The Samba-Bugzilla – Attachment 15616 Details for
Bug 14182
vfs_glusterfs does not deal with msdfs links correctly
Home
|
New
|
Browse
|
Search
|
[?]
|
Reports
|
Requests
|
Help
|
New Account
|
Log In
[x]
|
Forgot Password
Login:
[x]
[patch]
patch
0001-s3-VFS-glusterfs-Reset-nlinks-for-symlink-entries-du.patch (text/plain), 1.41 KB, created by
Anoop C S
on 2019-11-13 09:53:25 UTC
(
hide
)
Description:
patch
Filename:
MIME Type:
Creator:
Anoop C S
Created:
2019-11-13 09:53:25 UTC
Size:
1.41 KB
patch
obsolete
>From 17995af6b82d27f22f444cdff9b4399fdd4c869c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: Anoop C S <anoopcs@redhat.com> >Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 19:58:43 +0530 >Subject: [PATCH] s3: VFS: glusterfs: Reset nlinks for symlink entries during > readdir > >On receiving an already initialized stat_ex buffer for readdir() call we >invoke readdirplus() GlusterFS API, an optimized variant of readdir(), >which then returns stat information along with dir entry result. But for >symlink entries we don't know if link or target info is needed. In that >case it is better to leave this decision back to caller by resetting >nlinks value inside stat information to make it invalid. > >This was also preventing us from displaying msdfs link as directories >inside the share. > >BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14182 > >Signed-off-by: Anoop C S <anoopcs@redhat.com> >--- > source3/modules/vfs_glusterfs.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >diff --git a/source3/modules/vfs_glusterfs.c b/source3/modules/vfs_glusterfs.c >index 6d087c0b4d4..b1b73617edc 100644 >--- a/source3/modules/vfs_glusterfs.c >+++ b/source3/modules/vfs_glusterfs.c >@@ -564,7 +564,10 @@ static struct dirent *vfs_gluster_readdir(struct vfs_handle_struct *handle, > } > > if (sbuf != NULL) { >- smb_stat_ex_from_stat(sbuf, &stat); >+ SET_STAT_INVALID(*sbuf); >+ if (!S_ISLNK(stat.st_mode)) { >+ smb_stat_ex_from_stat(sbuf, &stat); >+ } > } > > END_PROFILE(syscall_readdir); >-- >2.23.0 >
You cannot view the attachment while viewing its details because your browser does not support IFRAMEs.
View the attachment on a separate page
.
View Attachment As Raw
Flags:
gd
:
review+
gd
:
review?
(
obnox
)
gd
:
review+
gd
:
ci-passed+
Actions:
View
Attachments on
bug 14182
: 15616 |
15695