); >- status = NT_STATUS_TRANSACTION_ABORTED; >- goto failed; >- } >- >- status = NT_STATUS_OK; >- > failed: > > log_password_change_event(imsg_ctx, >-- >2.35.0 > > >From 48eb34112e50487c1adafaa4fc490f4a97794698 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 20:51:38 +1200 >Subject: [PATCH 23/25] CVE-2021-20251 s4:auth_winbind: Check return status of > authsam_logon_success_accounting() > >This may return an error if we find the account is locked out. > >BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611 > >Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >--- > source4/auth/ntlm/auth_winbind.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >diff --git a/source4/auth/ntlm/auth_winbind.c b/source4/auth/ntlm/auth_winbind.c >index d7879966603..6381f866667 100644 >--- a/source4/auth/ntlm/auth_winbind.c >+++ b/source4/auth/ntlm/auth_winbind.c >@@ -252,11 +252,14 @@ static void winbind_check_password_done(struct tevent_req *subreq) > status = authsam_search_account(state, ctx->auth_ctx->sam_ctx, > nt4_account, domain_dn, &msg); > if (NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { >- authsam_logon_success_accounting( >+ status = authsam_logon_success_accounting( > ctx->auth_ctx->sam_ctx, msg, > domain_dn, > user_info->flags & USER_INFO_INTERACTIVE_LOGON, > NULL); >+ if (tevent_req_nterror(req, status)) { >+ return; >+ } > } > } > >-- >2.35.0 > > >From 27c8ed1a12c6628c248e56ce53cc07e094d566f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org> >Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 12:11:35 -0800 >Subject: [PATCH 24/25] CVE-2021-20251 s3: ensure bad password count atomic > updates > >The bad password count is supposed to limit the number of failed login >attempt a user can make before being temporarily locked out, but race >conditions between processes have allowed determined attackers to make >many more than the specified number of attempts. This is especially >bad on constrained or overcommitted hardware. > >To fix this, once a bad password is detected, we reload the sam account >information under a user-specific mutex, ensuring we have an up to >date bad password count. > >Discovered by Nathaniel W. Turner. > >BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611 > >Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org> >--- > source3/auth/check_samsec.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+) > >diff --git a/source3/auth/check_samsec.c b/source3/auth/check_samsec.c >index b9563c958a9..bd8ca8de2f0 100644 >--- a/source3/auth/check_samsec.c >+++ b/source3/auth/check_samsec.c >@@ -379,6 +379,8 @@ NTSTATUS check_sam_security(const DATA_BLOB *challenge, > const uint8_t *nt_pw; > const uint8_t *lm_pw; > uint32_t acct_ctrl; >+ char *mutex_name_by_user = NULL; >+ struct named_mutex *mtx = NULL; > > /* the returned struct gets kept on the server_info, by means > of a steal further down */ >@@ -418,6 +420,79 @@ NTSTATUS check_sam_security(const DATA_BLOB *challenge, > challenge, lm_pw, nt_pw, > user_info, &user_sess_key, &lm_sess_key); > >+ /* >+ * We must re-load the sam acount information under a mutex >+ * lock to ensure we don't miss any concurrent account lockout >+ * changes. >+ */ >+ >+ /* Clear out old sampass info. */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(sampass); >+ acct_ctrl = 0; >+ username = NULL; >+ nt_pw = NULL; >+ lm_pw = NULL; >+ >+ sampass = samu_new(mem_ctx); >+ if (sampass == NULL) { >+ return NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY; >+ } >+ >+ mutex_name_by_user = talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, >+ "check_sam_security_mutex_%s", >+ user_info->mapped.account_name); >+ if (mutex_name_by_user == NULL) { >+ nt_status = NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY; >+ goto done; >+ } >+ >+ /* Grab the named mutex under root with 30 second timeout. */ >+ become_root(); >+ mtx = grab_named_mutex(mem_ctx, mutex_name_by_user, 30); >+ if (mtx != NULL) { >+ /* Re-load the account information if we got the mutex. */ >+ ret = pdb_getsampwnam(sampass, user_info->mapped.account_name); >+ } >+ unbecome_root(); >+ >+ /* Everything from here on until mtx is freed is done under the mutex.*/ >+ >+ if (mtx == NULL) { >+ DBG_ERR("Acquisition of mutex %s failed " >+ "for user %s\n", >+ mutex_name_by_user, >+ user_info->mapped.account_name); >+ nt_status = NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR; >+ goto done; >+ } >+ >+ if (!ret) { >+ /* >+ * Re-load of account failed. This could only happen if the >+ * user was deleted in the meantime. >+ */ >+ DBG_NOTICE("reload of user '%s' in passdb failed.\n", >+ user_info->mapped.account_name); >+ nt_status = NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER; >+ goto done; >+ } >+ >+ /* Re-load the account control info. */ >+ acct_ctrl = pdb_get_acct_ctrl(sampass); >+ username = pdb_get_username(sampass); >+ >+ /* >+ * Check if the account is now locked out - now under the mutex. >+ * This can happen if the server is under >+ * a password guess attack and the ACB_AUTOLOCK is set by >+ * another process. >+ */ >+ if (acct_ctrl & ACB_AUTOLOCK) { >+ DBG_NOTICE("Account for user %s was locked out.\n", username); >+ nt_status = NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT; >+ goto done; >+ } >+ > /* Notify passdb backend of login success/failure. If not > NT_STATUS_OK the backend doesn't like the login */ > >@@ -510,6 +585,8 @@ done: > TALLOC_FREE(sampass); > data_blob_free(&user_sess_key); > data_blob_free(&lm_sess_key); >+ TALLOC_FREE(mutex_name_by_user); >+ TALLOC_FREE(mtx); > return nt_status; > } > >-- >2.35.0 > > >From 6e4063dba1da69698e14fb82fef13360d09b55eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 20:17:33 +1200 >Subject: [PATCH 25/25] CVE-2021-20251 s3: Ensure bad password count atomic > updates for SAMR password change > >The bad password count is supposed to limit the number of failed login >attempt a user can make before being temporarily locked out, but race >conditions between processes have allowed determined attackers to make >many more than the specified number of attempts. This is especially >bad on constrained or overcommitted hardware. > >To fix this, once a bad password is detected, we reload the sam account >information under a user-specific mutex, ensuring we have an up to >date bad password count. > >Derived from a similar patch to source3/auth/check_samsec.c by >Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org> > >BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611 > >Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> >--- > source3/rpc_server/samr/srv_samr_chgpasswd.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/source3/rpc_server/samr/srv_samr_chgpasswd.c b/source3/rpc_server/samr/srv_samr_chgpasswd.c >index b5cd308a119..6e99c0f0a9c 100644 >--- a/source3/rpc_server/samr/srv_samr_chgpasswd.c >+++ b/source3/rpc_server/samr/srv_samr_chgpasswd.c >@@ -1201,6 +1201,8 @@ NTSTATUS pass_oem_change(char *user, const char *rhost, > bool ret = false; > bool updated_badpw = false; > NTSTATUS update_login_attempts_status; >+ char *mutex_name_by_user = NULL; >+ struct named_mutex *mtx = NULL; > > if (!(sampass = samu_new(NULL))) { > return NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY; >@@ -1212,15 +1214,15 @@ NTSTATUS pass_oem_change(char *user, const char *rhost, > > if (ret == false) { > DEBUG(0,("pass_oem_change: getsmbpwnam returned NULL\n")); >- TALLOC_FREE(sampass); >- return NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER; >+ nt_status = NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER; >+ goto done; > } > > /* Quit if the account was locked out. */ > if (pdb_get_acct_ctrl(sampass) & ACB_AUTOLOCK) { > DEBUG(3,("check_sam_security: Account for user %s was locked out.\n", user)); >- TALLOC_FREE(sampass); >- return NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT; >+ nt_status = NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT; >+ goto done; > } > > nt_status = check_oem_password(user, >@@ -1231,6 +1233,71 @@ NTSTATUS pass_oem_change(char *user, const char *rhost, > sampass, > &new_passwd); > >+ /* >+ * We must re-load the sam acount information under a mutex >+ * lock to ensure we don't miss any concurrent account lockout >+ * changes. >+ */ >+ >+ /* Clear out old sampass info. */ >+ TALLOC_FREE(sampass); >+ >+ sampass = samu_new(NULL); >+ if (sampass == NULL) { >+ return NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY; >+ } >+ >+ mutex_name_by_user = talloc_asprintf(NULL, >+ "check_sam_security_mutex_%s", >+ user); >+ if (mutex_name_by_user == NULL) { >+ nt_status = NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY; >+ goto done; >+ } >+ >+ /* Grab the named mutex under root with 30 second timeout. */ >+ become_root(); >+ mtx = grab_named_mutex(NULL, mutex_name_by_user, 30); >+ if (mtx != NULL) { >+ /* Re-load the account information if we got the mutex. */ >+ ret = pdb_getsampwnam(sampass, user); >+ } >+ unbecome_root(); >+ >+ /* Everything from here on until mtx is freed is done under the mutex.*/ >+ >+ if (mtx == NULL) { >+ DBG_ERR("Acquisition of mutex %s failed " >+ "for user %s\n", >+ mutex_name_by_user, >+ user); >+ nt_status = NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR; >+ goto done; >+ } >+ >+ if (!ret) { >+ /* >+ * Re-load of account failed. This could only happen if the >+ * user was deleted in the meantime. >+ */ >+ DBG_NOTICE("reload of user '%s' in passdb failed.\n", >+ user); >+ nt_status = NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER; >+ goto done; >+ } >+ >+ /* >+ * Check if the account is now locked out - now under the mutex. >+ * This can happen if the server is under >+ * a password guess attack and the ACB_AUTOLOCK is set by >+ * another process. >+ */ >+ if (pdb_get_acct_ctrl(sampass) & ACB_AUTOLOCK) { >+ DBG_NOTICE("Account for user %s was locked out.\n", user); >+ nt_status = NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT; >+ goto done; >+ } >+ > /* > * Notify passdb backend of login success/failure. If not > * NT_STATUS_OK the backend doesn't like the login >@@ -1278,8 +1345,7 @@ NTSTATUS pass_oem_change(char *user, const char *rhost, > } > > if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(nt_status)) { >- TALLOC_FREE(sampass); >- return nt_status; >+ goto done; > } > > /* We've already checked the old password here.... */ >@@ -1290,7 +1356,10 @@ NTSTATUS pass_oem_change(char *user, const char *rhost, > > memset(new_passwd, 0, strlen(new_passwd)); > >+done: > TALLOC_FREE(sampass); >+ TALLOC_FREE(mutex_name_by_user); >+ TALLOC_FREE(mtx); > > return nt_status; > } >-- >2.35.0 >
You cannot view the attachment while viewing its details because your browser does not support IFRAMEs.
View the attachment on a separate page
.
View Attachment As Raw
Flags:
jsutton
:
ci-passed-
Actions:
View
Attachments on
bug 14611
:
16386
|
16390
|
16391
|
16392
|
16393
|
16411
|
16474
|
16483
|
16484
|
16485
|
16486
|
16487
|
16573
|
17410
|
17411
|
17413
|
17436
|
17452
|
17453
|
17456
|
17513
|
17521
|
17733
|
17734